Page 15 of 69
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 01:20
by vall
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Val my post was appropriate to the thread!!!!
smikle, you probably assume the only thing that can get hamilton, is a robot made of kryptonite driving a Red Bull RB6 with machine guns that will laser opponents within 5 meters of its diffuser!
Good luck to you if thats the way you feel, all I know is when Hamilton falls from the pedestal you built him up on...you not gonna be a happy bunny.
yes, but the place of the response to it is clearly in this one
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 12:11
by vall
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Good luck to you if thats the way you feel, all I know is when Hamilton falls from the pedestal you built him up on...you not gonna be a happy bunny.
for example by doing what Shummy did in 1994 and 1997
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 12:14
by andrew
vall wrote:JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Good luck to you if thats the way you feel, all I know is when Hamilton falls from the pedestal you built him up on...you not gonna be a happy bunny.
for example by doing what Shummy did in 1994 and 1997
What was wrong with 94?
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 12:15
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
Not this again!!!
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 12:18
by andrew
It's ok, vall is just missing their usual sparring partner.
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 12:31
by vall
andrew wrote:vall wrote:for example by doing what Shummy did in 1994 and 1997
What was wrong with 94?
there are of course different views on this, but I think in both 94 and 97 he tried the same dirty trick. in 94 in worked, but not in 97.
I don't want to start a discussion about these old stories, I was just diving an example
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 14:19
by andrew
The 2 incidents are completely different. In 94 Schumacher took the racing line and Hill made a desperate lunge, a fact that Hill has since admitted during the pre-race coverage and 97 was just a greatly vilified racing incident where both were desperate to win.
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 14:44
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Not this again!!!
Deary me,
NOT THIS AGAIN!
Schumi was to blame for both incidents...
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 14:45
by andrew
Are you trying to tell us something?
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 14:47
by vall
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Not this again!!!
Deary me,
NOT THIS AGAIN!
As I said, I am not responding to him....
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 14:50
by andrew
vall wrote:JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Not this again!!!
Deary me,
NOT THIS AGAIN!
As I said, I am not responding to him....
=D>
Re: The "Fanboy Ying Yang" thread
Posted: 20 Jul 2010, 20:30
by Mysticf1
hahahah im sure some posters are aware of Godwin's law of forum debates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
i think there should be a law specific to F1 forums where debates get to the point where schumi's bad moves come into it
Re: German GP 2010 - Hockenheimring
Posted: 24 Jul 2010, 04:36
by Super racing
May the best driver(Hamilton) win
6 car pile up at the start... all zee germans! would be hilarilous
Re: Abu Dhabi GP 2010 - Yas Marina Circuit
Posted: 08 Nov 2010, 23:57
by marcush.
my point is Hamilton was right on the pace in abu dhabi with a crap car that is a bit more than immaterial at least to me...
btw please be so kind and explain what is not true in my statement ?
Re: Abu Dhabi GP 2010 - Yas Marina Circuit
Posted: 09 Nov 2010, 00:07
by Arunas
marcush. wrote:my point is Hamilton was right on the pace in abu dhabi with a crap car that is a bit more than immaterial at least to me...
btw please be so kind and explain what is not true in my statement ?
Was he? (on the pace) Or may be his car had KERS on the board, very useful device on such track IMHO?