Page 15 of 84

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:25
by xpensive
The true measure of an engine is its power and nothing else, that's why god invented gearboxes and final drives!

Btw, a goldstar to the member who can tell what this is? In all honesty, I don't have a clue myself, but it looks cool.

Image

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:32
by Richard
Especially for foxhound, this is where it all began.

Engineers will appreciate the 75% thermal efficiency.

Other forums are available for vroom-vroom fanboys

Image

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:36
by Richard
xpensive wrote:The true measure of an engine is its power and nothing else, that's why god invented gearboxes and final drives!

Btw, a goldstar to the member who can tell what this is? In all honesty, I don't have a clue myself, but it looks cool.
Twin Turbocharged LT5 powered Buick? http://www.supercars.net/Pics?viewPic=y ... first=true

.. in a 1967 Chevelle http://www.miataturbo.net/insert-bs-her ... post771793

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:36
by djos
xpensive wrote:The true measure of an engine is its power and nothing else, that's why god invented gearboxes and final drives!

Btw, a goldstar to the member who can tell what this is? In all honesty, I don't have a clue myself, but it looks cool.

Image
Looks like a highly customized Chev small block v8 to me, hard to be certain tho - massively impressive plumbing work etc :)

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:43
by wesley123
Isn't that from one of those corvette tuners? Forgot the name though

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:47
by xpensive
The goldstar goes to our distinguished moderator.

Btw, I'm not sure the majority of the members got this one, but I think I did; Love for Maldonado perhaps?
richard_leeds wrote: ...
Revphillia

... love for the clergy?

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 26 Nov 2013, 23:50
by Richard
xpensive wrote:Love for Maldonado perhaps?
You got it.

He also worked out how to make milk safe.

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 00:08
by xpensive
richard_leeds wrote:
xpensive wrote:Love for Maldonado perhaps?
You got it.
...
I would have gone for Alain Prost any day of the week myself.

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 00:28
by Sombrero

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 03:14
by wuzak
richard_leeds wrote:Especially for foxhound, this is where it all began.

Engineers will appreciate the 75% thermal efficiency.

Other forums are available for vroom-vroom fanboys

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Engine.jpg
No engine in the world gets 75% thermal efficiency.

The huge boat Diesels get maybe 50%.

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 05:00
by flynfrog
richard_leeds wrote:
xpensive wrote:The true measure of an engine is its power and nothing else, that's why god invented gearboxes and final drives!

Btw, a goldstar to the member who can tell what this is? In all honesty, I don't have a clue myself, but it looks cool.
Twin Turbocharged LT5 powered Buick? http://www.supercars.net/Pics?viewPic=y ... first=true

.. in a 1967 Chevelle http://www.miataturbo.net/insert-bs-her ... post771793

the LT5 was a corvette motor not buick. GMs rare dance with overhead cams.
Image

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 05:16
by flynfrog
xpensive wrote:
flynfrog wrote: ...
how about you take your argument elsewhere and post more pictures of pretty shiny things.
...
Pretty shining things Flyn, this one is from down under!

http://memimage.cardomain.com/ride_imag ... ?15308-013
oooh shiny

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 05:27
by FW17
A beast (Just don’t stare at it too long)

Image

Image

Image

Image

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 10:45
by Tommy Cookers
wuzak wrote:
richard_leeds wrote:Especially for foxhound, this is where it all began.
Engineers will appreciate the 75% thermal efficiency.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Engine.jpg
No engine in the world gets 75% thermal efficiency.
The huge boat Diesels get maybe 50%.
the reason for this discrepancy ? ..........
thermal efficiency applies to events in-cylinder
overall efficiency unfortunately aka brake thermal efficiency applies to events from air intake to flywheel

Re: A shameless thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 27 Nov 2013, 11:06
by xpensive
I believe the good moderator was referring to a steam engine and not an ICE, which probably can reach a 75% efficiency?