TD039

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
Post Reply
f1motta
64
Joined: 07 Apr 2011, 09:28

Re: TD039

Post

Yesterday I had a nice chat with Scarbs: :D


f1jcw
17
Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 21:15

Re: TD039

Post

Posted on Twitter

Image


User avatar
chrisc90
36
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: TD039

Post

Would you not need a 2-piece for the spring bib at the front?

f1jcw
17
Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 21:15

Re: TD039

Post

chrisc90 wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 12:47
Would you not need a 2-piece for the spring bib at the front?
If you are springing the 1st section, could that be setup as a cantilever to then create a ^ in the floor

User avatar
214270
16
Joined: 27 Apr 2019, 18:49

Re: TD039

Post

Rb wear pattern is odd. Why would that section be clean south of the front legality holes around the hinge?
Team ANTI-HYPE. Prove it, then I’ll anoint you.

Sevach
1043
Joined: 07 Jun 2012, 17:00

Re: TD039

Post

Scarbs put out a thread on his twitter.

f1jcw
17
Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 21:15

Re: TD039

Post

This is plank flexing though or is it related

On the graphic I've posted, it is a bit dubious that the merc picture has a overlay over it.
I think theres a unobscured one elsewhere

User avatar
organic
948
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: TD039

Post



Mika will be back before this TD comes in

f1jcw
17
Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 21:15

Re: TD039

Post

organic wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:05


Mika will be back before this TD comes in
absolutely unbelieveable
should just DSQ teams failing it now

User avatar
chrisc90
36
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: TD039

Post

f1jcw wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:06
organic wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:05


Mika will be back before this TD comes in
What if there is no teams failing it?
absolutely unbelieveable
should just DSQ teams failing it now

morefirejules08
4
Joined: 11 Feb 2012, 14:21

Re: TD039

Post

f1jcw wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:06
organic wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:05


Mika will be back before this TD comes in
absolutely unbelieveable
should just DSQ teams failing it now
Let’s hope someone protests at the next couple of races. Allowing teams 4 races and nearly 2 months to “fix” an a potential contravention of the regulations is ridiculous in my mind.

User avatar
RZS10
359
Joined: 07 Dec 2013, 01:23

Re: TD039

Post

Funny, this, giving teams two more races (but more importantly one extra month) to make the necessary changes to make their cars compliant ... especially considering that everyone keeps saying that no one has to change anything on their cars and that none of it is a concern for them and the sensor used for the metric is in all cars anyways and they have several races in which they can have more bouncing than the AOM allows.

f1jcw
17
Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 21:15

Re: TD039

Post

morefirejules08 wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:21
f1jcw wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:06
organic wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:05


Mika will be back before this TD comes in
absolutely unbelieveable
should just DSQ teams failing it now
Let’s hope someone protests at the next couple of races. Allowing teams 4 races and nearly 2 months to “fix” an a potential contravention of the regulations is ridiculous in my mind.
Its a plank of wood, what exactly takes time to resolve that.

User avatar
214270
16
Joined: 27 Apr 2019, 18:49

Re: TD039

Post

RZS10 wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:27
Funny, this, giving teams two more races (but more importantly one extra month) to make the necessary changes to make their cars compliant ... especially considering that everyone keeps saying that no one has to change anything on their cars and that none of it is a concern for them and the sensor used for the metric is in all cars anyways and they have several races in which they can have more bouncing than the AOM allows.
Yeah, that part’s funny. If no one needs to change their car as they’ve been letting us know, then decouple it from the rest of the porpoising directives and implement now. Instead, more time is being given; amazing
Team ANTI-HYPE. Prove it, then I’ll anoint you.

f1jcw
17
Joined: 21 Feb 2019, 21:15

Re: TD039

Post

RZS10 wrote:
08 Jul 2022, 14:27
Funny, this, giving teams two more races (but more importantly one extra month) to make the necessary changes to make their cars compliant ... especially considering that everyone keeps saying that no one has to change anything on their cars and that none of it is a concern for them and the sensor used for the metric is in all cars anyways and they have several races in which they can have more bouncing than the AOM allows.
If teams lose any significat time once it is introduced then this season will again be proven invalid, aided yet again by FIA

Post Reply