Page 1 of 2
McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downforce.
Posted: 20 Jan 2015, 22:52
by acosmichippo
Hello everyone,
I was just reading the press releases about McLaren's 650S LE Mans edition (
BBC Article here), and this bit about the louvres over the front wheels sounded odd to me:
"Then there are the front wings with new louvres to reduce pressure over the front wheels and increase downforce."
Wouldn't reducing pressure above the wheels
by definition also reduce downforce? Can someone explain how these things work?
Does it reduce pressure in the wheel
well? That would make more sense.
Here's a pic for reference:

Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 20 Jan 2015, 23:01
by Paul
Exactly, they bleed the high pressure air, thus reducing lift/producing down-force.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 20 Jan 2015, 23:04
by wesley123
Yes, they reduce pressure build up in the wheel well and prevent air bleeding in the underbody by providing an alternate path. This reduces the lift.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 20 Jan 2015, 23:05
by acosmichippo
In that case, why don't more cars have them? Seems like a pretty simple way to increase downforce.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 20 Jan 2015, 23:17
by Paul
Probably balance. Road cars usually are designed with inherent under-steer, so more lift at the front is OK as long as there is similar lift being produced at the back.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 20 Jan 2015, 23:25
by bdr529
acosmichippo wrote:In that case, why don't more cars have them? Seems like a pretty simple way to increase downforce.
Sorry couldn't resist, it's the first thing that came to mind

Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 21 Jan 2015, 01:40
by MadMatt
As Paul said, you want under-steer on a road car, therefore, enhancing front downforce is not really wanted. What you want is to reduce rear axle lift. I have to add that a lot of the lift produced in the front wheel well is generated by the air pushing up under the tyre's front face (aka when you look at the car's left side from the side, the quarter at the bottom left).
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 21 Jan 2015, 06:43
by ylk1
I believe TVR Sagaris had such vents in it's initial form. Then later, they removed them as dust and stones keep thrown onto the windshield. This was mentioned in the TopGear's episode too. May be McLaren 650S being a track car, they allowed them.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 21 Jan 2015, 08:48
by No Lotus
MadMatt wrote:As Paul said, you want under-steer on a road car, therefore, enhancing front downforce is not really wanted. What you want is to reduce rear axle lift. I have to add that a lot of the lift produced in the front wheel well is generated by the air pushing up under the tyre's front face (aka when you look at the car's left side from the side, the quarter at the bottom left).
Yes. I have a patented retractable wheel fairing system and when deployed they defeat this lift, as confirmed by CFD. The same is true for the rears, but the lift back there is less marked.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 21 Jan 2015, 12:13
by andylaurence
I fitted louvres to my car and can confirm that rain/stones/grit/rubber come flying out of them. If it's wet, then the dirty water flows neatly over the bodywork making the car dirty in moments. On the flip side, the car's faster...
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 21 Jan 2015, 16:59
by acosmichippo
seems like you could eliminate most debris by fitting a wire mesh in the louvres.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 21 Jan 2015, 22:41
by MadMatt
The positioning of the louvers is also very important. People tend to fit them as far up front as they can in a longitudinal plane, but I cannot really see any relevant research proving that concept. I believe it has to do with what I explained, the high pressure in front of the tyre, as there is indeed a low pressure area behind the wheel so why would you want to exhaust it on top of the car, hence the louvers located at the front of the wheel well.
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 22 Jan 2015, 00:24
by SectorOne
acosmichippo wrote:In that case, why don't more cars have them? Seems like a pretty simple way to increase downforce.
Except that your "supercar" also needs to handle everyday life and having giant holes sending rocks straight up in the air is not so good for your car and others
If you´re talking about racing cars, they are there in all kinds of variations.

Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 22 Jan 2015, 05:25
by J.A.W.
Well now, y'all do realize that them good ol' NASCAR boys already done had them thangs.. `bout 1/2 a century back..
See here..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9ZSNM8MweA
Re: McLaren 650S Le Mans - question about louvres and downfo
Posted: 22 Jan 2015, 12:24
by Cold Fussion
SectorOne wrote:acosmichippo wrote:In that case, why don't more cars have them? Seems like a pretty simple way to increase downforce.
Except that your "supercar" also needs to handle everyday life and having giant holes sending rocks straight up in the air is not so good for your car and others
If you´re talking about racing cars, they are there in all kinds of variations.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... C_Fuji.jpg
That's purely by regulation. When rules for giant holes above the wheels weren't there, no LMP1 car run with such giant holes, they all featured louvers.