Red Bull exceed fuel flow limit, Ricciardo DSQ at Australian GP

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Locked
User avatar
nace84
0
Joined: 11 Oct 2013, 12:20

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

The 100kg/hr is the maximum amount, but you can't race 100% all the time. while braking you have maybe 5kg/hr...so at the end it all works out in average consumption :wink:

mnmracer
-26
Joined: 17 Sep 2011, 23:41

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

You're allowed to travel 100 miles on a highway.
You're not allowed to travel 100 miles per hour on a highway.

dave34m
-1
Joined: 04 Aug 2008, 10:46

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

turbof1 wrote:You have to make a distinction between the2:
-The fuel rate applies at any given moment: so you aren't allowed during a given time moment A to spend more fuel then 100kg/h, 1,66kg/m, 27.778g/s,... .
-On top of that, you aren't allowed to spend more then 100kg of during an entire race (start to chequered flag).

What does that mean? Well the first is better to be looked at as the peak fuel consumption rate. It is expressed in kg/h, but isn't about what you are allowed to spend in a hour, but a fuel rate you are never allowed to go above. It might be a bit clearer if you take as grams per second. It's still the same rate though.
The second is your maximum consumption from the start of the race (the moment the green lights turn on) to the crossing of the chequered flag. So it doesn't matter if the race is a hour, 1.5 hours, 2 hours,... . You have 100kg to do that. Do note this does not include installation laps, formation lap, in lap after crossing the flag and fuel sample.
So they are carrying more than 100kg of fuel when they leave the pits, roughly how much would they need to carry?


User avatar
thomin
3
Joined: 23 Feb 2012, 15:57

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

Ultra_Tech wrote:
basti313 wrote:
Ultra_Tech wrote:How can red bull get away with anything. Whatever the circumstances, if they gained a performance advantage by going over the agreed limit, then they have to be sanctioned.
The fuel flow sensors are double checked with the fuel consumption calculated by the McLaren standard ECU because the standard ECU still is more precise than the fuel flow sensor. This was announced before the race.
I have another question, Adam Cooper has said that the teams were told the only mitigating circumstances for violating this rule was a faulty FIA sensor.

Am I right when it seems that Red Bull changed the sensor in Parc Ferme this weekend?

Let me know because if so and that is the case, i consider that highly suspect that a team would do that, almost as if they were planning to exceed the limit and then use the faulty sensor arguement as a backup.

I dont know if this is the case....just going on some chatter online?
https://twitter.com/nh247/status/445147201879429120

feni_remmen
3
Joined: 26 Mar 2009, 15:43

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

I guess they are currently aurguing that 100kg/hour is not the same as 50 kg/30 minutes... Different to 25 kg/15 minutes too... 1.67 kg /minute anybody?

tim|away
15
Joined: 03 Jul 2013, 17:46

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

feni_remmen wrote:I guess they are currently aurguing that 100kg/hour is not the same as 50 kg/30 minutes... Different to 25 kg/15 minutes too... 1.67 kg /minute anybody?
How would that not be the same?

pyrosian
0
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 23:57

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

If you used 100kg in 30 mins and nothing for the next 30mins your fuel flow is 100kg an hour is it not?

SidSidney
18
Joined: 30 Jan 2014, 01:34
Location: Racetracks around the world

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

I posted this info 4 minutes before this tweet, top of last page. Hi Nick!
This signature is encrypted to avoid complaints, but it makes me laugh out loud:-
16S75 13E7K 41C53 7CT23 14O5O 67R32 76175 90B67 L4L42 41O63 72W56 98M10 52E87

henra
53
Joined: 11 Mar 2012, 19:34

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

feni_remmen wrote:I guess they are currently aurguing that 100kg/hour is not the same as 50 kg/30 minutes... Different to 25 kg/15 minutes too... 1.67 kg /minute anybody?
No, if I understood it correctly the problem is that the flow meter sets a flag if the flow exceeds the allowed value for 1/10 second.
It appeared some teams had fluctuations in the fuel flow that would set off the flag. The real (average) fuel flow could well be within the legal range but you would get a frequent flow of 'flags' signalling exceeding of allwoed fuel flow.
The FIA aopparently has consequently increased the measuring interval to 0.2s to reduce susceptibility to these fluctuations and at the same time asked the Engine suplliers to adapt their Software accordingly.
That's where obviously something went wrong with the Renault engines of both RB cars.
In the case of Vettels car it seems the PU 'protested' the new software completely by not delivering any meaningfull power. Ricciardo appears to have been struck more subtlely.
It seems to ne Renault is still on thin ice, software wise.
Last edited by henra on 16 Mar 2014, 13:18, edited 1 time in total.

NTS
NTS
2
Joined: 02 Oct 2013, 19:31

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

pyrosian wrote:If you used 100kg in 30 mins and nothing for the next 30mins your fuel flow is 100kg an hour is it not?
The rules are written as to not allow a fuel flow of over 100kg/h at any given time, so it's specified as "in every instant", not "30 minutes over and then 30 minutes under". However since in practical terms you cannot measure "in every instant" they have decided to use a certain sampling frequency. On the previous page someone mentioned it is 5 readings / second. So basically the practical fuel-flow limit is 5.56 gram/ 0.2 sec, since that's the window they are policing.

Sevach
1045
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

pyrosian wrote:If you used 100kg in 30 mins and nothing for the next 30mins your fuel flow is 100kg an hour is it not?
Rules dictate 100kg/h as maximum rate of fuel flow, you can't go over that not even for a second (at least you are not suppoused to), doesn't matter if you ran with less than that the rest of the time.

RBR probably ran a significant portion of the race under 100kg/h.

dave34m
-1
Joined: 04 Aug 2008, 10:46

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

pyrosian wrote:If you used 100kg in 30 mins and nothing for the next 30mins your fuel flow is 100kg an hour is it not?
If you did 100mph for 5 minutes and stopped for 5 minutes would that reduce you maximum speed to 50mph

tim|away
15
Joined: 03 Jul 2013, 17:46

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

NTS wrote:
pyrosian wrote:If you used 100kg in 30 mins and nothing for the next 30mins your fuel flow is 100kg an hour is it not?
The rules are written as to not allow a fuel flow of over 100kg/h at any given time, so it's specified as "in every instant", not "30 minutes over and then 30 minutes under". However since in practical terms you cannot measure "in every instant" they have decided to use a certain sampling frequency. On the previous page someone mentioned it is 5 readings / second. So basically the practical fuel-flow limit is 5.56 gram/ 0.2 sec, since that's the window they are policing.
Where did you get that?

The official article is:
5.1.4 Fuel mass flow must not exceed 100kg/h.

User avatar
Bomber_Pilot
20
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 14:19

Re: 2014 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne 13-16th March

Post

You have 100kg of fuel available to you. You have a MAX, not average fuel flow rate of 100l/h. That means you can run at max ffr for one hour and finish the race parked at the side of the track, or you destribute the fuel throuought the race. So... if you don't need the power you tune the ffr down a bit and if you need it you go at higher ffr. But i doubt that there is a chance of exploiting a ffr of 100l/h for a "longish" period of time. With five laps to go, Magnussen was told to save some fuel and then use fuel rate number three to try get past Ricciardo on the final two laps. Brundle then explained, that Mclaren have a range from one to twelve, with one being the highest and twelve the lowest.

Locked