Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
roon
roon
449
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 6:04 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Is that the IC hanging off the front? Above the orange wires. Rarely get to see that. The ribbing reminds me of plate type heat exchangers.

Image

Image

User avatar
subcritical71
89
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 7:04 pm
Location: USA-Florida

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

roon wrote:
Mon Jun 10, 2019 7:09 pm
Is that the IC hanging off the front? Above the orange wires. Rarely get to see that. The ribbing reminds me of plate type heat exchangers.

https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1HmeqmOqA ... -Model.jpg

http://www.ptp-tech.com/images/funke_br ... angers.png
Dunno, but a plate type HX would make sense as it could be tuned to the required cooling requirements quite easily.

User avatar
Mudflap
221
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Some fresh goss from Merc engineers:

Stroll's failure was a faulty sparkplug causing misfire which eventually took out the cylinder.

Andy Cowell has stated in the post-Canada debrief that Ferrari clearly have more power and Renault have caught up with them. Honda still a bit behind.

Their brand new single cylinder research engine fired up this week. This is the first update since the start of the turbo era.

Lorenzo Sassi who joined from Ferrari as a chief engineer was demoted to head of department.
How much TQ does it make though?

roon
roon
449
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 6:04 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Misfire as in detonation? Or wear/damage to some part exposed to an oil channel, perhaps.

Sassi demoted while at Merc, or his tranfer to Merc was considered a demotion?

User avatar
Mudflap
221
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Misfire as it did not ignite, which causes the unburnt fuel to combust abnormally on subsequent cycles and destroy things.

Sassi joined Mercedes as a chief engineer. The plan was for him to cover the development of this year's engine while Philip Prew, the other chief engineer, was looking after the current engine at the time.
This season Sassi was meant to oversee the transition of the 2019 engine from the development phase to the racing phase, however he was demoted to head of performance while Owen Jones, the previous head of performance was promoted to chief engineer to replace him.
How much TQ does it make though?

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
414
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:45 am

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:43 pm
Some fresh goss from Merc engineers:

Stroll's failure was a faulty sparkplug causing misfire which eventually took out the cylinder.

Andy Cowell has stated in the post-Canada debrief that Ferrari clearly have more power and Renault have caught up with them. Honda still a bit behind.

Their brand new single cylinder research engine fired up this week. This is the first update since the start of the turbo era.

Lorenzo Sassi who joined from Ferrari as a chief engineer was demoted to head of department.
Source?
===================✯✯
============✯✯
====✯✯
LH44

User avatar
Mudflap
221
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:23 pm
Source?
Night out with some of their folks
How much TQ does it make though?

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
414
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 2:45 am

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:38 pm
PlatinumZealot wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:23 pm
Source?
Night out with some of their folks
I guess people say the truth when they're drunk. Good going.
===================✯✯
============✯✯
====✯✯
LH44

McMika98
McMika98
-38
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2017 9:40 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:43 pm
Some fresh goss from Merc engineers:

Stroll's failure was a faulty sparkplug causing misfire which eventually took out the cylinder.

Andy Cowell has stated in the post-Canada debrief that Ferrari clearly have more power and Renault have caught up with them. Honda still a bit behind.
No suprises here, pretty visible in quali. I think Renault might be up there with Merc if not just ahead.

roon
roon
449
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 6:04 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:38 pm
PlatinumZealot wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:23 pm
Source?
Night out with some of their folks
Ever spoke to them about oil burning? Or was that all press and forum banter? For that matter, steel pistons, multi material pistons, pre-chambers & TJI, fuel composition, speculative stuff generally. Is there anything they get particularly tight-lipped about?

User avatar
Mudflap
221
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Well, as much as I'd like to learn more, I consider it a matter of common sense not try and probe (particularly sensitive subjects) as it can sometimes lead to uncomfortable situations.

Anyway, regarding oil burning I do remember it was mentioned last year that they were discussing with FIA reducing the maximum capacity of the auxiliary oil tank. Apparently all teams agreed except Ferrari who raised a few eyebrows by insisting they needed an unreasonable volume (4 litres or so).
I am not sure if this was reported anywhere in the media.
How much TQ does it make though?

trinidefender
trinidefender
326
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:37 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:43 pm
Some fresh goss from Merc engineers:

Stroll's failure was a faulty sparkplug causing misfire which eventually took out the cylinder.

Andy Cowell has stated in the post-Canada debrief that Ferrari clearly have more power and Renault have caught up with them. Honda still a bit behind.

Their brand new single cylinder research engine fired up this week. This is the first update since the start of the turbo era.

Lorenzo Sassi who joined from Ferrari as a chief engineer was demoted to head of department.
When you say that this is the first update, do you mean that this is the first time that they have changed to a new concept? Surely they have been making incremental improvements to their combustion over the years.

Secondly, other than the issue with Stroll, have they had any other failures or premature changes to PU components this season? Reliability seems to be their strong point and later in the season is probably where teams running the Merc PU will make gains.

User avatar
SiLo
82
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 6:09 pm

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

roon wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:56 pm
Mudflap wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:38 pm
PlatinumZealot wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:23 pm
Source?
Night out with some of their folks
Ever spoke to them about oil burning? Or was that all press and forum banter? For that matter, steel pistons, multi material pistons, pre-chambers & TJI, fuel composition, speculative stuff generally. Is there anything they get particularly tight-lipped about?
They were burning oil. They even had an extra bladder of oil in the tea-tray of the car before it all got cracked down on.
Felipe Baby!

Polite
Polite
18
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 9:36 am

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

Mudflap wrote:
Sun Jun 16, 2019 1:50 am
Well, as much as I'd like to learn more, I consider it a matter of common sense not try and probe (particularly sensitive subjects) as it can sometimes lead to uncomfortable situations.

Anyway, regarding oil burning I do remember it was mentioned last year that they were discussing with FIA reducing the maximum capacity of the auxiliary oil tank. Apparently all teams agreed except Ferrari who raised a few eyebrows by insisting they needed an unreasonable volume (4 litres or so).
I am not sure if this was reported anywhere in the media.
Facts?.. there are no real facts about that. And i think everyone can see, from 2017 (more than 0,9l per gp till the end of the year for Mercs with a new PU before Monza, while Ferrari respected the gentleman agreement of the 0,9 from Monza) to 2019, who was more affected from the new oil regulation.

I think that everyone here can agree that oil burning was a key for qualy boost for Mercs and Ferrari, while Renault was in the first line against it.

am i right?

Polite
Polite
18
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2018 9:36 am

Re: Mercedes Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

SiLo wrote:
Mon Jun 17, 2019 11:11 am
roon wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:56 pm
Mudflap wrote:
Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:38 pm


Night out with some of their folks
Ever spoke to them about oil burning? Or was that all press and forum banter? For that matter, steel pistons, multi material pistons, pre-chambers & TJI, fuel composition, speculative stuff generally. Is there anything they get particularly tight-lipped about?
They were burning oil. They even had an extra bladder of oil in the tea-tray of the car before it all got cracked down on.
that was 2015 to 2016 Ferrari PU.. and no more.