Caterham couldn't get it to work either.raymondu999 wrote:I don't get it either tbh. I mean they made a massive tunnel in the V2 tunnel which they tested on Friday - and Caterham seems to still have it.
To my memory, Gascoyne is one of the better "copycat" tech directors out there, but not exactly creative in his own way - but what is it that he's doing with the tunnel that arguably the best aero mind in the business cannot do?
Well Red Bull raced it even though they couldn't get it to work. Just means it was better than their alternative configuration of the day, not that it was perfect.raymondu999 wrote:I thought they raced it?
He's still a full time employee, and no intentions to leaveshelly wrote:Is prodromou still working for rbr or is he in gardening leave already?
I meant Caterhammyurr wrote:Well Red Bull raced it even though they couldn't get it to work. Just means it was better than their alternative configuration of the day, not that it was perfect.raymondu999 wrote:I thought they raced it?
Nah.raymondu999 wrote:I thought they raced it?
@crucial: this should be lotus e20. Notice that rad position and the different crash pods. lotus' pods are filled in white (rohacell?) whereas rbr's pods are hollowCrucial_Xtreme wrote:Side pod detail
Yes. Look at the blurred shirt in the back. I can make out the logos of Total and TW Steel, i.e. It's Lotus.shelly wrote:@crucial: this should be lotus e20. Notice that rad position and the different crash pods. lotus' pods are filled in white (rohacell?) whereas rbr's pods are hollow
Crucial, please move this to the Force India's thread, because it is VJM05... Look at that Mercedes engineCrucial_Xtreme wrote:Side pod detail
What's that jig on the back of the car, suspension jig maybe? Havn't seen anything like that before. I'm pretty confident its not part of the rear crash structure and beam wing.Crucial_Xtreme wrote:Side pod detail
Suspension detail
http://www.formula1.com/wi/sutton/2012/d12esp291.jpg
http://www.formula1.com/wi/sutton/2012/d12esp292.jpg
@shelly damn photographers and their "descriptions" My apologies