Scuderia Ferrari SF90

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter does not belong here.
Tzk
Tzk
20
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2018 11:49 am

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

Ringleheim wrote:
What does he mean "The whole car is positioned in that area" ???

good!
I expect that they estimate required levels of downforce ( like min+max for the season) and they then optimize drag. Now, if they‘ve estimated the required baseline df too low, they can‘t increase their df without losing aero efficiency.

Mercedes probably knew this and thus went with the conventional frontwing and concept.



wickedz50
wickedz50
2
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2013 7:32 am

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

2020 probably...there is no chance of any major change happenning this year .

Jozsusz
Jozsusz
-5
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2019 12:09 am

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post


Kantzila
Kantzila
0
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:27 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

Jozsusz wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:08 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ZCbGuWaCk

Well, well, well...
So, according to Rosberg, they developed the car "incorrectly" with the car lacking downforce and a new rear-wing (designed to provide that extra needed downforce efficiently) still in the works.

User avatar
Jordan44
12
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 4:06 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

Kantzila wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:33 pm
Jozsusz wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:08 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ZCbGuWaCk

Well, well, well...
So, according to Rosberg, they developed the car "incorrectly" with the car lacking downforce and a new rear-wing (designed to provide that extra needed downforce efficiently) still in the works.
Well he actually said a new rear wing may not solve the problem because it could make the downforce they are generating and overall car inefficient

mmred
mmred
-3
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

wickedz50 wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:57 pm
2020 probably...there is no chance of any major change happenning this year .
merc rewrote its car last year after barcellona exactly because they had low downforce
good to know you are an optimist

dtro
dtro
5
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 6:39 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

Kantzila wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:33 pm
Jozsusz wrote:
Sat Apr 13, 2019 9:08 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1ZCbGuWaCk

Well, well, well...
So, according to Rosberg, they developed the car "incorrectly" with the car lacking downforce and a new rear-wing (designed to provide that extra needed downforce efficiently) still in the works.
Rosberg is a superhero just like Newey and has CFD vision? I had no clue.

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:36 pm
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

Aren't you guys a bit ahead with the "no downforce"? The same was being discussed last race... In the W10 topic!

Let's wait the conjecture a bit longer across several races. Conjecture includes what Rosberg is saying. He is no engineer. Yes he might (or might not) have good sources, but we can't necessarily take his word for it.
#AeroFrodo

mmred
mmred
-3
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

turbof1 wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:50 am
Aren't you guys a bit ahead with the "no downforce"? The same was being discussed last race... In the W10 topic!

Let's wait the conjecture a bit longer across several races. Conjecture includes what Rosberg is saying. He is no engineer. Yes he might (or might not) have good sources, but we can't necessarily take his word for it.
nahhh
the end of the world ( pardon of the championship ) has already begun

User avatar
ScrewCaptain27
539
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2017 12:13 am
Location: Udine, Italy

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

Rear brake drum:
Image
Photo by Racecar Engineering
"Stupid people do stupid things. Smart people outsmart each other, then themselves."
- Serj Tankian

GrandAxe
GrandAxe
19
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:06 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

turbof1 wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:50 am
Aren't you guys a bit ahead with the "no downforce"? The same was being discussed last race... In the W10 topic!

Let's wait the conjecture a bit longer across several races. Conjecture includes what Rosberg is saying. He is no engineer. Yes he might (or might not) have good sources, but we can't necessarily take his word for it.
The downforce argument will only get deservedly stronger after this weekend.

mmred
mmred
-3
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

GrandAxe wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:26 am
turbof1 wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:50 am
Aren't you guys a bit ahead with the "no downforce"? The same was being discussed last race... In the W10 topic!

Let's wait the conjecture a bit longer across several races. Conjecture includes what Rosberg is saying. He is no engineer. Yes he might (or might not) have good sources, but we can't necessarily take his word for it.
The downforce argument will only get deservedly stronger after this weekend.
5 seconds in a hour race seems a pretty recoverable gap, aero choices suited for this track or not ( and i think it is strange they will wait spain for the new aero package to recover it )

GrandAxe
GrandAxe
19
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 4:06 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

mmred wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:30 am
GrandAxe wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:26 am
turbof1 wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 2:50 am
Aren't you guys a bit ahead with the "no downforce"? The same was being discussed last race... In the W10 topic!

Let's wait the conjecture a bit longer across several races. Conjecture includes what Rosberg is saying. He is no engineer. Yes he might (or might not) have good sources, but we can't necessarily take his word for it.
The downforce argument will only get deservedly stronger after this weekend.
5 seconds in a hour race seems a pretty recoverable gap, aero choices suited for this track or not ( and i think it is strange they will wait spain for the new aero package to recover it )
5 seconds is easily recoverable, true. But Ferrari's aero issue really came to the fore on this track, the understeery front end refuses to bite. Did you notice how much front tyre locking both cars had through the race?

Ferrari seems to have gone for a low downforce, high engine power, high speed configuration. Unfortunately though, the engine seems to have reliability problems that means that any gains from high speed are lost, in turn, making their low downforce very costly.

If an aero package is not due until Spain, then it must be a pretty comprehensive one, perhaps they might even (hopefully) change their front wing style. If the engine gremlins are easier to fix, then might keep their present configuration and become a real bullet on the track - a monster, particularly at tracks like Spa and Monza.

User avatar
siskue2005
170
Joined: Fri May 11, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

GrandAxe wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:19 am
mmred wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:30 am
GrandAxe wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:26 am


The downforce argument will only get deservedly stronger after this weekend.
5 seconds in a hour race seems a pretty recoverable gap, aero choices suited for this track or not ( and i think it is strange they will wait spain for the new aero package to recover it )
5 seconds is easily recoverable, true. But Ferrari's aero issue really came to the fore on this track, the understeery front end refuses to bite. Did you notice how much front tyre locking both cars had through the race?

Ferrari seems to have gone for a low downforce, high engine power, high speed configuration. Unfortunately though, the engine seems to have reliability problems that means that any gains from high speed are lost, in turn, making their low downforce very costly.

If an aero package is not due until Spain, then it must be a pretty comprehensive one, perhaps they might even (hopefully) change their front wing style. If the engine gremlins are easier to fix, then might keep their present configuration and become a real bullet on the track - a monster, particularly at tracks like Spa and Monza.
do they lack front downforce? their front wing philosophy could be the culprit?

mmred
mmred
-3
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: Scuderia Ferrari SF90

Post

GrandAxe wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:19 am
mmred wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:30 am
GrandAxe wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:26 am


The downforce argument will only get deservedly stronger after this weekend.
5 seconds in a hour race seems a pretty recoverable gap, aero choices suited for this track or not ( and i think it is strange they will wait spain for the new aero package to recover it )
5 seconds is easily recoverable, true. But Ferrari's aero issue really came to the fore on this track, the understeery front end refuses to bite. Did you notice how much front tyre locking both cars had through the race?

Ferrari seems to have gone for a low downforce, high engine power, high speed configuration. Unfortunately though, the engine seems to have reliability problems that means that any gains from high speed are lost, in turn, making their low downforce very costly.

If an aero package is not due until Spain, then it must be a pretty comprehensive one, perhaps they might even (hopefully) change their front wing style. If the engine gremlins are easier to fix, then might keep their present configuration and become a real bullet on the track - a monster, particularly at tracks like Spa and Monza.
the front locks have more to do with brake balance and slowering very much at slow corners

remember they have a problem in slow ones, on fast corners they alread have a bit of advantage instead (barhein...)
so it s a mixed situation,like last year mercedes at the first races, plus the engine advantage , bots allowing, is a better resource merc didnt have last year....

we can see a recover if the aero department delivers