BMW & Williams under investigation!

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Post

checkered wrote:I did some further

digging about how fuel is handled etc. and interesting details emerged. Small deviations from acceptable figures aren't that uncommon (especially in highly variable conditions) and it is highly likely that such events have been registered at many races during the season, but no action has been taken thus far. Is the FIA to open an investigation to all the races of 2007 while they're at it? That would certainly yield surprising results.

Fuel is handled by the teams in containers that hold 100 kilograms each; such an amount takes a certain amount of time to cool/warm up and we're dealing with a flammable substance prone to evaporation, too. There is a lag when changing the temperature throughout the mass and sometimes there's not enough time to get the figures exactly right. The containers are cooled down to a specific temperature in the morning of the day of intended usage, but I didn't quite get how that figure is determined. With a weather forecast?

Weren't there people here who work/have worked for F1 fuel suppliers? I think so. Hopefully they can corroborate or discredit what I've found and elaborate on what is being discussed here. It'd be a great help, to get to the bottom of this. Everything I've read thus far suggests (well, to me at least), that McLaren's inquiry will get nowhere as far as the results from Brazil are concerned.
Hi! I'm a physicochemist and such processes aren't uncommon for me. That's why I was very surprised with hearing that story. The 10 degree difference rule seems awkward to me. There are plenty of reasons why - innaccuracy of ambient temperature detection, probability of rapid changes in ambient conditions that may cause deviation from the limits. Also, to punish the team it should be proved that they deliberately broken the rule, so it should be proven that they intentionally cooled fuel to illegal temperature before the race. As I said before in my mind there should be proposed absolute temperature limit for the fuel temperature.

User avatar
checkered
0
Joined: 02 Mar 2007, 14:32

Post

timbo wrote:Hi! I'm a physicochemist and such processes aren't uncommon for me. That's why I was very surprised with hearing that story. The 10 degree difference rule seems awkward to me. There are plenty of reasons why - innaccuracy of ambient temperature detection, probability of rapid changes in ambient conditions that may cause deviation from the limits. Also, to punish the team it should be proved that they deliberately broken the rule, so it should be proven that they intentionally cooled fuel to illegal temperature before the race. As I said before in my mind there should be proposed absolute temperature limit for the fuel temperature.
Thank you for

the insight. I was thinking (roughly) along the same lines. Well, now the issue is going to go into the appeals court and it's in their discretion to do pretty much anything. Hopefully it will also result in a clarification of the fuel temperature rules in general.

User avatar
Ray
2
Joined: 22 Nov 2006, 06:33
Location: Atlanta

Post

http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=41175

What a lame witch hunt. I said it before, and I'll say it again. Had Super Aguri or Spyker been found having cold fuel, McLaren wouldn't care. Their main and only goal is to have the two teams DQ'd and Lewis crowned champ. If they say otherwise, they are blatantly lying, and I have no respect for them.

It held no advantage whatsoever for the fuel to be 2-4 degrees cooler than it should be. Lewis wasn't going to catch them anyway. It's a witch hunt. Kimi beat him fair and square and McLaren are trying to salvage something, anything, from a disastrous season. Losers.

kimi
kimi
0
Joined: 06 Jul 2007, 19:19
Location: india

Post

well many still believe that its fair in mclaren's point of view to win the title in court as they lost the constructor's title in court.but its not right.

mclaren had 218 points(adding alonso n lewis's total points)
now subtracting 15 points(hungary penalty) means mclaren have 203 points with ferrari having 204 points.

so mclaren again lost it on track,not in court.

now coming to the topic if the FIA can anyhow prove that the teams broke any rules and it is justified then the only penalty i can imagine is constructor points being stripped off.but driver's should not be penalised for this issue.

hope i am right.. :D

User avatar
Rob W
0
Joined: 18 Aug 2006, 03:28

Post

I know what McLaren are up to... If they succeed and Lewis is confirmed as WDC they will run with the numbers 1 & 2 next year.

As it stands however, and because they got zero points in the constructor's championship, in 2008 they will run with numbers 23 and 24 which I very much doubt they will like.

They'll have to widen their nose-cone to fit a two digit number on it for the first time in decades. :lol:

Rob W

eenter
eenter
0
Joined: 10 Oct 2007, 11:11

Post

Rob W wrote:As it stands however, and because they got zero points in the constructor's championship, in 2008 they will run with numbers 23 and 24 which I very much doubt they will like.
Wrong.

dumrick
dumrick
0
Joined: 19 Jan 2004, 13:36
Location: Portugal

Post

Wrong? Why?

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Post

eenter wrote: Wrong.
I assume you've assumed that Prodrive won't make an appearance?

In which case you're a little premature.
- Axle

User avatar
astsmtl
0
Joined: 20 Jan 2007, 13:56

Post

dumrick wrote:Wrong? Why?
I think because numbers are assigned in respect to WDC positions.
  • 1. Raikkonen
    2. Massa (because of Raikkonen)
    3. Hamilton
    4. Alonso
    5. Heidfeld
    6. Kubica
    ...
P.S. Alonso's number 4 - assuming he stays in McLaren.

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Post

astsmtl wrote:
dumrick wrote:Wrong? Why?
I think because numbers are assigned in respect to WDC positions.
  • 1. Raikkonen
    2. Massa (because of Raikkonen)
    3. Hamilton
    4. Alonso
    5. Heidfeld
    6. Kubica
    ...
I thought only the actual WDC over-rode the WCC order?? As the cars are always numbered in pairs...

I'm sure someone will post the right page in the FIA rule book soon.

But if it's WCC positions with the exception of the WDC then would McLaren still be 21/22 because Prodrive would be new...and therefor given the last numbers?
- Axle

antrock
antrock
2
Joined: 20 Jun 2007, 17:14

Post

numbers are assigned in respect of the teams WCC position the previous year except that the WDC and his team get number 1 & 2.

Kimi 1
Massa 2
Nick 3
Kubica 4
...

Hamilton 21

User avatar
johny
0
Joined: 07 Apr 2005, 09:06
Location: Spain

Post

mclaren is the 11th team, and don't forget that no one has nº 13

dumrick
dumrick
0
Joined: 19 Jan 2004, 13:36
Location: Portugal

Post

Exactly. That gives Macca numbers 22 & 23 next year, right? Prodrive, if they race, would have 24 & 25.

modbaraban
modbaraban
0
Joined: 05 Apr 2007, 17:44
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Post

disregard

User avatar
Tom
0
Joined: 13 Jan 2006, 00:24
Location: Bicester

Post

Numbers are assigned by WDC points, as stated above the Ferrari's would be 1-2 with Kimi leading, Mclaren 3-4 and BMW 5-6...

and eenter, welcome to the forum and everything but please don't just post 'Wrong!' with no explanation as to what is right or you just look like an arrogant fool, which I'm sure you're not.
Murphy's 9th Law of Technology:
Tell a man there are 300 million stars in the universe and he'll believe you. Tell him a bench has wet paint on it and he'll have to touch to be sure.