lebesset wrote:but you notice I referred to high performance vehicles which is where Pirelli have a big market share ; whereas vehicle manufacturers have to accept what tyre manufacturers offer in the 'family' market , they will pay extra to get the product which enhances their premium high performance offerings
I know, I was thinking about high perfomance too, specifically about Veyron´s tires, designed specifically for the car by Michelin
Anycase this discussion is going out of proportion, I only tried to reply strad who mentioned Pirelli longer experience as a crucial factor to lean the balance or not considering Michelin as a Pirelli replacement. I only mentioned many people, from family users like myself to top car manufacturers like Bugatti or racing engineers, do prefer Michelin. It was just an example I was not pretending a pirelli-michelin debate
lebesset wrote:so unless you have the test results for your car [ which I no longer do now that I am retired ]
No I have not, but I´ve always enjoied doing comparisons so now I´m jelous about your former job
But since I like doing comparisons I´ve tested most tire manufacturers for my car to learn the differences. I noticed even when Michelin is not the brand with the highest grip level, it is the one wich last longer from those with very good grip level (Michelin, Pirelli, GoodYear wich is the best in wet conditions by far, Continental wich was a nice surprise to me...). There are tires with lower wear but many are like a piece of wood, and there are tires with better grip but they can´t match Michelin mileage. IMHO they´re the better balanced tires. For normal cars at least, I´ve never own a high perfomance car
lebesset wrote: why buy michelin just because they make the size ? maybe when the tests were done michelin were not approved as an OE fitment because they skewed their design towards a particular customer ; let me give you an example ....2 manufacturers in the same country using the same tyre size , one on a FWD car , the other RWD ; one said that the steering response was too sensitive , the other that it was too insensitive !
I'am afraid it is much more complicated than you suggest !
I don´t like to generalize, but you´re right I did it here too easily. It´s probably due to my opinion at the respect of current F1 tires... they´re crap! I know FIA has a big part of the responsability, but tires wich cannot be pushed hard and even so they last few laps... they´re artificially sweetening F1 and I hate it. With tires wich force drivers to drive well below the limit driver role is at its minimum ever. What´s the point of a fast driver who can go to the limit constantly without making mistakes (wich is the advantage of the greatests), when tires don´t allow that and all drivers must go at similar pace?
I really hate this.
End of rant, sorry for the OT