2018 pre-season testing thread

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
Locked
User avatar
Xero
32
Joined: 28 Jan 2014, 15:11
Location: Moray, Scotland

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Mansell89 wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:27
Can someone try and context Alonso final quick lap for me?

Guessing it was likely to be a low fuel run in comparison to the other McLaren times this week, so do we think we can compare it like for like with Ferrari’s speed or is it likely Ferrari may have had extra fuel or holding back?

I’d be happy if it’s like for like as I was expecting McLaren to be over a second behind the front runners the way things were unfolding
It's impossible to tell. Just listened to Alonso's pre-testing twitter message to the fans, suggesting they simply turned the PU up a bit. Will have to wait until Melbourne for a definitive answer.

User avatar
Dixo
1
Joined: 01 Mar 2014, 20:49
Location: Czech Republic

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Poor Kimi! I don't remember when he did more laps than his team mate during the winter tests... #-o
Moreover, they have a biggest lap difference between each other comparing to other team mates.

User avatar
Zynerji
110
Joined: 27 Jan 2016, 16:14

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Dixo wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:39
Poor Kimi! I don't remember when he did more laps than his team mate during the winter tests... #-o
Moreover, they have a biggest lap difference between each other comparing to other team mates.
Kimi was sick...

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Mansell89 wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:27
Can someone try and context Alonso final quick lap for me?

Guessing it was likely to be a low fuel run in comparison to the other McLaren times this week, so do we think we can compare it like for like with Ferrari’s speed or is it likely Ferrari may have had extra fuel or holding back?

I’d be happy if it’s like for like as I was expecting McLaren to be over a second behind the front runners the way things were unfolding
Mclaren keeps proclaiming they have a quick car; maybe they actually do?
Honda!

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Fer.Fan wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 19:58
godlameroso wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 16:53
Phil wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 16:44


I'll just add something, that you missed:

Vettel did a stint of
SS - 13 laps
M - 27 laps
M - 25 laps

Bottad and Hamilton did a stint of
M - 29 laps
M - 17 laps
M - 19 laps

So yes, you are right, the first stint on a much quicker but less durable tire did compromise his 2nd and 3rd stint relative to the Mercedes, but you can still compare Bottas and Hamilton's lap from lap 14 to 29 - then you can compare the Mercedes on (at that point) 13 laps old tires vs Vettel on new & fresh M tires on the same fuel load. That should be comparable, as Bottas and Hamiltons first stint was aiming to do 29 laps on a much heavier car than Vettel on his 2nd stint but comparable laps. So in theory, Vettels stint and times should compare favorably assuming a similar fast car.

Yet comparing these laps, Vettel is at best equal or slower (especially than Hamilton who dips into high 21 times).

I believe dans already did that in his post.
I'm not sure the fuel load is the same, remember last year Mercedes needed less fuel to do a race distance than everyone else. Secondly, one does not need the full 105kg to do the race distance, so it's very possible that fuel levels could be obfuscating true pace. A 30kg difference in fuel is worth ~1 second of lap time. Vettel mentioned he had plenty of fuel left over after his race sim, which could easily explain the lack of pace relative to Mercedes if they only added enough to do the race sim.
"Vettel mentioned he had plenty of fuel left over after his race sim, which could easily explain the lack of pace relative to Mercedes if they only added enough to do the race sim."

Source please on Vettels comment?

I Agree, this can easily explain the lack of pace for Ferrari.
I caught it in an interview on one of the Ted notebooks.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
LeClerc
0
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 12:58

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

dren wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:57
Mansell89 wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:27
Can someone try and context Alonso final quick lap for me?

Guessing it was likely to be a low fuel run in comparison to the other McLaren times this week, so do we think we can compare it like for like with Ferrari’s speed or is it likely Ferrari may have had extra fuel or holding back?

I’d be happy if it’s like for like as I was expecting McLaren to be over a second behind the front runners the way things were unfolding
Mclaren keeps proclaiming they have a quick car; maybe they actually do?
15 more days, and we will know.

They certainly looked like they were improving at the last part of last season. This years car should at least be at that level.

Whether they can turn that into results is another story. It seems there is reason to question the reliability of the Renault PU, and operationally the team is obviously not as sharp as they once were.
It is I, LeClerc!

User avatar
TAG
20
Joined: 09 Dec 2014, 16:18
Location: in a good place

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Zynerji wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:55
Dixo wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:39
Poor Kimi! I don't remember when he did more laps than his team mate during the winter tests... #-o
Moreover, they have a biggest lap difference between each other comparing to other team mates.
Kimi was sick...
It was in Vettel's contract for Kimi to be sick. :evil:
माकडाच्या हाती कोलीत

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

LeClerc wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 21:12
dren wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:57
Mansell89 wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:27
Can someone try and context Alonso final quick lap for me?

Guessing it was likely to be a low fuel run in comparison to the other McLaren times this week, so do we think we can compare it like for like with Ferrari’s speed or is it likely Ferrari may have had extra fuel or holding back?

I’d be happy if it’s like for like as I was expecting McLaren to be over a second behind the front runners the way things were unfolding
Mclaren keeps proclaiming they have a quick car; maybe they actually do?
15 more days, and we will know.

They certainly looked like they were improving at the last part of last season. This years car should at least be at that level.

Whether they can turn that into results is another story. It seems there is reason to question the reliability of the Renault PU, and operationally the team is obviously not as sharp as they once were.
The racing team seems to be quite the joke, but the car itself looks quick. They think they're there with or better than Renault. We'll see how it pans out like you said!
Honda!

Atticus
2
Joined: 08 May 2015, 22:48
Contact:

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

Jambier wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 20:32
According Pirelli:

Medium
Soft -0.8s
SuperSoft -0.4s
UltraSoft -0.6s
HyperSoft -0.7s

But keep in mind that in general, it does not sum up.
And some cars prefers some tyres, I assume that Mercedes will often race on an harder compound than Ferrari.
Ah, just what I needed.

Let the number crunching begin. 8)
The F1 Formbook - https://thef1formbook.wordpress.com/
Performance analysis of F1 race weekends based on raw official data

User avatar
iotar__
7
Joined: 28 Sep 2012, 12:31

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

I love the fact that after all the internet's variables, times don't mean anything, tyres, fuel, engines etc. McLaren's team boss is putting his team next to Haas and Renault based on:

- ONE DAMN LAP at the very end of final day of tests. No wait, even better: based on how this one lap could have been quicker #-o . Take that, times in testing don't mean anything crowd :D .

DFX
DFX
8
Joined: 27 May 2016, 19:56

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

iotar__ wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 22:13
I love the fact that after all the internet's variables, times don't mean anything, tyres, fuel, engines etc. McLaren's team boss is putting his team next to Haas and Renault based on:

- ONE DAMN LAP at the very end of final day of tests. No wait, even better: based on how this one lap could have been quicker #-o . Take that, times in testing don't mean anything crowd :D .
Maybe, just maybe, they have more data to make this assessment than us. :)

User avatar
LeClerc
0
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 12:58

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

DFX wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 22:30
iotar__ wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 22:13
I love the fact that after all the internet's variables, times don't mean anything, tyres, fuel, engines etc. McLaren's team boss is putting his team next to Haas and Renault based on:

- ONE DAMN LAP at the very end of final day of tests. No wait, even better: based on how this one lap could have been quicker #-o . Take that, times in testing don't mean anything crowd :D .
Maybe, just maybe, they have more data to make this assessment than us. :)
That is not a maybe. Of course they do.

OTOH, this is the same man who kept telling us the check was in the post.....
It is I, LeClerc!

User avatar
DiogoBrand
73
Joined: 14 May 2015, 19:02
Location: Brazil

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

DFX wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 22:30
iotar__ wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 22:13
I love the fact that after all the internet's variables, times don't mean anything, tyres, fuel, engines etc. McLaren's team boss is putting his team next to Haas and Renault based on:

- ONE DAMN LAP at the very end of final day of tests. No wait, even better: based on how this one lap could have been quicker #-o . Take that, times in testing don't mean anything crowd :D .
Maybe, just maybe, they have more data to make this assessment than us. :)
And also, judging by the time they achieved, putting themselves next to Renault and Haas isn't that bold a statement. At least it's not like in the Honda era: "We completed one lap without the PU blowing up, that means that by the end of the year Honda will have the best PU in the grid and we will be champions!"

GoranF1
155
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia
Contact:

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

iotar__ wrote:
09 Mar 2018, 22:13
I love the fact that after all the internet's variables, times don't mean anything, tyres, fuel, engines etc. McLaren's team boss is putting his team next to Haas and Renault based on:

- ONE DAMN LAP at the very end of final day of tests. No wait, even better: based on how this one lap could have been quicker #-o . Take that, times in testing don't mean anything crowd :D .
I already have a few warnings but are you really dumb or are you just playing dumb?
"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."

LM10
120
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: 2018 pre-season testing thread

Post

I just can't (or let's say, don't want to) believe that Ferrari is so much behind Mercedes and even RBR. Can't wait for Melbourne to start so that all the speculations end and we finally see the reality.

Even IF it turns out they actually are quite behind, I think it would be because they don't understand their car fully yet and we can expect more improvement than from the opponent.

Or.. they actually messed it up which I really don't hope. I hate speculations.. :lol:
Last edited by LM10 on 09 Mar 2018, 22:46, edited 1 time in total.

Locked