Bloodhound SSC

Please discuss here all your remarks and pose your questions about all racing series, except Formula One. Both technical and other questions about GP2, Touring cars, IRL, LMS, ...
olefud
79
Joined: 13 Mar 2011, 00:10
Location: Boulder, Colorado USA

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:It went supersonic. Bang bang.
Good point! If it boomed it must have gove supersonic.

I think there were three new design principles were need to transition to effective supersonic flight;

1 As discussed the wing needed a design that minimized migration of the center of pressure. The original P-38 was a bad actor in this regard as it was designed with a thick “interceptor” wing that went trans sonic at as slow as 460 kts. After killing I think three test pilots it was released to combat without a fix. Ultimately a “dive brake” that stabilized the CoP, and ultimately a new wing, fixed the problem.

2 The stabilator which has been discussed in its various iterations. and

3 The Area Rule Law which requires that the entire longitudinal x-section of a plane –including the wings- be near constant. The fix is manifested as the coke-bottle shaped fuselage. This requirement is easier to meet in a car.

User avatar
dobbster71
4
Joined: 28 Jan 2014, 16:55

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

WRC is for boys. Group B was for men!
Juha Kankkunen

roon
412
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 19:04

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

Will there be a way, or need, to test the rocket in-motion? I assume they can do stationary burns. Or will Andy Green be pressing the big red button marked "ROCKET" on the day-of, and hope for the best?

J.A.W.
109
Joined: 01 Sep 2014, 05:10
Location: Altair IV.

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

olefud wrote:
17 Oct 2012, 18:10
Just_a_fan wrote:It went supersonic. Bang bang.
Good point! If it boomed it must have gone supersonic...

1 As discussed the wing needed a design that minimized migration of the center of pressure. The original P-38 was a bad actor in this regard as it was designed with a thick “interceptor” wing that went trans sonic at as slow as 460 kts. After killing I think three test pilots it was released to combat without a fix. Ultimately a “dive brake” that stabilized the CoP, and ultimately a new wing, fixed the problem...
Actually, the production/service P-38 never got that new wing, & was dive speed limited to ~440 mph IAS,
even after the 'dive flaps' enabled control to be regained..

This low combat Mach capability of ~0.65 really hindered the P-38 - in the ETO against the Luftwaffe 109/190's,
& was a major reason why the USAAF 'glamour' outfit, the 8th AF - replaced them - with new P-51 Mustangs..
"Well, we knocked the bastard off!"

Ed Hilary on being 1st to top Mt Everest,
(& 1st to do a surface traverse across Antarctica,
in good Kiwi style - riding a Massey Ferguson farm
tractor - with a few extemporised mod's to hack the task).

Tommy Cookers
620
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

over 50 years ago British pilot and motor racer 'Dizzy' Addicott apparently acquired a Swift jet fighter to convert for the LSR
unusually and handily for this, the Swift iirc had an afterburner

iirc he pioneered (outside the USA anyway) the use of the production all-aluminium Buick V8 in race cars intended for 4 cyl engines
http://www.manikllc.com/library/Lotus_1 ... 010-05.pdf
this GM (pushrod) engine design of course (when abandoned by Buick and purchased by Rover) was made and developed for another 30 years eg WTC
and Oldsmobile blocks (Buick-brother, more head studs) used with Irving-designed sohc heads etc by Brabham's team, won WDC and WCC in 1966/67
of course the pushrod Oldsmobile engine was used to some effect in early Can-Am by the McLaren car

and
http://www.minimarcos.org.uk/mmhda.html
http://www.pprune.org/aviation-history- ... t-rip.html
http://www.pprune.org/aviation-history- ... ded-2.html
... but no proper records of Addicott's Swift LSR concept ?

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

I just watched this video on LSR racing. It mostly focuses on the British teams but it really gives you a feel for how batshit crazy the early racers were.


User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

lkelm15 wrote:
13 Apr 2010, 02:05
From my understanding Bonneville was not chosen for the record attempt because of the hardness of the ground and the havoc it could potentially wreak on the bottom of the vehicle by bouncing shock waves back up to it.
late quote on this but Bonneville is no where near long enough. Best course we have had in years has been 12 miles this is probably ok for 500 mph maybe a little more but no where near 1000mph. What will really be interesting is how much time they will burn slowing down and still get the car back through the timed mile in under an hour.

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

good point, plus could the thin salt support it?
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

User avatar
flynfrog
Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2006, 22:31

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

strad wrote:
30 Oct 2017, 23:26
good point, plus could the thin salt support it?
probably not in its current state. Its been hit or miss the last few years.

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: Bloodhound SSC

Post

Back in 80 I had the chance to take my C/ED to the salt.
However the people around me at the time talked me out of it.
I thought it would be good fun. I now wish I'd done it.
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss