Page 11 of 53
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 21 Sep 2010, 01:09
by Feliks
To those dixielnds can efficiently drive Hydraulic, it may have, no peaks of specialized software, use the links below.
http://www.hippocampus.org/homework-hel ... ation.html
http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/kinnas/31 ... nturi.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... 66/le2.htm
The lower pressure propeller spins quickly ....
And review of the fact that it's not worth double the turbine insert...
Mistake..!!
Andrew
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 27 Sep 2010, 11:26
by Feliks
A new way of sailing through a balloon which has the wind, and transmits energy to the propeller using hydraulics
And sailing version of the Venturi jets:
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 04 Oct 2010, 00:07
by Feliks
I simply will look as flat block. It can be cast as a single unit. It did not need the division on the block and head. Because the pistons can be put at the bottom......
It is full 4 stroke engine.
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 14 Oct 2010, 16:19
by Feliks
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/08/ddwfttw/all/1
My version of car wind.Solo of trumpet
Will test whether it could be faster than the wind... Boat too....
ICE BOAT
Regards Andrew:
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 12:44
by Feliks
But perhaps the experience of the Ice Race can to help you change the aerodynamics in F1?
But in F1, there are winds above 300 km / h !
Fighter aircraft F-104 starts at a similar velocity. Right then, about 700 KG per 1 square meter load.
If using a well-sculpted are did the 700 KG used to accelerate boild F1 ......
I think that not everything has been said in the aerodynamics of F1.....
700 KG at 1 m^2 - 70 KG forward at 10 dcm^2 aditional F1 wings....
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 15 Oct 2010, 15:52
by Feliks
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 02:32
by Feliks
Can it save fuel by using the wings ??
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 17 Oct 2010, 16:30
by Feliks
Feliks wrote:Can it save fuel by using the wings ??
Regards Andrew
It all depends on how clever way it uses the wing...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_boat
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_fa ... n_the_wind
Or, the cyclist can get speed of 200 km / h?
And they like to ride in the peloton?
http://www.physics.unsw.edu.au/~jw/sailing.html
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 24 Oct 2010, 02:26
by Feliks
Feliks wrote:autogyro wrote:
Hi Andrew
Congratulations on achieving such a great result.
Yes this engine will work fine and has some interesting potential IMO.
However, using the overhead crankshaft is actualy the first step in developing the 'sleeve valve' engines used in the last of the piston engined performance aircraft of the 1940s and early 50s.
Replace the two pistons with a moveable cylinder liner and move it up and down and side to side to uncover intake and exhaust ports with a small crank driven off the main crank in the lower crank case.
The culmination of this technology was achieved by Rolls Royce with the RR Crecy engine of 26 liters and a potential of nearly 5000bhp.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Crecy
Thanks, but why give links to the two-stroke engine Crecy?
In Krakow , in the Museum of Aviations (about 300 aviation engines) there is even such Hercules :
This is the fastest piston engine in the entire museum.
There is a cross-section of the engine and the Junkers (Diesel)
I have after doing these two prototypes of such experience in the construction of my engine, with the declared 3000 cm ^ 3 F1 probably say I'd do a good engine 1300 HP, speed 10 000 RPM, and it would be a diesel !
The efficiency of this engine with a Swiss physicists, Mr Daniell Hubner shots nicely to this new physical efficiency:
This is the first to improve the physical efficiency of internal combustion engine depending on the innertia.Because the efficiency of the engine is not only the P-V diagram
And I think that this is such a natural right to be, regardless of whether someone has included a variety of reasons, my engine in the Rules or not.
Regards Andrew
It should be approached with great reverence for history...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6Zw1_NiSWg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJcxpFTFJPA&NR=1
At this film see why Crecy was in the half of the road. Simply moving the heat from the cylinder is very difficult way to get to the fins ...
But my engine, as befits the end of the road ,a little better light, even though this is only the second prototype.
Regards Andrew:D
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 25 Oct 2010, 03:32
by Feliks
This problem ereting towers
can be resolved with Jazz Big Band. Just half of the turbine rotates in one direction and half in another page.
I did this study in the Venturi nozzle turbine and the calculations have a rather surprising results. Back to front.
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 25 Oct 2010, 11:49
by mx_tifoso
Have you tested it yet? Results?
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 26 Oct 2010, 17:25
by autogyro
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rolls-Royce_Crecy
The Crecy was water cooled and used a different and far more effective sleeve valve than the Bristol Herculese. Cooling was not a problem.
It was also a two stroke and supercharged. 5000 horsepower
We have two much larger Bristol sleeve valve engines from a Beverly four engined transport. They sit in one of the hangers. I might get one out on a trailer and run it up soon. 3800 horsepower. Should be fun. About three times the power of a poppet valved radial of the same capacity.
Re: Intake Valve
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 01:23
by Feliks
mx_tifosi wrote:
Have you tested it yet? Results?
Unfortunately, I do not have anything yet. FOR a new idea
But I think, it very delicate matter. Certainly will be different for each car model, position, and of course, the angles and the airfoil.
It would be best to do so much importance possibly in XY motion. Then fix it on the wing and the whole of the test car, now you really should do some test rides, say a speed of 100 km / h, and see on this scale, when we get something going forward ...
The second option is to put a professional is all to the tunnel aero.
Crecy timing was driven by connecting rods
Regards Andrew
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 27 Oct 2010, 20:42
by autogyro
Crecy sleeve valves moved 30 percent of piston stroke.
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 28 Oct 2010, 00:06
by Feliks
autogyro wrote:Crecy sleeve valves moved 30 percent of piston stroke.
thanks, I did not know. Mine has a 70 mm stroke and the chief, and 60 mm stroke valve
Andrew