Cool to see Vettel's rear lights not turning on at the end of the straight. MAXimum deploymentJuzh wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:19 pmverstappen vs vettel second stint battle:
https://streamable.com/fokig
https://streamable.com/fokig
Vettel got saved there by the racing point holding up verstappen just enough time
i believe they had only left a couple of used softs, and the softs weren't that good as the hard tyrespb6797 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:32 pmHas anyone seen any reasoning for why Ferrari put Leclerc on Mediums for the final 13 laps? I'd have expected the softs to last that long and give him enough advantage to catch Verstappen, so does it imply the Ferrari was devouring its tyres and they didn't think softs would last 13 laps to the end of the Grand Prix?
Interesting, since Red Bull put Gasly onto the Softs (based on Pirelli's tyre chart they also only had used sets left) - but I guess Red Bull were only going for a glory run and didn't have to worry about them dropping off a cliff afterwards?Capharol wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:58 pmi believe they had only left a couple of used softs, and the softs weren't that good as the hard tyrespb6797 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:32 pmHas anyone seen any reasoning for why Ferrari put Leclerc on Mediums for the final 13 laps? I'd have expected the softs to last that long and give him enough advantage to catch Verstappen, so does it imply the Ferrari was devouring its tyres and they didn't think softs would last 13 laps to the end of the Grand Prix?
exactly.... RB put Gasly on the soft tyre with only 3-4 laps to go, he had a gap behind him that was enough to do this so he could take the fastest lap (guess it was more to secure that 1 point, that would have gone to Vettel)pb6797 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 9:13 pmInteresting, since Red Bull put Gasly onto the Softs (based on Pirelli's tyre chart they also only had used sets left) - but I guess Red Bull were only going for a glory run and didn't have to worry about them dropping off a cliff afterwards?Capharol wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:58 pmi believe they had only left a couple of used softs, and the softs weren't that good as the hard tyrespb6797 wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:32 pmHas anyone seen any reasoning for why Ferrari put Leclerc on Mediums for the final 13 laps? I'd have expected the softs to last that long and give him enough advantage to catch Verstappen, so does it imply the Ferrari was devouring its tyres and they didn't think softs would last 13 laps to the end of the Grand Prix?
He's usually pretty decent, but he dropped the ball on one of his videos earlier this weekend.zeph wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:37 pmI don’t get the Rosberg haterade.
His commentary is usually knowledgeable and on point, he is the most recent world champion (other than Hamilton), the only commentator who has raced against the majority of the current grid, and who has personal experience with modern F1. He understands strategy and the mental strain drivers are under. I can’t think of anyone better qualified for the job.
I'm on my second helping of humble pie. The race was a bit Meh. Like Melbourne, it was over after the first half lap. That being said, it's crazy insane how close the bulk of the midfield is in terms of performance, and who comes out on top on any given Sunday is going to come down to getting the car set up right."Hamilton and fast off the line starts are like oil and water." - TAG, just yesterday.
I think yes 50% setup, 35% getting that killer qualy lap in that has a few tenths in driver performance above their rivals, and 15% getting a great start. I'm glad there are so many driver changes and rookies combined with this great midfield battle... the lack of battle for 1st is depressing so at least we have the midfield battle to appreciate. Good that F1 coverage these days shows the midfield battles far better than most racing TV coverage did for most of my life up to now.TAG wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:37 pmI'm on my second helping of humble pie. The race was a bit Meh. Like Melbourne, it was over after the first half lap. That being said, it's crazy insane how close the bulk of the midfield is in terms of performance, and who comes out on top on any given Sunday is going to come down to getting the car set up right."Hamilton and fast off the line starts are like oil and water." - TAG, just yesterday.
Verstappen is a very good driver. I still think he's a arrogant spoiled brat but that's besides the point. He's a racing driver's racing driver. I was great seeing him fight for something that was just too far out of reach today but he was still pushing. It's a shame that Honda and Renault are fighting so hard to see who's got the 4th best PU.
I don't either for the most part.zeph wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:37 pmI don’t get the Rosberg haterade.
His commentary is usually knowledgeable and on point, he is the most recent world champion (other than Hamilton), the only commentator who has raced against the majority of the current grid, and who has personal experience with modern F1. He understands strategy and the mental strain drivers are under. I can’t think of anyone better qualified for the job.
I'll tell you what I don't like; In most of his commentary, he has a bit of a sensationalist tone and is quite vocal in his criticism. He also appears to be very opinionated. I much prefer the 'tone' and IMO more objective/neutral journalism from ex-drivers such as Karun Chandhok and Jolyon Palmer to name two. There's also something about Rosbergs 'smirk' that just rubs me the wrong way too.zeph wrote: ↑Sun Apr 14, 2019 8:37 pmI don’t get the Rosberg haterade.
His commentary is usually knowledgeable and on point, he is the most recent world champion (other than Hamilton), the only commentator who has raced against the majority of the current grid, and who has personal experience with modern F1. He understands strategy and the mental strain drivers are under. I can’t think of anyone better qualified for the job.