Page 62 of 84

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 14:00
by djos
gruntguru wrote:
08 Jan 2018, 10:18
djos wrote:
08 Jan 2018, 05:17
Jolle wrote:
08 Jan 2018, 00:24
Uhm... what intercooler?
My thoughts exactly, it's just a carbon tube with an air filter attached.
That's the air intake. The "intercooler" is (isn't) the piece of aluminium tube running across the engine bay in front of the engine.
my bad, yes just a nice looking intake plenum, no visible intercooling present.

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 14:07
by wesley123
Why would they ever not run an intercooler? Looking at the pic it's not like space is a constraint

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 14:26
by Singabule
wesley123 wrote:
08 Jan 2018, 14:07
Why would they ever not run an intercooler? Looking at the pic it's not like space is a constraint
Not needed, its an alcohol dragster setup.

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 15:41
by flynfrog
roon wrote:
08 Jan 2018, 00:13
An engine with what's left of a corvette attached:

http://speedhunters-wp-production.s3.am ... 00x800.jpg
I am pretty sure that is the kinsler ITB setup. I have been really good if anyone would like to get one for me.

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 19:25
by dren
Volvo D13 Turbo Compounded Diesel

Image

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 19:33
by roon
dren wrote:
08 Jan 2018, 19:25
Volvo D13 Turbo Compounded Diesel

https://www.volvotrucks.us/-/media/vtna ... 2E59658FB8
One unusual feature on this one is the axial-entry, tangential-exit on the turbine to accommodate the PTO.

Image


Also, there's a bellows joint right at the turbine entry. The turboshaft seemingly quite long if directly connected to the compressor i.e. one continuous shaft. Is such a large high-RPM device with a flexing region in its middle a unique achievement?

High res image here for inspection:


http://www.sae.org/dlymagazineimages/14 ... 95_ACT.jpg

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 08 Jan 2018, 19:37
by roon
More of that sweet single-channel low-restriction intercooler.

Image

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 09 Jan 2018, 03:10
by J.A.W.
r101 wrote:
19 Dec 2017, 02:14
J.A.W. wrote:
18 Dec 2017, 12:30
r101 wrote:
17 Dec 2017, 03:07


I remember this! It was on NR750 and 125 HP from that displacement was kinda big deal in 1992.
Hardly.. unless..if by epic, you mean epic fail.. & Yamaha had a 125hp 750 on test - in 1972..
I did not write 'epic' i wrote 'kinda' - as it was totaly new architecture and the engine from the get-go was at (or near) the top for that displacement (not talking racing bikes here or something that was on test bench). The biggest fail on that engine (IMHO) was that it was too heavy.

And, please tell me as I was driving lot of bikes at a time and cannot remember myself, which bike that was sold that year made 125 hp from 750 ccm in 1992 'epic fail'?

Huh? Dunno quite what you are trying to express there.

In 1972 Yamaha had shown their GL 750 4 cyl EI 2T roadbike, but chose to to offer the design for sale - solely as a racing machine, & sold a dud 750 4T twin as the streetbike, instead.

Image

The NR Honda effort was an "epic fail", both as a race bike, & as a production streetbike, no question.

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 00:29
by 63l8qrrfy6
A better intercooler.
With vortex tubes ofc.

Image

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 03:35
by roon
Could have a much shorter pipe if they'd simply drilled a clearance hole through the radiator. Running it through the headlight seems like an odd choice, you'd have to run sealed beams to make sure headlight fluid doesn't get sucked in.

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 12:42
by Jolle
Mudflap wrote:
11 Jan 2018, 00:29
A better intercooler.
With vortex tubes ofc.

https://static.carthrottle.com/workspac ... b3c06d.jpg
An intercooler without a turbo? Interesting...

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 15:33
by Zynerji
He's just mocking me about the vortex tube... 😂😂😂

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 16 Jan 2018, 22:13
by roon
Tommy Cookers wrote:
16 Jan 2018, 14:15
...hairpin valve springs were used in some aircraft aircraft and motorcycle engines...
Image

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 18 Jan 2018, 05:38
by humble sabot
The GN Spider II's 1920s unique chain-driven overhead-cam 4v per cyclinder 90º V twin (since any links appear to be broken in this thread)
Image

I read somewhere that it's effectively dry sumped too. If you can call it that. It uses pump-driven squirters instead of the gravity fed setup it was originally designed with. It's still a near total loss oiling system though.

Re: A shameless image thread for the enginephiles

Posted: 21 Jan 2018, 00:48
by roon
humble sabot wrote:
18 Jan 2018, 05:38
The GN Spider II's 1920s unique chain-driven overhead-cam 4v per cyclinder 90º V twin (since any links appear to be broken in this thread)
http://speedhunters-wp-production.s3.am ... OSE-UP.jpg

I read somewhere that it's effectively dry sumped too. If you can call it that. It uses pump-driven squirters instead of the gravity fed setup it was originally designed with. It's still a near total loss oiling system though.
It's one very sporty tractor.

Image

Image

Image