Whatever makes you happy!NathanOlder wrote:Yeah, that'll do nicely =D>
Hamilton's fastest lap was on a set of tyres that were 25 laps old! But otherwise that's all true, there was a lot of tactical driving going on between the two at the front. Kimi close Hamilton down but certainly wasn't going flat out at that point because, as you point out, he went quicker in the previous stint with more fuel and older tyres.Ral wrote:Yeah, but Raikkonen's fastest lap was on tyres over 20 laps old indicating he too could have gone faster in his last stint. Although Adam Cooper did a review of the race in the subscriber's section of Autosport.com and he says Raikkonen's mediums weren't new but rather a scrubbed set.
Which still doesn't give a definitive answer as to which of the two was fastest per se, just means they were both not going as fast as they could, for different reasons.
I don't think it was kobayashi who turned his engine offrichard_leeds wrote:Thanks for the quote. Shame people slammed the Merc team for letting Schumacher down when in fact it was a mistake by Koabayashi.
People line up behind the cars in front of themNando wrote:It was deifnitely a mistake by Schumacher.
He can blame Koba all he want but it´s his job to make sure he´s in the right spot, not Koba.
He turned off his engine coz of over heatingsimieski wrote:I don't think it was kobayashi who turned his engine offrichard_leeds wrote:Thanks for the quote. Shame people slammed the Merc team for letting Schumacher down when in fact it was a mistake by Koabayashi.
With ref to the eng overheat...
Considering that Schumacher was one of the last drivers on the grid this lends itself to a car issue or either an improper parade lap in car procedure causing the overheat.