ADUO Figures Revealed
Honda is so far behind it landed in the newly added 6-8% range, unlocking more budget and development time
https://x.com/FDataAnalysis/status/2063 ... _&ref_url=
People are calling it a "B-spec" but we don't know if it is a true B-spec. Newey said they just decided to take their time cause the current chassis was rushed for Australia and release all the updates as one. To be honest, I don't even know how heavily modified the front or rear suspension needs to be to qualify as a b-spec.Bill wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 18:38the reason aston need spec b is because his aggressive approach with honda pu layout has backfired so do his suspension layout
i think a true b-spec means a different chassis. if they have to change to mate better to hondas PU thats one thing, but whether the car will start with a different development path is debatable. i dont think we have enough info to know whether the suspension is needing to be changed. the PU, mguk induced engine braking problems and gearbox clouds everything really. its like trying to solve a rubics cube with your eyes closed from where were sitting.diffuser wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 05:37People are calling it a "B-spec" but we don't know if it is a true B-spec. Newey said they just decided to take their time cause the current chassis was rushed for Australia and release all the updates as one. To be honest, I don't even know how heavily modified the front or rear suspension needs to be to qualify as a b-spec.
thats great, so the team has fooled all the judges into thinking the power unit is bad enough to recieve the highest ADUO level (and actually create a new higher level of assistance just for them) just by turning the engine down. i never realized how clueless the FIA were.Rasoose wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 23:46Considering the gearbox issues Alonso and team members have been talking about all weekend, it should be no surprise they'd be running conservative in the FP sessions. Not to mention their PU parts pool concerns. Constant issues with gear sync, overall lack of grip, and running very marginal on cooling would also help explain these differences.
It's a real difference and we appreciate you sharing the telemetry, but the context is important as always.
it's a fake tweet there a no numbers released by anyone yetAhmerBaig wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 04:38ADUO Figures Revealed
Honda is so far behind it landed in the newly added 6-8% range, unlocking more budget and development time
https://x.com/FDataAnalysis/status/2063 ... _&ref_url=
The exact numbers aren't official, but even Sky has seen the documents:Venturiation wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 12:56it's a fake tweet there a no numbers released by anyone yetAhmerBaig wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 04:38ADUO Figures Revealed
Honda is so far behind it landed in the newly added 6-8% range, unlocking more budget and development time
https://x.com/FDataAnalysis/status/2063 ... _&ref_url=
The Honda being 6-8% off comes from Autoracer's sources.Sky Sports News has seen the document which states Mercedes are more than two per cent behind Red Bull's power unit, so will be given one engine upgrade this year, while Ferrari, Audi and Honda will be given two upgrades as they are deemed to be more than four per cent adrift of Red Bull.
Doesn't take a genius to start with a base HP number then calculate 6% then 8% off of that and come up with a range that will be fairly accurate.
Yeah, they just used 600 and percentages of that in the tweet. If you guesstimate the RB at 570 instead, 6 and 8% would be 34.2 and 45.6.
I think some of the issues they're talking about as gearbox problems are actually Honda drivability issues. The accident Stroll had yesterday, where he kept getting drive while on the brakes—a problem Alonso has also talked about—is likely a software glitch.FNTC wrote: ↑08 Jun 2026, 19:32Yeah, they just used 600 and percentages of that in the tweet. If you guesstimate the RB at 570 instead, 6 and 8% would be 34.2 and 45.6.
I don't know if we will get any actual numbers, or if we get to know if Honda is in the 6-8% bracket or not, but if the sources are correct, it should be somewhere between 30 and 50hp off the RB ICE engine.
Sounds like they have a B spec in the works.GoranF1 wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 21:27Adrian says after Melbourne a decision was made to not do small updates at all, instead they decided to take their time to put systems in place,do the research much more carefully because car was rushed for Australia, take the shortterm pain and than make bigger steps whit update.
It's expected before summer break,so in Belgium.
And the FIA speed measurement method is garbage..