Page 1 of 1
Why Rossi didn't get the place in Ferrari
Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 19:34
by manchild
It is not my work but I like the idea

Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 20:32
by West
That made my day. Work sucks!
Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 20:37
by jddh1
I'd like to see the mid-season upgrades for this "type" of driving a ferrari.
Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 21:04
by Militia Est Vita
They might have to implant some carbonfibre sidepods on Rossi's spine and that should do

Thanks again to Mr Jim Bamber
Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 21:17
by Tom
Posted: 03 Jul 2007, 23:30
by modbaraban
Apparently he tried more than once

Re: Thanks again to Mr Jim Bamber
Posted: 05 Jul 2007, 04:56
by ds.raikkonen
Tom wrote:
I wuz thinking bout the same pic until you posted it, pretty good
Well, if i might say, Rossi is losing his edge these days, the dominance is gone, although Assen was P1 for him, Casey Stoner has kept him honest. Blame the Michelin tyres on his FIAT-Yamaha. Hes got too much MotoGP in his blood now to get in an F1 racer, hed probably lean in his cockpit on every corner

... also drove a WRC car, Subaru, i think..and commented that its more challenging than F1.
its like asking Schumi to become a rider!
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 17:46
by TERRASTAR18
i say give him a chance he would better than ralfie or liuzzi...
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 18:07
by jddh1
TERRASTAR18 wrote:i say give him a chance he would better than ralfie or liuzzi...
I'm not so sure about that.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 18:54
by TERRASTAR18
jddh1 wrote:TERRASTAR18 wrote:i say give him a chance he would better than ralfie or liuzzi...
I'm not so sure about that.
rossi is still young, ralph is and liuzzi always breaks down. i say give rossi and bordais a shot.
Posted: 19 Jul 2007, 23:05
by jddh1
TERRASTAR18 wrote:jddh1 wrote:TERRASTAR18 wrote:i say give him a chance he would better than ralfie or liuzzi...
I'm not so sure about that.
rossi is still young, ralph is and liuzzi always breaks down. i say give rossi and bordais a shot.
Well, as far as Bourdais goes, he'll race next season. He already signed his contract. I don't know how well he'll fare in F1, considering that he doesn't like the blocking maneuvers the driver in front of him makes.
But Rossi needs so much training and practice to race in F1. In motorcycle racing, the rider is much more important in machine-rider combination, whereas in F1 a little bit less. That is my belief of course, but the reason I say that is that in moto racing the track seems so much wider and there's a lot more lines of racing simply due to the width of the machine. So with his talent alone, Rossi cannot be as crucial to a team in F1 as he is to his MotoGP team.
Re: Thanks again to Mr Jim Bamber
Posted: 20 Jul 2007, 09:15
by mx_tifoso
ds.raikkonen wrote:its like asking Schumi to become a rider!
Not exactly........
MS has never raced bikes, but Rossi has raced on four wheels, karts to be more specific.
So it doesnt make sense to make that comparison between the two.