Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
MtthsMlw
1033
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Renault admitted that they reached 1000hp this year during short periods of time in Qualifying. 950hp in the race with a margin to 970 for overtaking.

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... t-1000-ps/

What I also found interesting:
The regulations allow a maximum fuel flow of 100 kilograms per hour. However, there is a small margin for error. And Renault takes advantage of that.

The measuring device in the tank (Fuel Flow Meter) is exposed to certain resonances due to the movement of the racing car on the race track. Due to the vibrations and oscillations, the rules allow small outliers to move upwards. The maximum fuel flow rate may exceed 100 kilograms by three grams. That sounds like little, but it is obviously the decisive bit of room for manoeuvre in injection. "The increased flow rate is only effective for a very short time, then you have to be below it again," says Taffin. "Otherwise you won't reach 100 kilos on average."

McMika98
-24
Joined: 18 Feb 2017, 22:40

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

MtthsMlw wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 17:29
Renault admitted that they reached 1000hp this year during short periods of time in Qualifying. 950hp in the race with a margin to 970 for overtaking.


What I also found interesting:
The regulations allow a maximum fuel flow of 100 kilograms per hour. However, there is a small margin for error. And Renault takes advantage of that.

The maximum fuel flow rate may exceed 100 kilograms by three grams. That sounds like little, but it is obviously the decisive bit of room for manoeuvre in injection. "The increased flow rate is only effective for a very short time, then you have to be below it again," says Taffin. "Otherwise you won't reach 100 kilos on average."
So basically they can get 1000hp for brief period by going over the fuel flow regulation. Interesting that Honda were the only engine to be penalised this season for going over the limit. I suspect all teams have something up their sleeve now.

gokarter
-14
Joined: 14 Jun 2019, 05:30

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

So basically they can get 1000hp for brief period by going over the fuel flow regulation. Interesting that Honda were the only engine to be penalised this season for going over the limit. I suspect all teams have something up their sleeve now
.

shame display by FIA, horner said honda engine exceeded the limit by 0.02grams but renault say they can go up to 0.03grams and without a penalty. wow. FIA is a joke. I hope redbull and honda check everything FIA does, because its unfair

Benii6
3
Joined: 03 Feb 2018, 16:32

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

gokarter wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 20:18
So basically they can get 1000hp for brief period by going over the fuel flow regulation. Interesting that Honda were the only engine to be penalised this season for going over the limit. I suspect all teams have something up their sleeve now
.

shame display by FIA, horner said honda engine exceeded the limit by 0.02grams but renault say they can go up to 0.03grams and without a penalty. wow. FIA is a joke. I hope redbull and honda check everything FIA does, because its unfair
You're a joke.

0.02 grams? Really!? It's either 2 grams or 0.002 kgs. And clearly there's a way to ''legaly'' exceed the limit through unreliability of the sensor. While sensor on Honda's engine showed illegal value, Renault's didn't. That's why RB was penilized.

But probably you're right. FIA has it against Honda.

User avatar
subcritical71
90
Joined: 17 Jul 2018, 20:04
Location: USA-Florida

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Benii6 wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 20:40
gokarter wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 20:18
So basically they can get 1000hp for brief period by going over the fuel flow regulation. Interesting that Honda were the only engine to be penalised this season for going over the limit. I suspect all teams have something up their sleeve now
.

shame display by FIA, horner said honda engine exceeded the limit by 0.02grams but renault say they can go up to 0.03grams and without a penalty. wow. FIA is a joke. I hope redbull and honda check everything FIA does, because its unfair
You're a joke.

0.02 grams? Really!? It's either 2 grams or 0.002 kgs. And clearly there's a way to ''legaly'' exceed the limit through unreliability of the sensor. While sensor on Honda's engine showed illegal value, Renault's didn't. That's why RB was penilized.
I’m with Benii6 on this one. Once you know the error of the sensor you can exploit it. If the fuel flow sensor reads one value and the total injector flow reads another value then it’s quite easy to work out your deficit. Now if the numbers work out the wrong way they’d be fitting another sensor. I’d be very surprised if all teams were not doing this. The fuel spec also has pretty large bands from the allowed value, I’m sure the lubricants suppliers are using up all of that allowance to their benefit. Nothing wrong with that.

User avatar
Pyrone89
14
Joined: 05 Jul 2019, 21:44

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Yeah Renault and the HP numbers they speak of. As a RB fan I know to be skeptical
True GOATs don’t need the help of superior material to win.

Tom Brady, Usain Bolt are true GOATs.

63l8qrrfy6
368
Joined: 17 Feb 2016, 21:36

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

subcritical71 wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 20:53
I’m with Benii6 on this one. Once you know the error of the sensor you can exploit it. If the fuel flow sensor reads one value and the total injector flow reads another value then it’s quite easy to work out your deficit. Now if the numbers work out the wrong way they’d be fitting another sensor. I’d be very surprised if all teams were not doing this. The fuel spec also has pretty large bands from the allowed value, I’m sure the lubricants suppliers are using up all of that allowance to their benefit. Nothing wrong with that.
Of course they all exploit it. It's still probably peanuts compared to the instantaneous flow rates they used to achieve back when fuel high pressure side hydraulic compliance wasn't regulated.

I hear fuel flow meters are provided by this company:
https://www.sentronics.com/

GhostF1
110
Joined: 30 Aug 2016, 04:11

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Pyrone89 wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 21:09
Yeah Renault and the HP numbers they speak of. As a RB fan I know to be skeptical
This. Cyril has claimed they breached the 1000ho mark last year as well and that back then there was less than 15hp between themselves and Mercedes... They are the only manufacturer to spout numbers out publicly to compare themselves.
I have less than zero trust for Renault when it comes to claimed outputs.. so I'd take anything they have to say specifically about that, with several grains of salt.

FPV GTHO
8
Joined: 22 Mar 2016, 05:57

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

gokarter wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 20:18
So basically they can get 1000hp for brief period by going over the fuel flow regulation. Interesting that Honda were the only engine to be penalised this season for going over the limit. I suspect all teams have something up their sleeve now
.

shame display by FIA, horner said honda engine exceeded the limit by 0.02grams but renault say they can go up to 0.03grams and without a penalty. wow. FIA is a joke. I hope redbull and honda check everything FIA does, because its unfair
If Honda went 2 grams over the limit, the obvious conclusion is they went 5 grams over 100kg/h, if the limit is 100kg/h, +/- 3 grams.

Maplesoup
18
Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 19:25

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 23:24
subcritical71 wrote:
30 Jul 2019, 20:53
I’m with Benii6 on this one. Once you know the error of the sensor you can exploit it. If the fuel flow sensor reads one value and the total injector flow reads another value then it’s quite easy to work out your deficit. Now if the numbers work out the wrong way they’d be fitting another sensor. I’d be very surprised if all teams were not doing this. The fuel spec also has pretty large bands from the allowed value, I’m sure the lubricants suppliers are using up all of that allowance to their benefit. Nothing wrong with that.
Of course they all exploit it. It's still probably peanuts compared to the instantaneous flow rates they used to achieve back when fuel high pressure side hydraulic compliance wasn't regulated.

I hear fuel flow meters are provided by this company:
https://www.sentronics.com/
Teams actually buy entire batches of fuel flow meters, then they test them all to see which give the most flow vs the actual reading the meter outputs and use just those ones.

Honda probably got penalized because they were 2 grams over the acceptable limit, so if 3 grams is the limit they must of hit 5 instead.

saviour stivala
48
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

“The increased flow rate is only effective for a very short time, then you have to be below it again, otherwise you won’t reach 100kg on average”.
Honda was penalized because they went over the permitted average.
Renault/RB knows what its like and how its done.

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Can anyone assist please? the flow is measured with ultrasound and time (am I correct so far?)
If the density and 'speed' of flow gives the total, does sound in the form of vibration in the fuel or line affect this reading?
For example as all the engines have differing characteristics, vibrations and harmonics, would they all give identical reading? Is there a set of circumstances where vibration or harmonics (or, if someone was not straight, an electronic device) would give a faster time to the sound wave, (like for instance air bubbles bled out before the injector)


The total used would ofcorse show it up if it was used more than a little.
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

User avatar
subcritical71
90
Joined: 17 Jul 2018, 20:04
Location: USA-Florida

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Big Tea wrote:
31 Jul 2019, 20:59
Can anyone assist please? the flow is measured with ultrasound and time (am I correct so far?)
If the density and 'speed' of flow gives the total, does sound in the form of vibration in the fuel or line affect this reading?
For example as all the engines have differing characteristics, vibrations and harmonics, would they all give identical reading? Is there a set of circumstances where vibration or harmonics (or, if someone was not straight, an electronic device) would give a faster time to the sound wave, (like for instance air bubbles bled out before the injector)


The total used would ofcorse show it up if it was used more than a little.
The Gill sensors use the Doppler effect. One way of eliminating any off-sensor interference would be to introduce a two frequency signal which the sensor would then be looking for that specific Doppler shift. Sort of like pulse-compression (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_compression

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

subcritical71 wrote:
31 Jul 2019, 22:25
Big Tea wrote:
31 Jul 2019, 20:59
Can anyone assist please? the flow is measured with ultrasound and time (am I correct so far?)
If the density and 'speed' of flow gives the total, does sound in the form of vibration in the fuel or line affect this reading?
For example as all the engines have differing characteristics, vibrations and harmonics, would they all give identical reading? Is there a set of circumstances where vibration or harmonics (or, if someone was not straight, an electronic device) would give a faster time to the sound wave, (like for instance air bubbles bled out before the injector)


The total used would ofcorse show it up if it was used more than a little.
The Gill sensors use the Doppler effect. One way of eliminating any off-sensor interference would be to introduce a two frequency signal which the sensor would then be looking for that specific Doppler shift. Sort of like pulse-compression (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_compression
Ah, I assumed it would be 'gps' style with signal delay timed. Must be very complicate gear, which makes sense when you consider some of the tricks that have been used
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

gruntguru
563
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 07:43

Re: Renault Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

3 grams? Are you guys kidding? The fuel flow can momentarily spike to 100.003 kg/hr? Wow - that's worth a whole 0.03 hp.

If there is any truth in the 3 grams figure perhaps it is grams/second ie 10.8 kg/hr? Hmmm that seems a bit much - about 108 hp.

g/min? - that would be 1.8 hp.
je suis charlie

Post Reply