F1technical.net

It seems that Hamilton is developing a Massa-like "specialty" thing. Massa used to be a specialist in Brazil and Turkey. Hamilton seems to be developing a Montreal specialty; as Vettel is with Suzuka and Alonso is with Singapore

I think it´s down to preference of tracks. Some tracks you hate, some you really love and that might be a factor even though it sounds very outlandish.

Obviously they all will do good if the car is in top-shape.

Shock! Do you mean they are human and subject to human fallibility?

That's ruined my "Hamilton for pope" campaign, I even bought him a white suit and shoes for the job.

raymondu999 wrote:It seems that Hamilton is developing a Massa-like "specialty" thing. Massa used to be a specialist in Brazil and Turkey. Hamilton seems to be developing a Montreal specialty; as Vettel is with Suzuka and Alonso is with Singapore

I think alonso cheated his first win, and last year he drove well but was fortunate that vettel made a mistake in qually. and vettel at suzuka? lol his car has been perfect for that track the last two years, i believe he only out qualifed webber by a tenth.

for a techinil board im shocked by the complete sh1t written on here regulary, oh and lolat ringo, mclaren have great traction and mechanical grip.

ell66 wrote: lol you cant be serious? alonso cheated his first win, and last year he drove well but was fortunate that vettel made a mistake in qually. and vettel at suzuka? lol his car has been perfect for that track the last two years, i believe he only out qualifed webber by a tenth.

for a techinil board im shocked by the complete sh1t written on here regulary, oh and lolat ringo, mclaren have great traction and mechanical grip.

Hmmm for a techinil(??) board Im not sure your post is particularly 'technical' or insightful. In fact Id go as far as saying it is sh1t as you put it. Specifically the spelling and the confusing comment

lolat ringo, mclaren have great traction and mechanical grip.

Yeah he's right though, Vettel's car has had Monstrous Downforce since Suzuka came back into the rounds. He's no specialist, just has the best car and bumbling teammate.

richard_leeds wrote:Shock! Do you mean they are human and subject to human fallibility?

That's ruined my "Hamilton for pope" campaign, I even bought him a white suit and shoes for the job.

Jenson is the girl in that relationship!

Sure doesn´t look like it!

HampusA wrote:

CyleB wrote:^^^ what i am saying is that there is no luck with a race like Monaco as late in the race it was it is impossible to overtake something would have had to go terribly wrong for Vettel to lose the kid is an amazing drive and he doesnt need to be sleeping with lady luck to win

There is no such thing as luck but he definitely got some help to fend of the Ferrari and Mclaren at Monaco with the red flag at the end.
He could then put on super softs and as we know, the RBR get´s them up to temperature much quicker the it´s competitors. Which could be seen as he just took of but in the end only was a second ahead.

He´s had some things happen in his favour but it´s racing, next time it might go the other way.

thanks for you 2 cents i was arguing that luck had nothing to do with it

><><><

this really needs to be moved to the Monaco thread

ell66 wrote:

raymondu999 wrote:It seems that Hamilton is developing a Massa-like "specialty" thing. Massa used to be a specialist in Brazil and Turkey. Hamilton seems to be developing a Montreal specialty; as Vettel is with Suzuka and Alonso is with Singapore

lol you cant be serious? alonso cheated his first win, and last year he drove well but was fortunate that vettel made a mistake in qually. and vettel at suzuka? lol his car has been perfect for that track the last two years, i believe he only out qualifed webber by a tenth.

for a techinil board im shocked by the complete sh1t written on here regulary, oh and lolat ringo, mclaren have great traction and mechanical grip.

Alonso was fast all weekend in 2008.

In 2009 he came 3rd in the shitbox Renault.

In 2010 he won despite having an inferior car to the Red Bulls.

He's clearly very strong there.

That is a perfect example of what a turn on articulate intelligence is.
I would hit that in a New York minute.

Esentially she tries not to tell anything interesting, but Peter wasn't enough agressive with his questions too. So it came out like neither of them know what they're talking about Obviously she knows everything, but she just didn't allowed to tell it...

kalinka wrote:Esentially she tries not to tell anything interesting, but Peter wasn't enough agressive with his questions too. So it came out like neither of them know what they're talking about Obviously she knows everything, but she just didn't allowed to tell it...

Excuse me, she was/is brilliant. William Jennings Bryan, and Clarence Darrow together
could not have gotten anything out of her that she was not willing to reveal to Windsor.
On a more personal note; I'd like to teach said brilliant scientist how to "chirp in the key of yodel"
I'll cut you some slack this time. If you dis my woman in the future you will make me angry.
You will not like me when I'm angry. I'll turn this place into a bone yard