You are right with Hungary but at Silverstone... full throtle passage... change of direction at high speed... high speed corners... Max out... they should have taken massive massive points to Ferrari. There were no slow speed corners, no 90 degrees corners... no twisty stuff for mechanical grip... even with Ricciardo they should have beten Ferrari because of the characteristics of the track... what I cant understand if how is posible that updating the car almost every race while Ferrari on full swing on 2022 car they cand beat Ferrari on a track like Silverstone.mclaren111 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 12:15mclaren_mircea wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 08:57Please stop with Mclaren as a favorite for Spa. Im masivelly dissapointed of them. Ferrari stopped all the development of the car very early in spring while Mclaren updated the car almost every race and despite this and the power of the Mercedes engines they are on level points. I thought Mclaren this year will be at the top of their game but as usually they finish in their own way... very ,,Mclarenesque"... I hope and I think that only at Monza they will be strong.
I think you're a bit harsh on the team... Hungary was no fault of our own... Ricciardo's troubles seems to be improving ...
Our car is good and getting the right setup for the remaining races is critical & there is every reason to think we can beat Ferrari...
The drivers can see a lot of this stuff, I imagine it's just the engineers reminding them of it. I'd be all for making the drivers do more, but the cars are so complex now I think it's unrealistic.Stu wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 13:33To be honest I would be including live data streaming from car to pit during a race within that limit, teams would still be able to download data directly from the car during a pit stop. This would work even better if there were a limit on the number of pit-crew able to ‘service’ the car during a stop, maybe by half? - that would make it possible to pit both of a teams cars together without ‘stacking’ and lead to inter-team battlesSiLo wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 12:26I mean there is only so much they can learn from this, it just gives them a list of actions to take based on what happens in the race.Stu wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 09:38I wonder how long it will take the FIA/F1 to work out that when it is very difficult for teams to predict conditions their ability to “iterate the hell out of” possibilities in their simulations becomes almost impossible and put a limit on computer usage over a season (much as there is for wind tunnel/CFD); that could/would/should improve the show and place a lot of emphasis on trackside race engineering again.
Looking forward to a good GP!!
It should be possible for the on-board software to alert a driver to what is important for him/her.
Drivers are currently being coached on tyre temperature, brake temperature and cooling issues from the pits.
Agree to disagree then. Imo, low speed sensitivity to the car has nothing to do with aero as the car is not going fast enough to generate the downforce to utilize the power available. Certainly at higher speed it’s there, but the men are separated from the boys in the rain during the acceleration phase and med to low speed corner phase which are basically constant because the speed of the cars are so much lower in general no matter the track when it rains. Getting to that high speed advantage is the portion that the driver makes a huge difference, and the better ones can do that more effectively simply because they have a a higher talent level. We’ll see how the boys do this weekend but my guess is the better ones will again rise to the top and won’t make stupid mistakes. Driver errors are exaggerated in the rain as the better ones make less mistakes — another great measure rain conditions reveal: which driver handles pressure more effectively...which has nothing to do with aero or power but rather, skill and competence.kalinka wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 12:40Agree.basti313 wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 09:56This is something I doubt more and more for tracks like Spa, COTA or Monza.
On a track like Hungary we see the effect of the straight getting short and a stronger engine not having a real benefit as the full throttle time is low. But on tracks with long straights you have such a long full throttle time, that no matter if it rains or not, the time benefit of a stronger engine is there no matter if it is dry or moist.
Additionally the one with a stronger engine can afford to use more dirty down force without getting such a big problem on the straight once it gets more dry during the race.
Spa is the track where a team with a weaker engine can successfully trade some downforce for top speed without loosing too much laptime..but again if it rains they will be slaughtered by cars with strong engine/high downforce.
It can only work on a dry track.
Exactly. The drivers are hired to drive the car, just as the mechanics are hired to build/fix it. What next? Require the mechanics to fix the car from memory?
I bet they probably already do that ...
True, but I bet they discuss issues between themselves and the senior engineers, which is what I meant. Mea culpa for the confusion.
You could remove a lot of the sensors from the cars.Stu wrote: ↑25 Aug 2021, 09:38I wonder how long it will take the FIA/F1 to work out that when it is very difficult for teams to predict conditions their ability to “iterate the hell out of” possibilities in their simulations becomes almost impossible and put a limit on computer usage over a season (much as there is for wind tunnel/CFD); that could/would/should improve the show and place a lot of emphasis on trackside race engineering again.
Looking forward to a good GP!!
I'm a fan of his on track but the guy does dress like a total twonk at times!
I'm glad its not only me that thinks so, thought it was an age/kool thingJust_a_fan wrote: ↑26 Aug 2021, 22:16I'm a fan of his on track but the guy does dress like a total twonk at times!