Like Williams did last year with Mercedesf1316 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 21, 2025 4:44 pmConfirmation on Haas not taking the front suspension and everything but confirmation it’s a pull rod: https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/ferr ... nt-follow/
https://scuderiafans.com/ferrari-projec ... 25-f1-car/Engine maps have also been optimized for a noticeable gain in qualifying lap times. The Italian media asked for a specific time gain in tenths, but to avoid creating expectations, the source said they are very optimistic, with a significant advantage over the SF-24.
Significant advantage can mean anything. Not purely speed related. Probably also driveability, energy management.. etc.f1316 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:04 amAll speculation of course but interesting that power unit gains continue to be included in the rumours:
https://scuderiafans.com/ferrari-projec ... 25-f1-car/Engine maps have also been optimized for a noticeable gain in qualifying lap times. The Italian media asked for a specific time gain in tenths, but to avoid creating expectations, the source said they are very optimistic, with a significant advantage over the SF-24.
Indeed. Could be engine reliability and durability, meaning higher performance in qualy, and then naturally the race.F1NAC wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 10:23 amSignificant advantage can mean anything. Not purely speed related. Probably also driveability, energy management.. etc.f1316 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 3:04 amAll speculation of course but interesting that power unit gains continue to be included in the rumours:
https://scuderiafans.com/ferrari-projec ... 25-f1-car/Engine maps have also been optimized for a noticeable gain in qualifying lap times. The Italian media asked for a specific time gain in tenths, but to avoid creating expectations, the source said they are very optimistic, with a significant advantage over the SF-24.
These are all speculative based on hearsay. We won't find out until the first preseason test dayHenri wrote: ↑Wed Jan 22, 2025 11:19 amhttps://f1ingenerale.com/f1/news-f1/f1- ... e-leclerc/
This site has leaks of what the sf25 will look like.. will look like the rb20![]()
I saw this, but how on Earth can anyone know who found more or less, when no one knows any actual data?f1316 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 1:33 pmIn this video Martin Brundle briefly makes reference to the feeling (the rumour) that Ferrari may have found more over the winter than the others, like McLaren:
Very non specific and insubstantial but often this stuff tends to leak out, so could be a good sign.
These are common messages in the winter period. The closer to the pre-season tests, the more "leaks" and insider hints there will be that the Red team was able to find an additional 0.5-1.5 sec per lap, numbers in the wind tunnel are encouraging and engineers can barely hide their smiles and optimism.sucof wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:04 pmI saw this, but how on Earth can anyone know who found more or less, when no one knows any actual data?f1316 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 1:33 pmIn this video Martin Brundle briefly makes reference to the feeling (the rumour) that Ferrari may have found more over the winter than the others, like McLaren:
Very non specific and insubstantial but often this stuff tends to leak out, so could be a good sign.
This is just logically faulty, and impossible. Except if there is some kind of information transfer going on between the teams, but that would be crazy.
By whom? I think it is not in the benefit of Ferrari to message its opponents that it is ahead. If that would be the case, no one would go full sandbagging during the tests, but they all are.jumpingfish wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:38 pmThese are common messages in the winter period. The closer to the pre-season tests, the more "leaks" and insider hints there will be that the Red team was able to find an additional 0.5-1.5 sec per lap, numbers in the wind tunnel are encouraging and engineers can barely hide their smiles and optimism.sucof wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:04 pmI saw this, but how on Earth can anyone know who found more or less, when no one knows any actual data?f1316 wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 1:33 pmIn this video Martin Brundle briefly makes reference to the feeling (the rumour) that Ferrari may have found more over the winter than the others, like McLaren:
Very non specific and insubstantial but often this stuff tends to leak out, so could be a good sign.
This is just logically faulty, and impossible. Except if there is some kind of information transfer going on between the teams, but that would be crazy.![]()
It happened with AM on the lead up to 2023 to be fair. There were various rumours from journalists (and even Horner) that the '23 Aston Martin was showing big numbers in the wind tunnel and would be the surprise of the season.sucof wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 5:20 pmBy whom? I think it is not in the benefit of Ferrari to message its opponents that it is ahead. If that would be the case, no one would go full sandbagging during the tests, but they all are.jumpingfish wrote: ↑Fri Jan 24, 2025 3:38 pmThese are common messages in the winter period. The closer to the pre-season tests, the more "leaks" and insider hints there will be that the Red team was able to find an additional 0.5-1.5 sec per lap, numbers in the wind tunnel are encouraging and engineers can barely hide their smiles and optimism.![]()
I think these are just rumours made by fans and silly journalists.
A teams interest is to lay low, work hard, not sharing any info, regardless if it is good or bad.
The only way such rumours can be true is if a team member can not hold its mouth shot, but that is a very bad team member imho.
I’ve said this earlier in the thread but often with these pre season rumours there’s no smoke without fire - in addition to the AM example, I remember the rumours about the 2012 Ferrari being bad emerged early. The paddock - including the journalists - is a tight knit community that flies round the world together most of the year and people talk. It’s not to be relied on but often there turns out to be a bit of truth in there.