F1technical.net

forty-two wrote:

Is it really! I've never heard that term before, but now I do it sounds cute! Thanks for the explanation.

Wouldn't fancy sitting on it though, monkey or otherwise it'd be pretty drafty there I'd have thought!

officialsushy wrote:what does monkey seat do.im confused.do they generate download along with the wing

siskue2005 wrote:

forty-two wrote:

Is it really! I've never heard that term before, but now I do it sounds cute! Thanks for the explanation.

Wouldn't fancy sitting on it though, monkey or otherwise it'd be pretty drafty there I'd have thought!

FYI, The monkey seat analogy has been around for more than 2yrs now

Gerhardsa wrote:@Trocola
It seems you are a bit Bias towards the Red team.
Might it have anything todo with you being a spaniard yourself, and Alonso...
What is the point of trying to Crusify Costa? He has made a few very fast cars in his time at Ferrari, some of them winning races and championships....Sour Grapes maybe?
I wish i was that "useless"

raymondu999 wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgC8pvvBoww[/youtube]

Mr.S wrote:

clipsy1H wrote:6 SCHUMACHER MERCEDES 1m24.150s +0.885 51

OMG!! almost 1 sec slow...... and just 51 laps something works wrong in the team!!!!

Maybe Mercedes place Driver number like ferrari on front the wing

TESTING TIMES mean ---. Maybe this is the first year you are checking testing so regularly. But I generally did not tend to follow testing times very regularly but I made an exception last year as I had huge hopes of the WO2. And let me tell you they dont mean anything.

A Carteham can beat a RBR. If they run a hard tyre it can be 1.5s slower than the soft,there is 6-7s difference empty & full Fuel tanks. DRS + KERS counts for 1-1.5s off depending on the track. And then it depends on setups & how hard they are pushing.

clipsy1H wrote:OMFG!!! 121 laps and 1.23.384!!!!!! THIS GUY own everything!!!! GO GO MICHAEL GO GO!!!!!

BTW: some1 ask about RBR and MERC Cloth rear wing. They wanna hide back of the car not only the wing.!!!

GO GO MICHAEL GO GO!!!!

BTW2: This will be the final exhaust position? or they have anothers variants??

GO GO MICHAEL GO GO!!!

n smikle wrote:

mnmracer wrote:

the EDGE wrote:Redbull era....most certainly

Ah yes, because both Red Bulls are doing amazing. If it wasn't for Vettel, Red Bull would have still won an amazing 3 races in 2011! Not like the Schumacher era, when it was all Schumacher and Barichello barely ever came second. Oh wait...

ER.... THAT'S 1 SEASON, IN '10 WEBBER WAS DOING JUST FINE, CLEARLY THE '11 TYRES DID NOT SUIT HIM...WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN FOR THE LAST YEAR?

the EDGE wrote:vettel era....not on your Nelly, he barely won in '10, didn't even top the standings till the very very end

2010 was more than any other recent season influenced by mechanical faillures. Only counting faillures outside the drivers' grip, Vettel lost 62 points, and would have otherwise won the championship with races to spare, and a total of 63 points ahead of Hamilton.

COME ON...AL DRIVERS HAD DNF'S WHICH WERE NOT THEIR FAULT, LETS NOT PLAY THE WHAT IF GAME...IT HAS NO ENDING

bhall2gk wrote:what you said

Why is the Red Bull considered super fast because Vettel (and only Vettel) is bloody good in it, and is the Ferrari considered a bad car because Massa (and only Massa) is fighting back with the Mercedes' and Renaults?

HELLO, ANYBODY WHO THINK THE REDBULL IS NOT BLOODY FAST SHOULD SEE A DOCTOR...QUICK

Hey Webber scored better than Heikki did in 2008 and 2009. And I actually think heikki is faster than Webber (though not as good race craft). The RedBull must be very good. Two WCC back to back. When was the last time I see drivers give up by the 5th race? haha.. All the guys except Webber Gave up by Valencia. The car must be flipping good! haha