Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
gruntguru
432
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by gruntguru » Thu May 10, 2018 5:38 am

ringo wrote:
Wed May 09, 2018 10:47 pm
This crazy thread still lives? :shock:
Yes, but in a parallel universe of which most folk are unaware.
je suis charlie

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Thu May 10, 2018 10:39 am

gruntguru wrote:
Thu May 10, 2018 5:37 am

Andrew, pumping loss and sliding friction are the only significant sources of mechanical loss in a piston engine. You should provide your calculation of friction losses as suggested by Mudflap - this would fix the communication problem that is preventing any chance of credibility for this thread.
You can count ? then count yourself ..., maybe then most people will believe you ...

Andrew :D

Mudflap
150
User avatar
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 8:36 pm

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Mudflap » Thu May 10, 2018 8:58 pm

So let me understand:

You dismiss published technical papers that have been peer reviewed by highly qualified engineers.
You fail to produce any calculations to support your claim that skirt friction is higher than ring friction even though several members have demonstrated the opposite.
You propose a ridiculous experiment that does not involve piston rings at all arguing that somehow it will prove your point.

How do you think other users rate your credibility ?
How much TQ does it make though?

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Fri May 11, 2018 12:58 am

By the way, such a precise 90 degree angle gear

with Sarrus element ..

Image

Andrew :D

PhillipM
309
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 2:18 pm
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by PhillipM » Fri May 11, 2018 2:22 am

What's the point of that? Larger, heavier, weaker and more friction than a bevel gear.

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Fri May 11, 2018 4:08 am

PhillipM wrote:
Fri May 11, 2018 2:22 am
What's the point of that? ......
To get to know your professional opinion on this subject ... :D

Andrew :D

gruntguru
432
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by gruntguru » Fri May 11, 2018 4:27 am

Unfortunately it doesn't do what a bevel gear will do.
je suis charlie

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Fri May 11, 2018 12:01 pm

gruntguru wrote:
Fri May 11, 2018 4:27 am
Unfortunately it doesn't do what a bevel gear will do.
So sometimes it's hard to understand silly cartoons ...

Image


PLUS
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crankshaft

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Fri May 18, 2018 3:03 am

But I like my cartoons ... here is what the prototype apparently traveled over a million kilometers .. Well, but I would certainly do without 2/3 crankshaft and 4 connecting rods less ...

Image

Image

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commer_TS3

and here, in this photograph, it is perfectly visible that if you replace these connecting rods and the crankshaft for these 3 additional cylinders 9 Next 6 pistons), for which you can clearly see that the place is, and outside put one crank with two connecting rods, then the strong , pratically with the same dimensional parameters and the same could be more likely to have TWO TIMES more power ... If like comon rail to use, then surely and the plane would be suitable with such parameters ..
One idea was enough.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/31486821@ ... 8527/?rb=1

http://www.commer.co.nz/history

Well, if we were to convert the Rootes T4 version, then it would be 400 Hp with a good speed for the propeller.

Here in the movie you can hear that when they "defraud" it's almost like Formula 1 rolleyes
And it would be twice as good ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5xOA53 ... e=youtu.be


Image


A small crankshaft at the front and an additional lever ... I would have put in a good turbocharger yet, but I would leave mechanical roots, too... :love:



Commer Feliks


Image


Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Fri May 18, 2018 4:20 pm

Yes and in this even 8 cylinder engine (8 x 2 piston), only one crank and one "real" connecting rod .. ..

Do you know how many reciprocating masses less?

Image

Andrew :D :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Fri May 18, 2018 11:31 pm

Here is the solution for a normal 4 stroke engine ... it can be 2 x 8 cylinders with heads ... And this roller is common to everyone, it can have diameters ... clutch shaft ... .:)

Image


Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Sun May 20, 2018 10:52 pm

Quote " Kelpiecross, on 19 May 2018 - 06:09, said:

Where is the crankshaft ? "/ Quote

I thought I was following my previous posts. it will be clear ..

ONE crank with ONE connecting rod is at the end of Felix Roller .. Such classic crankshaft no longer needs ...

Of course, the levers are not turning on Feliks Roller anymore, but they are connected with it permanently. The entire Felix Roller is burning and only at the end it drives the one Connecting rod.
Here is a similar rule that I have for the half rotate of the "multi-cylinder"

Image


Andrew :D

gruntguru
432
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by gruntguru » Mon May 21, 2018 4:54 am

Who is Kelpiecross?
je suis charlie

J.A.W.
83
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 4:10 am
Location: Altair IV.

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by J.A.W. » Mon May 21, 2018 7:52 am

Dunno.. mayhaps yet another figment of Felix's wacky ideation.. or even an actual - 'wacky' character?

Image
Dr Zachary Smith sez..
"Yes.. spare us your ridiculous remarks, you insensitive idiot!"

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Mon May 21, 2018 12:22 pm

gruntguru wrote:
Mon May 21, 2018 4:54 am
Who is Kelpiecross?
Apparently Geologist ...

Andrew :D