Page 16 of 53
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 19 Jul 2011, 11:20
by Feliks
Instead, we can build an automatic flow of balls so that they can be sucked into the pipe.
A falling ball (or WATER) with wings, they can hit their way back after a shoulder wheel, similar to a water wheel, giving him his potential energy ..
Well, the automatic circuit, will cause the "Hercules" he can rest.
This is just an example of how we can use another way of generating energy this way.
"The Water Wind Power Plant"
Love for "tuning" not gone...
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 21 Jul 2011, 00:50
by Feliks
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 22 Jul 2011, 12:24
by Feliks
I actually wasted 2 min typing that text in google translator and came up with this:
"scientists believe the surface of his wings is too small in relation to its weight and in accordance with the laws of physics can not fly ... But the bumblebee does not know ..."
Regards,
K.Lagan
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 22 Jul 2011, 12:25
by Feliks
In other forum:
[quote=Vicegrip;362904]Correct if you calulate based on single lift pulse per wing cycle. Bees get 2 lifts per wing cycle. People used to think the earth was flat and at the the center too.
Please to let us know how to make complex structures that are both strong enough to self suport and to resist 4000 years of storms? We simple people can see how a simple shape pile of rocks could last in an area that does not see sub 0C temps. Now all you need to do is figure out how to make electricity from a pile of rocks.[/quote]
The pile of rocks:
[quote=BlackTalon;363012]Hmmm, as someone with a structural engineering background, I see potential problems with that structure

[/quote]
[quote=Lupin..the..3rd;363013]Needs more rocks.[/quote]
[quote=Vicegrip;363015]No, I think it needs less air.[/quote]
And I have hope that over the last 4,000 years we have learned, to build something more than just the pyramids and the pyramids....
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 10:55
by Feliks
[QUOTE=Henning;756166]Well, with that lovely airfoil texture, I'm sure that that will start producing usable amounts of energy any time it's within the eyewall of a hurricane....[/QUOTE]
Also such a pile of stones, and a dangerous element of water, politely puts 2000 MW....
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 25 Jul 2011, 10:55
by Feliks
[quote=Vicegrip;363467]Not stones, Concrete with much steel and piping in it. Well under 100 years old and under constant care, maintenance and upgrades. Nothing polite about this project. Read up a bit and you will find it was made out of men and material. 0.0 % clever, 100% brute force and slide rule engineering.[/quote]
Concrete is a pile of stones, only a tiny...
If we use the design of computers, calculators to calculate the type,
http://www.flowmeterdirectory.com/flowm ... _calc.html
http://www.hanleyinnovations.com/vf50.html
It can be 100% clean design
And even more politely 'll gain energy. And then it will be possible, for the next 4000 years.
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 30 Jul 2011, 18:31
by Feliks
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 01 Aug 2011, 18:46
by Feliks
Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 05 Aug 2011, 15:06
by Feliks
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 06 Aug 2011, 12:44
by Feliks
[quote=Mr. Clarkson;72899489]Indeed it is

[/quote]
The Multisnoopy Ship
This is Beautiful.. =D>
This is the modern variant of a sailing ship... so that the sails are not torn...
Regards Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 09 Aug 2011, 21:47
by Feliks
http://www.wired.com/autopia/2010/06/do ... n-the-wind
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNbNNSDl ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPOqlkzW ... re=related
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing_fa ... n_the_wind
Aerodynamic coefficient Cx is very small. It is certainly much smaller than in the traditional ship...
This is not a traditional sail 2D, but the full 3D structure. Energy is processed and used to drive water propeller. Why can swim backwards and forwards. Like a film with 2D fan.
So many of Snoopy Ship has a much higher efficiency due to 3D
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 22 Aug 2011, 20:30
by Feliks
Regards Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 06 Sep 2011, 03:27
by Feliks
Old ideas in new study:
This gear drive in a helicopter that is bothering me. Another way to get rid of her. By the way, turned out that the rear propeller and also you can get rid of , because the helicopter does not have the torque of the main propeller.
The helicopter had already been built. But it had drawbacks: no, for example, could not take full advantage of autorotation, because the propeller with a hole through the center did not have good aerodynamic properties....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sud-Ouest_Djinn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Helic ... _blade.jpg
I missed this problem and the propeller is as it is most optimal.
Also today after assuming control of the helicopter adjustable nozzle (vectoring nozzle) on the outlet gases from the turbine driven, will be very precise.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbomeca_Palouste
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... f_F-35.jpg
In summary the lack of a gear transmission and rear propeller helicopter will certainly reduce weight.
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 08 Sep 2011, 13:26
by Feliks
Here PhotoStream proposal, which has improved aerodynamics and a little stiffness to the system add..
some histo:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9633v6U0wo
http://www.new4stroke.com/percival.pdf
http://www.new4stroke.com/AIAA-Presentation.pdf
Originally posted by Chopper
Welcome back Andrew.
One day it will fly
:eureka
http://tipjet.com/tj_pho_gallry.htm
Andrew

Re: Intake Valve and Feliks' ideas
Posted: 11 Sep 2011, 13:04
by Feliks
Green Engineering in strongbox bank....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPWH5TlbloU
Andrew
