I think its clear that other dimensions have also changed hence the need to revise the pylonsgilgen wrote:This is only a cosmetic change. The bulkhead remains at its low height as heretofore, and only the tip of the nosecone has been raised slightly, if at all. It could well be that the only difference is a slightly concave top.
I think that might be it though. Looks to me they have scraped off some carbon on tóp of the nose cone then just raised the front of it.Coefficient wrote:I think its clear that other dimensions have also changed hence the need to revise the pylonsgilgen wrote:This is only a cosmetic change. The bulkhead remains at its low height as heretofore, and only the tip of the nosecone has been raised slightly, if at all. It could well be that the only difference is a slightly concave top.
The old nose was pointing down to the floor and would have generated downforce at the tip. The air then gets used over the top of the car.gilgen wrote:This is only a cosmetic change. The bulkhead remains at its low height as heretofore, and only the tip of the nosecone has been raised slightly, if at all. It could well be that the only difference is a slightly concave top.
I don't see what you are talking about.brucci2000 wrote:[img]http://img1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/McL ... 80.jpg[img]
Does anyone else see a second layer below the main plane on the outer section of the wing? Is this real, optical illusion or test gubbins? Was it always there?
Yup! You can even see the shadow.bhallg2k wrote:It appears to be the tea tray.
Thanks for clearing that up - just one of those strange alignments in a picture. The complex surfaces of the cars can lead to all sorts of illusions on 2D photos - especially when they paint most of it in chrome!gilgen wrote:Yup! You can even see the shadow.bhallg2k wrote:It appears to be the tea tray.