Did you only read the headline of that article?? I didn't post this article because it mentions Lotus breaking the rules. I posted it because of this section :iotar__ wrote:You're kidding right? Everyone knows what filming day is for, no one cares. It's a rubbish article by a joke blog/site but if they want to play:Holm86 wrote:Dont be too quick. Look at this article.turbof1 wrote:So I guess I owe the Lotus team an apology. Not only did they hire off a track for their own, which I believe all in all was more costly then joining the official 4-day test, but they also got better running then any other renault-engined team. Lotus has to be thinking "guess who's laughing now?".
Good job Lotus.
http://gptoday.com/full_story/view/4779 ... _at_Jerez/
In light of Jerez tests the very fact of running on track and announcing it is enough to consider event "promotional", thus fulfilling all spirit of the rules requirements. It's a promotion through "positive" news , no need for filming or pictures. It worked, didn't it?
And if this is true then they didn't do that well as they want us to believe. I don't care if they broke the regulations or not. That's another discussion.However a source, who works at Jerez and was present at the two day event, revealed that on the first day [Friday] the E22 “hardly ran at all and only emerged from the pit garage late in the day.”
On Saturday the E22 “did do around 20 laps” with either Maldonado or Romain Grosjean in the cockpit. But according to the source the E22 was “not running at testing or racing speeds [and was] actually very slow at times” on the second day, and “runs were limited to a few lap” stints at a time.
What I talk about is that the source mentions very slow lap times. And stints of only a couple of laps.Pup wrote:100km at Jerez would be 22 laps, so if they did one on the first day, it means they did 21 on the second.
That doesn't mean they couldn't have done more. I'd be surprised if they couldn't. After all, they're benefitting from everything that Renault learned in Jerez, plus the updates they've made since then. If Caterham was able to do 54 laps at the end of Jerez, then we know the engine is capable of at least that.
If you only have 20 laps to play with and want to try a few things then you would have to do several short runs. With regards how fast they were running, it's an initial shakedown. None of the teams at the Jerez test would've been running full blast straight out of the box.Holm86 wrote:What I talk about is that the source mentions very slow lap times. And stints of only a couple of laps.Pup wrote:100km at Jerez would be 22 laps, so if they did one on the first day, it means they did 21 on the second.
That doesn't mean they couldn't have done more. I'd be surprised if they couldn't. After all, they're benefitting from everything that Renault learned in Jerez, plus the updates they've made since then. If Caterham was able to do 54 laps at the end of Jerez, then we know the engine is capable of at least that.
more like they lost everyone! , oops it's team thread stuff sry