I think teams would love such an "aero-neutral" exhaust configuration these days.
(They blew the rear wing with ease.)
It's easy to rush to judgment* when one sees Car A turning out quicker lap times than Car B as if the exhaust layout is the major factor for the differences in performance, but it just doesn't work that way. I've seen quotes from the teams that indicate about 25% of the benefits of pre-2012 EBDs can be recovered under the 2012 regulations. If we take the 2011 British Grand Prix as a very, very,
very rough estimate, we can see that the 0.5 sec advantage enjoyed by Red Bull over Ferrari in qualifying was reduced to 0.1 sec when off-throttle exhaust was temporarily banned. That implies a rough value of 0.4 sec of which 0.1 sec can be recovered. Even by F1 standards, that's not a whole lot.
You also can't really look at other teams' solutions and expect to see a carbon-copy implemented elsewhere. In the case of McLaren's exhaust, it's unlikely Ferrari will adopt that solution for the very simple reason that Ferrari's engine has very different cooling requirements than the Mercedes. At the same time, however, that doesn't mean the two teams aren't pursuing the same exhaust philosophy. They just look different.
* I should know. No one, and I mean
no one, rushes to judgment faster.