Alpine A521

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Further discussion about steering systems in general can happen here:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=29824

User avatar
Redragon
19
Joined: 24 May 2011, 12:23

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Marko compleinning about Alpine flexible rear wing. The irony of Redbull not happy with the flexibility of others. Thought they never had problems with it as they were the masters on the area. I guess Alpine and Alfa are now the top dogs on designing flexible wings

User avatar
Nano4k
5
Joined: 12 Feb 2019, 14:23

Re: Alpine A521

Post


User avatar
diffuser
207
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Why is that a rear wing Bend and not the rear suspension squat?

Owen.C93
171
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Alpine A521

Post

diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 03:42
Why is that a rear wing Bend and not the rear suspension squat?
Because the wing and camera are fixed relative to each other via the body?
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
diffuser
207
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Owen.C93 wrote:
19 May 2021, 07:17
diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 03:42
Why is that a rear wing Bend and not the rear suspension squat?
Because the wing and camera are fixed relative to each other via the body?
The camera is in that black horizontal tube about 4"(10 CMs) near the roll hoop. The rake fulcrum is the front wheels. The rear wing squat will travel much more the camera. Even so, the rear wing drop would still be apparent if they both dropped together.

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Alpine A521

Post

diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 03:42
Why is that a rear wing Bend and not the rear suspension squat?
The grid lines are "fixed" to the camera. The camera and fin are both fixed to the car. Notice that the tip of the fin doesn't move vertically relative to the grid lines. Thus the only thing moving is the wing relative to the camera. This takes out the effect of the suspension squat and just shows the motion of the wing relative to the camera.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

User avatar
diffuser
207
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
19 May 2021, 09:51
diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 03:42
Why is that a rear wing Bend and not the rear suspension squat?
The grid lines are "fixed" to the camera. The camera and fin are both fixed to the car. Notice that the tip of the fin doesn't move vertically relative to the grid lines. Thus the only thing moving is the wing relative to the camera. This takes out the effect of the suspension squat and just shows the motion of the wing relative to the camera.
I see your point for RBR but for Alpine, it's just squatting! :mrgreen:

DarthPlagueisTheVise
42
Joined: 21 Sep 2020, 14:10

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Image
Technical Noob

nsr2000
0
Joined: 10 May 2018, 20:15

Re: Alpine A521

Post

:shock: Return of the big Engine Cover?

Owen.C93
171
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Alpine A521

Post

diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 08:03
Owen.C93 wrote:
19 May 2021, 07:17
diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 03:42


Why is that a rear wing Bend and not the rear suspension squat?
Because the wing and camera are fixed relative to each other via the body?
The camera is in that black horizontal tube about 4"(10 CMs) near the roll hoop. The rake fulcrum is the front wheels. The rear wing squat will travel much more the camera. Even so, the rear wing drop would still be apparent if they both dropped together.
If the grid lines were painted on a wall fixed the the ground behind the car then I agree. But the grid and the camera are essentially rigidly fixed together, which is why it can be used to measure the relative flex.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
diffuser
207
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Owen.C93 wrote:
19 May 2021, 19:41
diffuser wrote:
19 May 2021, 08:03
Owen.C93 wrote:
19 May 2021, 07:17


Because the wing and camera are fixed relative to each other via the body?
The camera is in that black horizontal tube about 4"(10 CMs) near the roll hoop. The rake fulcrum is the front wheels. The rear wing squat will travel much more the camera. Even so, the rear wing drop would still be apparent if they both dropped together.
If the grid lines were painted on a wall fixed the the ground behind the car then I agree. But the grid and the camera are essentially rigidly fixed together, which is why it can be used to measure the relative flex.

My argument, if I choose to accept it , would be...

From the side of the car, the distance between the floor and the ground where the camera is vs the distance from the floor to ground at rear wing, Must be half(rake).

Therefore where is that extra travel?

Queue in mission impossible theme music!

User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Gents, please note we now have a general rear wing flex topic.
Please us it ;)
Rear wing flex and FIA regulatory test 2021

User avatar
Blackout
1563
Joined: 09 Feb 2010, 04:12

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Image

Imola test floor is back in Monaco
Circle = 'standard' race spec
Yellow rectangle = Bahrain test spec
Green rectangle = Imola test spec
Image
Pics from Motorsport.com and Alpine

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: Alpine A521

Post

Driving analysis has been moved to the Team Thread. Keep it about the Car in here please. ;)
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

Post Reply