Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Post Reply
User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

I see the front of the cape has a nice little appendage now!
197 104 103 7

Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

The cape's droopy front end was run in testing so it's not a "new" development.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.


User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

This looks different than what we saw in testing.

Image
197 104 103 7

User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

W09's exhaust layout without the cover
Image
Image

Rear suspension detail
Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

User avatar
ringo
227
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Image

I think there is more to this link.
Is there a rod connected normal to it and this rod going inside some kind of hydraulic unit behind?

Or is this link here just to ensure that both left and right components move with the same rate? One can never compress or extend at a different rate with that link between the both of them.
What this does in a roll situation is put the relative movement resulting from the forces on each side of the suspension into the tyre carcass and not into the suspension components. The tyre will take more compliance than usual with this arrangement.
In heave the cranks move at the same rate, and there is no considerable force transmitted through that center link. Hence the tyres will not be worked as previously stated.
What says the suspension experts about this speculation?
For Sure!!

skwdenyer
13
Joined: 17 May 2010, 00:00

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

PhillipM wrote:
22 Mar 2018, 22:36
Massive heave springing and very little in roll looking at that.
The single wheel springing is by torsion bars. This arrangement will ensure that rolling onto the outer wheel will cause the inner wheel to be "picked up" thus reducing ride height during long corners.

That's quite smart. One has to assume that the shiny heave element is an inerter.

User avatar
DVB
11
Joined: 21 Aug 2015, 22:52

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Does someone has an idea what is coming out of the rear wing support? This showed during the crash of Bottas...

Image
Everybody is a Ferrari fan.

User avatar
oetger
14
Joined: 24 Dec 2013, 10:17
Location: NL

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Image

ivanlesk
2
Joined: 17 Nov 2017, 21:09

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Hidraulic fluid?

User avatar
Bomber_Pilot
20
Joined: 28 Jan 2011, 14:19

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Hydraulic fluid for the drs.

djones
20
Joined: 17 Mar 2005, 15:01

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Is the car good over bumps simply because they run it quite soft?

PhillipM
385
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

skwdenyer wrote:
24 Mar 2018, 06:06

The single wheel springing is by torsion bars. This arrangement will ensure that rolling onto the outer wheel will cause the inner wheel to be "picked up" thus reducing ride height during long corners.
It's the exact opposite, this is softening the suspension in roll and single wheel bump compared to heave.

rileykirn
2
Joined: 17 Jan 2017, 15:12

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

Bomber_Pilot wrote:
24 Mar 2018, 09:18
Hydraulic fluid for the drs.
I watched it over & over & it seemed more like smoke/steam.

User avatar
Sieper
73
Joined: 14 Mar 2017, 15:19

Re: Mercedes AMG F1 W09 EQ Power+

Post

rileykirn wrote:
24 Mar 2018, 19:53
Bomber_Pilot wrote:
24 Mar 2018, 09:18
Hydraulic fluid for the drs.
I watched it over & over & it seemed more like smoke/steam.
Wasn’t it just smoke from the turbo waste gate, the engine was still running. the lefthand waste gate tube got bent upwarts in the crash.

Post Reply