Marussia MR02 Cosworth

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Post Reply
LotusF1
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2009, 10:08

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

marussia ahead of caterham by quite a margin...and this time they wont need luck to beat them :D

CottrellGP
4
Joined: 02 Sep 2011, 01:48

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

Im glad Marussia beat Caterham, there car is simple with a lot of room for development! :D
Dan Cottrell

Master Of Innovation!

User avatar
Forza
238
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 20:55

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

F1 Malaysian GP - Thursday - 21/3/2013

Image
ImageImageImageImage
Image

Polarbear
0
Joined: 05 Jul 2011, 10:51

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

The pictures which have the two wings one on top of the other - the FWEP detail is different in the two wings.

One has a 90 degree angle in the top corner, the other appears to have had the corner chopped off.

Thoughts?

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

Polarbear wrote:The pictures which have the two wings one on top of the other - the FWEP detail is different in the two wings.

One has a 90 degree angle in the top corner, the other appears to have had the corner chopped off.

Thoughts?
They are actually 2 completely different wings. Look at the vertical strakes, the flaps and the curves in the main planes at the endplates.

Looking back at previous pictures they also tried out both of them in Melbourne. Judging from the "picture time" each wing got, I dare say they ran the top one there. It generally looks much more developed and seems to manage the airflow better.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
Forza
238
Joined: 08 Sep 2010, 20:55

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

F1 Malaysian GP - Friday FP - 22/3/2013
Image

CottrellGP
4
Joined: 02 Sep 2011, 01:48

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

Forza wrote:F1 Malaysian GP - Friday FP - 22/3/2013
http://img1.auto-motor-und-sport.de/Max ... 671374.jpg
Is that the launch spec airbox/cooling vent? or is it new?
Dan Cottrell

Master Of Innovation!

User avatar
Cuky
65
Joined: 07 Dec 2011, 19:41
Location: Rab, Croatia

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

yep, that is launch one. One used in Melbourne is shorter and because of that has large white fin to comply with rules

Huntresa
54
Joined: 03 Dec 2011, 11:33

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

Not far behind bottas, this is looking good

miguelalvesreis
16
Joined: 12 May 2012, 13:38

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

Huntresa wrote:Not far behind bottas, this is looking good
Not to Bottas!!

LotusF1
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2009, 10:08

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

the marussia has more downforce than the caterham. now who were the geniuses that called this car simple/elementary? :D

Coefficient
20
Joined: 11 Mar 2011, 23:29
Location: North West - UK
Contact:

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

To be fair, Caterham have only spent about a fiver remodelling last years car for this year because they have long stated that they are throwing everything at the 2014 car. John Iley (ex Mclaren head of Aero) is currently beavering away at Leafield on the design of next years car so I fully expect Caterham to trounce Marussia next year.
"I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it".

beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

LotusF1 wrote:the marussia has more downforce than the caterham. now who were the geniuses that called this car simple/elementary? :D
It is simple. Just people still don't understand that complex does not mean good.

Coefficient
20
Joined: 11 Mar 2011, 23:29
Location: North West - UK
Contact:

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

beelsebob wrote:
LotusF1 wrote:the marussia has more downforce than the caterham. now who were the geniuses that called this car simple/elementary? :D
It is simple. Just people still don't understand that complex does not mean good.
Lots of aero detail can me 2 things.

1. The basic concept is flawed or sub-optimal so lots of appendages are required to re-condition the flow.

2. The car's flow characteristics are very well understood, it's working well and gains can be found by augmenting the flow with detail changes. (Red Bull)
"I started out with nothing and I've still got most of it".

CottrellGP
4
Joined: 02 Sep 2011, 01:48

Re: Marussia MR02 Cosworth

Post

Coefficient wrote:
beelsebob wrote:
LotusF1 wrote:the marussia has more downforce than the caterham. now who were the geniuses that called this car simple/elementary? :D
It is simple. Just people still don't understand that complex does not mean good.
Lots of aero detail can me 2 things.

1. The basic concept is flawed or sub-optimal so lots of appendages are required to re-condition the flow.

2. The car's flow characteristics are very well understood, it's working well and gains can be found by augmenting the flow with detail changes. (Red Bull)
Perfect example!
Dan Cottrell

Master Of Innovation!

Post Reply