Williams FW31

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Michiba
Michiba
4
Joined: 28 Apr 2008, 08:58

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Pedro wrote:Suzuka - new brake duct with winglet

It is not just for brakes cooling, it serves as an aero-device now too. This wing with two vertical endplates increases downforce at front.

Image

More info: http://www.f1news.cz/technika/33338-zme ... -zbrojeni/
More technical articles: http://www.f1news.cz/technika/
This might be a stupid question, but how does adding downforce on unsprung mass help the performance?

User avatar
ISLAMATRON
0
Joined: 01 Oct 2008, 18:29

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Rear wings used to be mounted to the uprights, it actually works the same or better, that way the 3rd(heave) spring is not really necessary.

mx_tifoso
mx_tifoso
0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006, 05:01
Location: North America

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Didn't it flex with the vertical independent wheel travel? Or were the connections designed to allow that?
Forum guide: read before posting

"You do it, then it's done." - Kimi Räikkönen

Por las buenas soy amigo, por las malas soy campeón.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Williams FW31

Post

mx_tifosi wrote:Didn't it flex with the vertical independent wheel travel? Or were the connections designed to allow that?
It did flexed and it crashed often. That's why it was banned.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Williams FW31

Post

mx_tifosi wrote:What could be the reason(s) for not introducing enough significant upgrades? Financial ? Or just lack of will power/proactivenes?
It wasnt finance, Patrick head said so many times this season. Resources, and brain power maybes about a 50/50 split either way, Eddie Jordan said at Abu that he feels that the Williams has one of the "poorer" resource bases in F1, basically meaning they dont have the computer power they would otherwise like to have. As for brainpower, i think that Williams need a stronger design team, and with the pull out of BMW and Toyota from the sport there is a few strong engineers and designers going arround now so this could solve their problem.

I feel that if they got a strong head designer and a stronger design team arround him with slightly better computing power, all whitch would require some serious or good/wise investment, i think that with their heritage and knowlege base they can become a race winning team again.

Also, they have the drivers that can win a race or two, Rubens is a proven winner and Hulkenberg is a future WDC.

i70q7m7ghw
i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: Williams FW31

Post

ESPImperium wrote: Also, they have the drivers that can win a race or two, Rubens is a proven winner and Hulkenberg is a future WDC.
Agreed about Rubens. Complete trash about Hulkenberg, we won't know until he races. Nelson Piquet Jr. was also tipped as a future WDC, we all know how that ended up.

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Williams should join folding@home or something similar and get their supercomputer for free. Is that not feasible?

There is a lot of CPU power there, and I would gladly dedicate my 15ghz worth of cores idle time to any F1 team that wanted it. While I am at work they already are thinking about cancer, seti, and genetics.

Snow Leopard has open_cl, which with code that supports it allows your GPU and CPU to work together on the math, and mac people are nerdy about their folding.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Diesel wrote:
ESPImperium wrote: Also, they have the drivers that can win a race or two, Rubens is a proven winner and Hulkenberg is a future WDC.
Agreed about Rubens. Complete trash about Hulkenberg, we won't know until he races. Nelson Piquet Jr. was also tipped as a future WDC, we all know how that ended up.
Hulkenberg has at least done as well as Lewis leading upto now :)
- Axle

Giblet
Giblet
5
Joined: 19 Mar 2007, 01:47
Location: Canada

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Cripes the guy is building his own car :)

How are you feeling about your new appointment?

I’m pretty excited to be racing for Williams. They’re real racers. I’ve been with the team as a test driver for two years now so I know everyone well. I’ve also been working in the factory itself this year with stints in composites, the wind tunnel and sub-assembly. I like the people and the atmosphere within the factory is really good. I’m now in a race seat and I’m really looking forward to next year.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute

axle
axle
3
Joined: 22 Jun 2004, 14:45
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Giblet wrote:Cripes the guy is building his own car :)

How are you feeling about your new appointment?

I’m pretty excited to be racing for Williams. They’re real racers. I’ve been with the team as a test driver for two years now so I know everyone well. I’ve also been working in the factory itself this year with stints in composites, the wind tunnel and sub-assembly. I like the people and the atmosphere within the factory is really good. I’m now in a race seat and I’m really looking forward to next year.
:lol: maybe he's hedging his bets on which career path to go down!
- Axle

bazanaius
bazanaius
0
Joined: 08 Feb 2008, 17:16

Re: Williams FW31

Post

This is seriously useful - a driver who actually knows how the car works must be really useful. There are a few promising drivers around who have technical backgrounds - Oliver Turvey comes to mind, who completed his bachelors in Engineering at Cambridge.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
64
Joined: 06 Apr 2008, 00:08
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Nico Rosberg has a engineering qualification or something as well. He has said it helps him more able to set the car up a little quicker than the norm, and able to comunicate with the engineers better as he talks in their language.

That with the master of setting up a car, Rubens, i think that the FW32 can potentially be a quick car, but only if the design team and resources are up to scratch, compaired to the rest of the teams.

Altho, Williams seem to have a better CFD platform than BMW Sauber and Renault (who arguably have the 2 best supercomputers in F1) going on the 2009 car and points. Altho that could have been better if they had Kimui and not Kazuki.

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Michiba wrote:This might be a stupid question, but how does adding downforce on unsprung mass help the performance?
:)

That is the best place to add it!


Then you are pushing the wheels directly into the ground, and you do not have to worry about bottoming out the car.

Back in the day teams had two entire "chassis" - an unsprung one generating downforce, and a sprung one containing the car mechanicals... meant they could run loads of downforce on a lovely soft suspension for mechanical grip.

kilcoo316
kilcoo316
21
Joined: 09 Mar 2005, 16:45
Location: Kilcoo, Ireland

Re: Williams FW31

Post

Giblet wrote:Williams should join folding@home or something similar and get their supercomputer for free. Is that not feasible?
Nah.

CFD needs very fast and very frequent access to a large dataset.


Folding proteins can be done independently.


It fundamentally just wouldn't work.

roost89
roost89
0
Joined: 10 Apr 2008, 19:34
Location: Highlands, Scotland

Re: Williams FW31

Post

For all those that have asked in the past:
Image
Courtesy of Rubens on Twitter
"It could be done manually. It would take quite a while, but it could be done. There is however a much more efficient and accurate way of getting the data. Men with lasers." Wing Commander Andy Green