Page 213 of 268

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 14:36
by Stu
Snorked wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:08
First photo of the Honda released by them on Twitter

https://i.ibb.co/ZpmjrLxM/honda1.png
https://i.ibb.co/d0nHPp4V/honda2.png
Twin throttle bodies?
Benefits of a a pair of very low profile plenum chambers with no individual cylinder throttle control?
Allowing intercooler to be mounted above engine and rear (bell-housing?) mounted turbo?
AFAIK the split turbo set-up is no longer allowed and no requirement for MGU-H to conveniently mount within the V leaves quite a bit of volume available, would also allow for centreline intercooler and low engine cover height.

Just guessing!!!

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 15:37
by dren
Stu wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 14:36
Snorked wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:08
First photo of the Honda released by them on Twitter

https://i.ibb.co/ZpmjrLxM/honda1.png
https://i.ibb.co/d0nHPp4V/honda2.png
Twin throttle bodies?
Benefits of a a pair of very low profile plenum chambers with no individual cylinder throttle control?
Allowing intercooler to be mounted above engine and rear (bell-housing?) mounted turbo?
AFAIK the split turbo set-up is no longer allowed and no requirement for MGU-H to conveniently mount within the V leaves quite a bit of volume available, would also allow for centreline intercooler and low engine cover height.

Just guessing!!!
Sounds reasonable to me. They'll definitely cram as much into that area now that the H is no longer there.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 15:38
by dren
wuzak wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 14:27
BassVirolla wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:13
At first glance look like variable length runner actuators, but seem to be mounted directly over the valve covers. :wtf:
Which they aren't allowed to have.

Cold they be the high pressure pumps for the fuel?
Seems rather large for the pumps compared to past PUs.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 17:13
by mzso
Snorked wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:08
First photo of the Honda released by them on Twitter
Maybe, they're just greeblies.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 18:49
by vorticism
Looks like two throttle bodies given that there are pivots intersecting them. There is a third charge pipe cover (gold colored) low at the front (could be one of two), which would presumably be arriving through the vee from the compressor. Brighten the photo and it's more visible. I had been wondering how long the inlet stacks would be sans VLIM. The answer here seems to be: very short. These could just be early development parts, so who knows. As for two throttles vs six: reduced pumping losses? I'd say a water-air intercooler could fit between these parts, otherwise, something else I had wanted to post, they stick with Newey's air-air intercooler place it atop the engine and cool it with air from the snorkel.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 19:02
by BassVirolla
wuzak wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 14:27
BassVirolla wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:13
At first glance look like variable length runner actuators, but seem to be mounted directly over the valve covers. :wtf:
Which they aren't allowed to have.

Cold they be the high pressure pumps for the fuel?
Were variable intake runners allowed until 2025, right? I didn't know that they are not allowed anymore.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 19:21
by saviour stivala
mzso wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 17:13
Snorked wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:08
First photo of the Honda released by them on Twitter
Maybe, they're just greeblies.
The act of adding kitbashing, sci-fi modeling, cosplay touch-ups is called greebling.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 20:25
by haza
For anyone wanting to hear a 2026 engine on track here’s Audi today


Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 21:31
by vorticism
vorticism wrote:
05 Jan 2026, 16:43
There seems to be a few surprise freedoms within the turbocharger regs:

https://i.postimg.cc/3N591Byg/turbo-regs.png

F.e. the turbine isn’t demanded to be single-sided, only the compressor is. A dual outlet turbine could provide some new options for wheel ramp profiles and oulet area (think of a double-sided compressor wheel). Also, directionality of flow is not specified, so a radial-outlfow turbine could be pursued. Is the inlet:outet area ratio of a turbocharger turbine considered to be a limiting factor in terms of geometry and packaging?
The periphery of a cylinder has more surface area than its faces. The turbine must fit within a cylinder 40mm long x 100mm dia. Perhaps something like multi-stage expansion can be simulated within one stage by increasing the potential expansion ration. I don't mean this as a strong suggestion, it just seems to be a geometric possibility.

Image
alt link:https://i.postimg.cc/KjttW0Nt/F126turbineconcepts.jpg

In general there is a looming question of: why is a gap of 7” permitted between the compressor and turbine wheels? And how could it be used. Another thought is it may have been requested by someone who wanted an over-the-shaft compressor inlet similar to previous years' Renault and Ferrari installations, except this time turned inward, presumably.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 09 Jan 2026, 22:16
by diffuser
vorticism wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 21:31
vorticism wrote:
05 Jan 2026, 16:43
There seems to be a few surprise freedoms within the turbocharger regs:

https://i.postimg.cc/3N591Byg/turbo-regs.png

F.e. the turbine isn’t demanded to be single-sided, only the compressor is. A dual outlet turbine could provide some new options for wheel ramp profiles and oulet area (think of a double-sided compressor wheel). Also, directionality of flow is not specified, so a radial-outlfow turbine could be pursued. Is the inlet:outet area ratio of a turbocharger turbine considered to be a limiting factor in terms of geometry and packaging?
The periphery of a cylinder has more surface area than its faces. The turbine must fit within a cylinder 40mm long x 100mm dia. Perhaps something like multi-stage expansion can be simulated within one stage by increasing the potential expansion ration. I don't mean this as a strong suggestion, it just seems to be a geometric possibility.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-Ppm1mXoAA ... =4096x4096
alt link:https://i.postimg.cc/KjttW0Nt/F126turbineconcepts.jpg

In general there is a looming question of: why is a gap of 7” permitted between the compressor and turbine wheels? And how could it be used. Another thought is it may have been requested by someone who wanted an over-the-shaft compressor inlet similar to previous years' Renault and Ferrari installations, except this time turned inward, presumably.

Nice pics ...

Could the 7" limit exist primarily to control costs and prevent the use of a split turbo configuration, with the compressor on one side and the turbine on the opposite end of the ICE? It’s possible that beyond 7", axle-related costs begin to rise exponentially. This option appears to leave flexibility while controlling costs?

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 00:36
by Vappy
haza wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 20:25
For anyone wanting to hear a 2026 engine on track here’s Audi today

The 2025 engines were relatively quiet overall unless you were directly behind the exhaust and not super far away. When the wastegate opened on the ferrari and honda, they would become noticeablly louder. I would say, in comparison, the sound from the 2026 engine in this video gives me some hope.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 00:56
by haza
Definitely louder you can hear the car through out the entire lap pretty much even distorts the audio on fly by

https://x.com/insideaudif1/status/20097 ... 77979?s=46

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 02:44
by vorticism
diffuser wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 22:16
Could the 7" limit exist primarily to control costs and prevent the use of a split turbo configuration, with the compressor on one side and the turbine on the opposite end of the ICE? It’s possible that beyond 7", axle-related costs begin to rise exponentially. This option appears to leave flexibility while controlling costs?
Yes. 7" only spans about two cylinders. It can still be considered relatively split, though, compared to a typical turbocharger.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 11:22
by Martin Keene
Stu wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 14:36
Snorked wrote:
09 Jan 2026, 11:08
First photo of the Honda released by them on Twitter

https://i.ibb.co/ZpmjrLxM/honda1.png
https://i.ibb.co/d0nHPp4V/honda2.png
Twin throttle bodies?
Benefits of a a pair of very low profile plenum chambers with no individual cylinder throttle control?
Allowing intercooler to be mounted above engine and rear (bell-housing?) mounted turbo?
AFAIK the split turbo set-up is no longer allowed and no requirement for MGU-H to conveniently mount within the V leaves quite a bit of volume available, would also allow for centreline intercooler and low engine cover height.

Just guessing!!!
They remind me of the blow off valves that Indy Car/Cart used to use. But they were regulation driven to control nobody pressure. So I’d be very surprised if an F1 ran one voluntarily.

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 12:05
by mzso
Vappy wrote:
10 Jan 2026, 00:36
The 2025 engines were relatively quiet overall unless you were directly behind the exhaust and not super far away. When the wastegate opened on the ferrari and honda, they would become noticeablly louder. I would say, in comparison, the sound from the 2026 engine in this video gives me some hope.
haza wrote:
10 Jan 2026, 00:56
Definitely louder you can hear the car through out the entire lap pretty much even distorts the audio on fly by

https://x.com/insideaudif1/status/20097 ... 77979?s=46
It sounds exactly the same as 2025's cars. No need to imagine things.