McLaren MCL33

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 2:18 pm
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

charliesmithhd wrote:
Fri Dec 07, 2018 5:32 pm
With all these changes what is a reasonable potistion for the team to aim for? P4? Maybe challenging Redbull if Honda are worse off than Renault?

Back fighting at the front of the midfield pack would be ideal, with the aim of closing the gap down to the front runners in 2020 when they hve a lot more of the staff/structure sorted out.

M840TR
M840TR
314
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

Renault is less of a threat compared to Force India and Sauber. The latter shifted focus on 2019 the earliest of anyone and both of them have secured a lot of funding recently, even without which they were consistently fighting for 4th. Renault needs to sort out their engine if they want to move up ahead.

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:12 am

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

M840TR wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 12:12 pm
Renault is less of a threat compared to Force India and Sauber. The latter and both of them have secured a lot of funding recently, even without which they were consistently fighting for 4th. Renault needs to sort out their engine if they want to move up ahead.
IMO Renault shifted focus on 2019 the earliest of anyone (after Mclaren maybe) and has the biggest progression margin with Mclaren. Mclaren and Renault are similar this year; they also have built a B version of their 2017 car...
Sauber was clearly working on this very complex 2018 car since forever; they've invested all the time and ressources they've saved during 2016 and 2017, in the 2018 car.
But we're getting off topic.

M840TR
M840TR
314
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

Image

via forthegoats on Reddit
Last edited by M840TR on Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.

wesley123
wesley123
204
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 4:55 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

What's up with the gills next to the radiator?
"Bite my shiny metal ass" - Bender

M840TR
M840TR
314
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

wesley123 wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:16 pm
What's up with the gills next to the radiator?
Probably exhaust cooling.

User avatar
lio007
316
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Austria

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

M840TR wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:05 pm
https://i.redd.it/uivpa560f8321.jpg

via forthegoats on Reddit
Oh..unfortunately the image has been deleted!

What was it about?

M840TR
M840TR
314
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

lio007 wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 1:12 pm
M840TR wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:05 pm
https://i.redd.it/uivpa560f8321.jpg

via forthegoats on Reddit
Oh..unfortunately the image has been deleted!

What was it about?
Re uploaded.

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:12 am

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

A Nice pic. It shows how Mclaren didnt exploit all that empty space above the engine that Renault has freed up thanks to the new intake plenum, to relocate some of the cooling system there, like Renault and RB did.
It's quite strange because Mclaren was doing exactly that with the Honda powerunit; many coolers where placed above the engine... This year, Mclaren decided to put everything in the sidepods. But why?
The 2018 Renault had less cooling demands then the 2017 Honda according to Boullier (hence the smaller 2018 sidepod intakes ?) That partly answers the question...
Maybe they wanted to lower the CoG... even the compressor air-filter is placed very low, just above the turbo, not exactly likethe Renault and the RB.
(it looks as if this airbox has been designed around a 2017 Renault plenum)

Nice little NACA intake on the internal bodywork near the turbo/wastegate :P

User avatar
ScrewCaptain27
577
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:13 am
Location: Udine, Italy

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

It’s a very clean installation, I’m surprised at the amount of empty space behind the airbox though it looks like something has been removed.
"Stupid people do stupid things. Smart people outsmart each other, then themselves."
- Serj Tankian

M840TR
M840TR
314
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

Blackout wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:32 pm
A Nice pic. It shows how Mclaren didnt exploit all that empty space above the engine that Renault has freed up thanks to the new intake plenum, to relocate some of the cooling system there, like Renault and RB did.
It's quite strange because Mclaren was doing exactly that with the Honda powerunit; many coolers where placed above the engine... This year, Mclaren decided to put everything in the sidepods. But why?
The 2018 Renault had less cooling demands then the 2017 Honda according to Boullier (hence the smaller 2018 sidepod intakes ?) That partly answers the question...
Maybe they wanted to lower the CoG... even the compressor air-filter is placed very low, just above the turbo, not exactly likethe Renault and the RB.
(it looks as if this airbox has been designed around a 2017 Renault plenum)

Nice little NACA intake on the internal bodywork near the turbo/wastegate :P
They didn't exploit it on purpose. CoG gains over aero. Honda required a lot of extra ancillary coolers so they had no choice. It's really the same plenum as last year, without the two compressor ducts.

User avatar
Blackout
1566
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:12 am

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

M840TR wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:37 am
Blackout wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:32 pm
A Nice pic. It shows how Mclaren didnt exploit all that empty space above the engine that Renault has freed up thanks to the new intake plenum, to relocate some of the cooling system there, like Renault and RB did.
It's quite strange because Mclaren was doing exactly that with the Honda powerunit; many coolers where placed above the engine... This year, Mclaren decided to put everything in the sidepods. But why?
The 2018 Renault had less cooling demands then the 2017 Honda according to Boullier (hence the smaller 2018 sidepod intakes ?) That partly answers the question...
Maybe they wanted to lower the CoG... even the compressor air-filter is placed very low, just above the turbo, not exactly likethe Renault and the RB.
(it looks as if this airbox has been designed around a 2017 Renault plenum)

Nice little NACA intake on the internal bodywork near the turbo/wastegate :P
They didn't exploit it on purpose. CoG gains over aero. Honda required a lot of extra ancillary coolers so they had no choice. It's really the same plenum as last year, without the two compressor ducts.
Which plenum and compressor ducts?

M840TR
M840TR
314
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:04 pm

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

Blackout wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 8:14 am
M840TR wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 7:37 am
Blackout wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:32 pm
A Nice pic. It shows how Mclaren didnt exploit all that empty space above the engine that Renault has freed up thanks to the new intake plenum, to relocate some of the cooling system there, like Renault and RB did.
It's quite strange because Mclaren was doing exactly that with the Honda powerunit; many coolers where placed above the engine... This year, Mclaren decided to put everything in the sidepods. But why?
The 2018 Renault had less cooling demands then the 2017 Honda according to Boullier (hence the smaller 2018 sidepod intakes ?) That partly answers the question...
Maybe they wanted to lower the CoG... even the compressor air-filter is placed very low, just above the turbo, not exactly likethe Renault and the RB.
(it looks as if this airbox has been designed around a 2017 Renault plenum)

Nice little NACA intake on the internal bodywork near the turbo/wastegate :P
They didn't exploit it on purpose. CoG gains over aero. Honda required a lot of extra ancillary coolers so they had no choice. It's really the same plenum as last year, without the two compressor ducts.
Which plenum and compressor ducts?
Image

Image

Bill
Bill
8
Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 9:28 am

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

Mclaren has been slower than last year in lap times from spa to abudhabi even though types are one step softer part of the reason is the Honda pu gave them advantages such as weight, good drivability,compact size. They could not reproduce that with the Renault pu , its all well and good to talk about great chassis but you build that around an engine.Mclaren never acknowledged the important contribution Honda was making to their concern they only painted them as a loser

f1rules
f1rules
594
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2004 2:34 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: McLaren MCL33

Post

good thing im not a f1 engineer because this looks very well integrated through my glasses with an obvious focus on a low CoG, but something clearly doesnt work

M840TR wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 12:05 pm
https://i.imgur.com/CqC3AQ0.jpg

via forthegoats on Reddit