Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
roon
441
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2016 6:04 pm

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by roon » Sun Jul 22, 2018 5:55 pm

It's also a pity that you have to stick a big honkin crankshaft on the end of your historical reboot device.

You referenced aviation and motorsport applications:
Feliks wrote:
Sun Jul 22, 2018 12:43 am
Only one part of the multi-cylinder H engine can be seen on my animation. As you can see from the history, it can be 24 cylinders .. the order of ignition can also be seen in wikipedia .. If we properly think, the customs of the main cylinder system from Felix Roller, may not have ANY ONE SCREW to twisting .. :wave:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H_engine
Formel 1 too :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Racing_Motors
https://rafaelschelb.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/60s-h16/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycoming_H-2470
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Monarch
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_XH-3130
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Eagle_(1944)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napier_Sabre

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:25 pm

Well, I would not describe it better ... :lol:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UF5j1Dv ... e=youtu.be





Image



Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Wed Aug 22, 2018 1:24 am

Yes, the "Monitor" Memorial Museum is in New York. I am writing that a steam fire pump invented and built by John Ericsson has saved London before burning ...
So inventor John Ericson contributed to the good history of England.
And my engine Feliks -Commer is a bit like that of a hand-operated fire pump ...

http://greenpointmonitormuseum.org/trav ... index2.htm

Image


Image

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:27 am

We'll be back in time a bit, for the first project ...

Here with a sketched diagram in cylinders. the basic standard norm poped by the timing.
You can see a huge difference in capacity volume and its asymmetry ..
Adding well-done gasodynamic phenomena, the volume of one cylinder can even be 700 ccm of really sucked air, with a basic piston of 300 ccm.
Well, it's a little not surprising to receive this 200 hp at 5000 rpm with 1 liter of basic capacity ..

Image

But of course I understand that my experience and knowledge is not needed for anyone ... You can start from the very beginning and ... lose a few years to get what I already know ...

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Thu May 02, 2019 2:43 am

Feliks-Tański engine animation video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoiBCDRjza4


Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Sat May 18, 2019 6:41 pm

Well, here is the way to create a vacuum - different in my Red Baron Windmill ... but now the first Newcomen steam engine called atmospheric, has an inaccurate name .Because actually it is a vacuum-driven engine, which gives condensed water vapor underneath the piston. In my case, this underpressure - it receives differently, from the wings put up in the wind and brought on to entrust the earth through a pipe with a large cross-section. And on the surface of the earth such a motor with pistons driving generators .. It is the most effective way, because virtually thanks to good piston sealing, vacuum we will not lose any losses .. thanks to this the efficiency will be high and no moving element can be seen in principle, except the rotating axis of the generator ... ..
That is why it is worth knowing the history of technology, because it contributes to the creation of new inventions.
here more about this Newcomen engine. , which may be useful to my Windmill Red Baron ... and we will have an efficient motor with a piston seal class, used to produce electricity from the wind ...
Well, it is definitely not a heat engine .. so talking about temperatures is pointless.:smokin: =D>

Image

http://www.technology.niagarac.on.ca/pe ... lXIj_bbyGg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomen_ ... ric_engine


Andrew :D

gruntguru
431
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by gruntguru » Sun May 19, 2019 6:37 am

Feliks wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 6:41 pm
... but now the first Newcomen steam engine called atmospheric, has an inaccurate name. Because actually it is a vacuum-driven engine, which gives condensed water vapor underneath the piston.
There is a reason these were called atmospheric engines.

Firstly, it is not the vacuum which drives the piston - it is the atmospheric pressure - which being greater, drives the piston.

Secondly, most later high-pressure steam engines - certainly marine ones, use a low temperature condenser on the exhaust side of the piston engine. This ensures that the low pressure side of the final stage piston has a vacuum of similar magnitude to the Newcomen engine. Consequently both atmospheric and high-pressure steam engines benefit from a vacuum on the low pressure side of the piston and it would be inaccurate to differentiate the two by calling the Newcomen a "vacuum" engine.
je suis charlie

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Mon May 20, 2019 2:59 am

gruntguru wrote:
Sun May 19, 2019 6:37 am
Feliks wrote:
Sat May 18, 2019 6:41 pm
... but now the first Newcomen steam engine called atmospheric, has an inaccurate name. Because actually it is a vacuum-driven engine, which gives condensed water vapor underneath the piston.
There is a reason these were called atmospheric engines.

Firstly, it is not the vacuum which drives the piston - it is the atmospheric pressure - which being greater, drives the piston.

Secondly, most later high-pressure steam engines - certainly marine ones, use a low temperature condenser on the exhaust side of the piston engine. This ensures that the low pressure side of the final stage piston has a vacuum of similar magnitude to the Newcomen engine. Consequently both atmospheric and high-pressure steam engines benefit from a vacuum on the low pressure side of the piston and it would be inaccurate to differentiate the two by calling the Newcomen a "vacuum" engine.
If the same Newkomen engine will be driven by vacuum, produced by venturi, for example, its name will be more adequate as a vacuum engine ... and then it will not be a heat engine, and all the warm art in this engine are unnecessary ..

it will be a new engine that has never been used for renewable energy. :D

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:56 am

And finally, we have good access to this NASA CALCULATOR for flight profiles. No Java pieces are needed.
Well, you can see that there is a place on the air profile, where the speed of the air is 3 times higher than the speed of the general .. but this is only on a small part of the profile .. But there would be set turbine ..

Image

here a link to this calculator and you can start learning aerodynamics yourself ... before the university is formed in this direction of aerodynamic energy.

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/foil3.html

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:45 am

Here is the thermodynamic problem .. We have in a box, in a vacuum is a set of thermal engines with generators ... Will this set be more efficient than it would be normally installed without a box?
it's about how laws of thermodynamics work on the Equator, and how on the Pole.
Different temperatures
on the Equator 40 degrees Celsius and at the Pole - 40 degrees Celsius also for efficiency and the layout of the engine will be important ...?
Image

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Wed Sep 25, 2019 1:46 am

Unfortunately, the Carnot engine is only a fragment of the reality surrounding us related to heat engines .. But most try to explain it as a generally applicable law. In the meantime, for example, you can do a simple experiment at home with a "cold engine". Just pour cold water into the sink and put a screwed plastic drink bottle into it. We will see how it will change its shape due to the cooling of the air inside by cold water. Based on the change in its appearance, we see that also the engine would be possible on this principle. Everything is relative in physics .. But learning about heat omits many important physical quantities such as evaporation, freezing and most important - time. And theoreticians come to the conclusion that entropy is steadily increasing, but what about the scientific approach cannot be reconciled too much, because what will happen if this entropy is ever going to run out ? ;)
I present here, probably the largest heat engine that a man can build (It is suitable for the Guinness book of records ;) ) And theoretically, the pressure does not play any role in it, because the balloon from below is open .. the air heats up and the balloon can rise even at 5000 meters (record is 20,000 m), then the first balloon empties from warm air and fills the second, which thanks to the scrolling line to their tether will do electricity in the generator. Then the cycle repeats, from what we release at the top warm air and the bottom one, we fill it ... The old good principle and pressure does not play any role .. It's just a curiosity that not everything with heat is a Carnot engine ..
By the way, a hot air balloon is the longest-lasting machine in the air so far - the record is over 10 days ...
This shows because maybe there are other heat engines with higher efficiency than currently known .. Anyway. there is already a contribution to new thinking ...

Image

Andrew :D :D

gruntguru
431
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 6:43 am

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by gruntguru » Thu Sep 26, 2019 1:11 am

The Carnot engine is a theoretical engine which operates converts heat energy to mechanical work in a cycle which has four events. The Carnot engine is able to convert the maximum possible heat into work. Every other engine is not a Carnot engine but it is useful to compare any engine to the Carnot engine to see how close its efficiency approaches the Carnot efficiency (which is the maximum possible efficiency). The Carnot engine and the "Carnot efficiency" formula both take into account the "cold side" temperature so the efficiency of "cold engines" can also be calculated. Incidentally the Carnot engine and its reverse - the Carnot heat pump - do not increase the entropy of the working fluid.

It would be interesting to calculate the efficiency of the tethered balloon engine. I suspect it would be quite good (provided the balloon was well insulated so the burner did not have to operate once it left the ground.

It would not be possible to fill the lower balloon using hot air from the upper. The pumping energy required to force the lighter hot air back down is equal to the energy gained while the hot air was rising.
je suis charlie

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:54 pm

Thanks .

This comparison is actually interesting. but theoretically it is quite a challenge to calculate it .. it is a buoyancy engine, and such an engine in water that has neutral buoyancy can travel many kilometers horizontally, with minimal energy (3 seconds of electric motor operation to change the buoyancy of the vehicle) First the vehicle sinks to the depth 4 km, then the engine changes its buoyancy and the vehicle emerges on the surface. And it has wings with an inclination of 45 degrees, which also covers the road horizontally ... and also stays horizontally also 8 km .. Then the engine starts again and the vehicle sinks another 4 km ...

Yes, my balloons would need a radiator like SABRE, but it would be needed the other way around, i.e. for quick air heating. It would fill balloons on the ground, from a low-temperature heat source, preferably from geothermal energy with a water temperature of only 70 degrees Celsius. And of course, we would receive electric current in an uncomplicated and efficient way. And this is my way of getting electricity from geothermal energy ...

Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Thu Oct 03, 2019 8:56 pm

So here in slow motion you can see how the valve works in a four-stroke internal combustion engine .. You can see perfectly the "precision" of this mechanism .. It is best to watch it on the maximum screen .. You can see how the valve is when not pressed (and then there is a stroke of work with high pressure ) we are simply shaken by the effect of spring vibrations bouncing off the valve face and inertia .. At the bottom of this valve there is a "mushroom" which closes the way to the cylinder .. But since the valve stem dances so, the mushroom also makes such movements .. A since it performs these movements, even when it is "theoretically" closed, it really does not close the cylinder tightly, despite the fact that it is subject to a stroke pressure of up to 100 atmospheres. And we can imagine how much of this pressure escapes from the cylinder, on the effect of these "supposed" small, but very spoiling cylinder tightness, the movements of this mushroom .. Because at a pressure of 100 atmospheres, we can imagine that even a small gap, however, can even drop to 30 atmospheres make .. this mechanism is economical, and produced in virtually all internal combustion engines .. And complacency that the valve will be tight, because it presses it to the seat, high pressure in the cylinder is only the "wishful thinking" of the designers of such a system. because you can see that this is not true, because the valve sways and bounces off the socket, just when it should be closed ... This film helped me understand why my engine without these valves has such high efficiency and power, because how it receives in the cylinder, these 100 atmospheres, I will never lose my tightness all the time, closing the "valve", maybe like 2 atmospheres .. Well, but the amount of energy to use will be 3 times greater than in a traditional engine ... because 98 atmospheres .. And so on every cylinder .. adding to this even 40% more displacement, and twice as high achievable maximum revolutions, it also receives incredible power ten times greater than the original factory engine ... the load. Well, to find out about all this, I had to do [for 3 years of hard work a prototype of this engine, and say that it is so, although at first it did not seem to me at all, that so much is possible .. But it is thanks theoretically, to drive a Toddler (Fiat 126), with the same power as the original, you need a motor that will be smaller these ... 10 times .. But all this can not be determined by just watching the animations of my engine and criticizing me .. You need to spend your private million dollars to find out that this is the case ... And this film also shows that it is possible with all the imperfections of the current valve system ...
Even an indicator pressure test on an oscilloscope shows us that the pressure drops, but does not show us WHERE it escapes ... :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adYrRk22GDQ


Andrew :D

Feliks
5
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Krakow,Poland

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas

Post by Feliks » Sun Oct 06, 2019 5:05 am

In this film, you can imagine that on the other side of the valves there is the same disc as at the top and of course the wedges when it is to be closed, does the same at the bottom as this disc at the top of the springs

https://youtu.be/uUYn5kFFb5s

https://youtu.be/WtqDHJDN79w

https://youtu.be/_REQ1PUM0rY

https://youtu.be/pFTQrxQ3C3E

Andrew :D