Mercedes W11

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Morteza
2308
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 18:23
Location: Bushehr, Iran

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

Austria upgrades (via F1i.com)
Image

Image

Image
"A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool."~William Shakespeare

wesley123
204
Joined: 23 Feb 2008, 17:55

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

'electrical noise' doesn't really sound like a big issue imo. Insulation of cables would be a relatively easy fix is my guess.
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

zibby43
613
Joined: 04 Mar 2017, 12:16

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

atanatizante wrote:
07 Jul 2020, 14:30
Mercedes admits W11 design has fundamental gearbox issue!

They think that repeat gearbox problem on its W11 would be inevitable with its current car configuration, after revealing that a build-up of electrical noise is triggering its issues: https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... e/4827558/
It's actually the ancillary components inside the car, which in turn affect the gearbox sensors, rather than the gearbox itself. Which is critical, as those other ancillary components can be replaced with fresh, newly designed/manufactured components without running afoul of the "5 consecutive races for a gearbox" rule.

"Shovlin explained that the cause of the problems is related to a build-up of electrical interference within the car systems, which ultimately begin to impact on the gearbox and its sensors."

While changes may require modifications to the gearbox, it is understood it will not require a totally new gearbox design.

zibby43
613
Joined: 04 Mar 2017, 12:16

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

Update on the gearbox sensor issue:


User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

zibby43 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:25
Update on the gearbox sensor issue:

https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 31011?s=20
Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.
197 104 103 7

zibby43
613
Joined: 04 Mar 2017, 12:16

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

dans79 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:40
zibby43 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:25
Update on the gearbox sensor issue:

https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 31011?s=20
Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.
Interesting. I wondered what what would be the most efficient way of addressing it. Thanks for sharing a little more insight.

User avatar
dans79
267
Joined: 03 Mar 2013, 19:33
Location: USA

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

zibby43 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 17:58
dans79 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:40
zibby43 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:25
Update on the gearbox sensor issue:

https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 31011?s=20
Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.
Interesting. I wondered what what would be the most efficient way of addressing it. Thanks for sharing a little more insight.
It depends what they mean by noise exactly. I assume they mean em noise giving erroneous signals. If that's the case the best fix would be shielding the components and wiring, but that isn't something they are going to be able to turn around in under a week without access to home base. Thus, I assume they are going to use software to try and filter out the bad signals and work around the issue.
197 104 103 7

LM10
120
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

dans79 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 19:28
zibby43 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 17:58
dans79 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:40


Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.
Interesting. I wondered what what would be the most efficient way of addressing it. Thanks for sharing a little more insight.
It depends what they mean by noise exactly. I assume they mean em noise giving erroneous signals. If that's the case the best fix would be shielding the components and wiring, but that isn't something they are going to be able to turn around in under a week without access to home base. Thus, I assume they are going to use software to try and filter out the bad signals and work around the issue.
I think a simple fix via software (filtering) would have been done over the weekend as well. They knew that problem on Friday already. So the real fix of the issue might actually take longer and the countermeasurements Fabrega is talking about might be no fixing, but reducing the issue.

zibby43
613
Joined: 04 Mar 2017, 12:16

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

dans79 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 19:28
zibby43 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 17:58
dans79 wrote:
08 Jul 2020, 16:40


Good to hear, I assumed this was going to be a simple fix that added a filter to the sensor/control loop.
Interesting. I wondered what what would be the most efficient way of addressing it. Thanks for sharing a little more insight.
It depends what they mean by noise exactly. I assume they mean em noise giving erroneous signals. If that's the case the best fix would be shielding the components and wiring, but that isn't something they are going to be able to turn around in under a week without access to home base. Thus, I assume they are going to use software to try and filter out the bad signals and work around the issue.
Appreciate the insight. One of the reasons I love this forum.

As @LM10 mentions above, does software play a role at all?

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

He said the "model" had a know problem. Sounds like some sort of hardware problem.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

ncx
ncx
19
Joined: 20 Jul 2019, 13:11

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

After winter testing, iirc, the general take on the DAS was that it allows to zero the toe on the straight while putting it back in the corner, hence giving much more scope for toe optimisation, including larger toe in corners without comprising the straight, tyre wear reduction and possibly aero advantages. The currently most common story is instead that it is used to increase toe on the straight to warm the tyres. Of course it may well be that they use it differently on different tracks, although not during the race as apparently there are only two settings available to the drivers. Is there any direct conclusive evidence on how it was used in Austria, say, from onboard camera footage in which the change in toe is visible?

User avatar
SiLo
130
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

I think there is some camera footage of it being used, likely some on boards.
Felipe Baby!

User avatar
Holm86
244
Joined: 10 Feb 2010, 03:37
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

ncx wrote:
09 Jul 2020, 13:28
After winter testing, iirc, the general take on the DAS was that it allows to zero the toe on the straight while putting it back in the corner, hence giving much more scope for toe optimisation, including larger toe in corners without comprising the straight, tyre wear reduction and possibly aero advantages. The currently most common story is instead that it is used to increase toe on the straight to warm the tyres. Of course it may well be that they use it differently on different tracks, although not during the race as apparently there are only two settings available to the drivers. Is there any direct conclusive evidence on how it was used in Austria, say, from onboard camera footage in which the change in toe is visible?
I just had a wheel alignment done on my car, as it went through a couple of new front tires in 5 months.
After the alignment the gasmilage even went up by 10%.

I think DAS enables Mercedes to use a bit more aggresive toe out, and uses DAS to control tire wear/temperatures and fuel efficiency. The more aggresive toe, can be used to get more heat into the tires during safety car.
But ofc it will be different from track to track. But there are a lot of minor issues DAS can solve. The geometry setup can be less compromized ...

bosyber
45
Joined: 15 Sep 2015, 22:41

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

Holm86 wrote:
09 Jul 2020, 13:50
ncx wrote:
09 Jul 2020, 13:28
After winter testing, iirc, the general take on the DAS was that it allows to zero the toe on the straight while putting it back in the corner, hence giving much more scope for toe optimisation, including larger toe in corners without comprising the straight, tyre wear reduction and possibly aero advantages. The currently most common story is instead that it is used to increase toe on the straight to warm the tyres. Of course it may well be that they use it differently on different tracks, although not during the race as apparently there are only two settings available to the drivers. Is there any direct conclusive evidence on how it was used in Austria, say, from onboard camera footage in which the change in toe is visible?
I just had a wheel alignment done on my car, as it went through a couple of new front tires in 5 months.
After the alignment the gasmilage even went up by 10%.

I think DAS enables Mercedes to use a bit more aggresive toe out, and uses DAS to control tire wear/temperatures and fuel efficiency. The more aggresive toe, can be used to get more heat into the tires during safety car.
But ofc it will be different from track to track. But there are a lot of minor issues DAS can solve. The geometry setup can be less compromized ...
Seems likely. Also, I recall a radio transmission to Bottas that he'd have to go further on the DAS setting to get the tyres warmed during the 1st SC of last Sunday's race, so I doubt there is just a binary setting for it, though there maybe notches and a limited amount of pre-sets per weekend.

zibby43
613
Joined: 04 Mar 2017, 12:16

Re: Mercedes W11

Post

Any thoughts on why the Merc’s looked relatively underwhelming compared to last week? Particularly with HAM’s car?

No one at Merc seemed that concerned about the performance, other than saying there were stumped by HAM’s car’s performance in certain corner types.

HAM was in a light mood, though, talking about a “dry dance” for tomorrow.

Post Reply