I'm afraid autosport.com summed up the race very accurately:
"Massa got cleanly away in the lead from pole position, while his front row partner Hamilton had to work hard to fend off Kubica into the first corner. The top trio then settle into that order for the rest of the afternoon."
I hope and pray that next year's rules will re-introduce
racing. I love Ferrari, but would rather see them finish second in a close race than lead a procession devoid of competition.
My mother-in-law walked into the room and asked,
"What's this."
I said, "A race."
"A
race? Where are the other cars?"
"The leader is ahead by about 8 seconds."
"8 seconds?! You call
that a race?"
Well, she's 92, but not senile!
Earlier this year there was a good bit of discussion about Vettel replacing Massa. I later said Massa was the best #2 in F1, but he'd never be a team leader.
Massa has dominated the last two races in a manner reminiscent of Jim Clark (1 or 2 of you will remember him?) He simply disappears at the start and it's game over (if the engine lasts!)
It looks like Kimi has achieved his goal: WDC. He hasn't officially
retired, but one might say that he has
quit racing. The disparity between his and Massa's performance is astonishing.
On engines: Speed TV announcers said repeatedly that the belief in pit lane is that McL has a 25 HP advantage. . . .
Enzo Ferrari was a great man. But he was not a good man. -- Phil Hill