GPR-A wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 16:31
When I read the comments on this particular thread, I can't help but notice a compulsive obsession to see a fight for championship to go down till the last race, at an insane expectation/wish of seeing a lead driver failing to finish a race, meeting with some kind of misfortune that takes that driver out of the championship contention itself and what not. It's like, if a sprinter has taken a healthy lead, the audience is desperately expecting that sprinter to trip down so that chasing pack comes near and then get up and run, so that the fight goes down to last step in that sprint. Amazing.
A fight is worth the entertainment, when it just naturally happens to be A FIGHT. Not because misfortune handicaps a driver, even worse, when people GENUINELY WISH the hard working individual to meet misfortune for the sake of A FIGHT.
It was a pity to see Schumacher lose the title in 2006 due to a misfortune, it was a pity to see Hamilton lose the contest in 2012 due to loads of misfortune, it was a pity to see Alonso lose 2012 contest due to some misfortune, it was a pity to see Hamilton lose the battle in 2016 due to misfortune and IT IS INDEED a pity to see Vettel's chances having gotten reduced in the battle due to misfortune this year. But it would be sick to see people expecting to see misfortune to befell on a driver, just to have A FIGHT.
This thread has provided a great example of cognitive dissonance on the part of some. I now see a comment about how Ferrari were on average faster than Mercedes during this race.
Honestly, when one point fails, another is manufactured to try to shorten the factual distance between Hamilton and Vettel in favour of the belief they are neck and neck. At no point has there been any interaction with the data - it's pure, unsubstantiated bias with every post.
Go and look at the data and you come to the conclusion I drew after Singapore; Hamilton winning fairly comfortably, unless he has seriously bad luck.
This race was a great microcosm of the season in my opinion. Hamilton has enough in hand to control races. He qualifies in front, he usually leads into the first corner. If Ferrari try to go aggressive, they run out of rubber and have to take an extra stop, or slow down at the end. If they try to lean out their tyres, Mercedes are simply 0.2 - 0.4 seconds a lap faster anyway.
It's frustrating that the championship has become stale so close to the end, but facts are facts. Reality distortion fields won't change the fact this one is over, barring the most unprecedented collapse ever witnessed in F1.