Page 1 of 3
Photo comparison between Honda 2006-Super Aguri 2007
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 17:14
by bar555
For Belatti who asked for such a comparison . It would take some time to finish this project but i will keep posting every new photo-comparison picture that i finish .
I will try to point out mainly the differences between Honda RA106 2006 car and Super Aguri SA07 2007 car which shares the same chassis .
I posted before that Williams would be my last photo comparison project for 2007 but i could not refuse to modbaraban and Belatti kind requets ....
NOSE CONE
MIRRORS
(I will post another better picture )
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 18:20
by zac510
Those mirrors look pretty similar to me!
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 18:49
by PNSD
funnily enough i noticed at the last race that SA had changed the mirrors from Hondas originals.
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 20:07
by bar555
MIRRORS 2
You can clearly see the difference now
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 20:47
by Belatti
Thank you very much bar555!
As I told you in my PM, it would be nice to have a comparison between this 2 cars (and the same with RBR 06´ - Toro Roso 07´).
The idea came to me after reading this:
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns19717.html
An important subject for the future of F1 tech regulations.
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 20:58
by bar555
I think it would be better to point out the differences and similarities between RBR 03 2007 and Torro Rosso STR02 because both cars have the same Andrian Newey's chassis .
RBR 02 2006 is a completely different car compared to STR02 .
I will begin this new project (photo comparison between RBR 03-STR02 2007) soon .......
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 23:23
by megz
Cool stuff man!
Posted: 05 Oct 2007, 23:38
by zac510
bar555 wrote:MIRRORS 2
You can clearly see the difference now
Ah good post, similar mirror and same position but a very different mounting!
Posted: 06 Oct 2007, 08:33
by bar555
ON BOARD
pay attention to the mirrors again
Posted: 07 Oct 2007, 19:28
by bar555
NOSE CONE HOLE
Posted: 08 Oct 2007, 06:03
by bar555
CHIMNEYS
Posted: 08 Oct 2007, 08:35
by modbaraban
The shape of the nosecone seems to be different as well? Or is it just down to angle of the shot taken?
Posted: 08 Oct 2007, 12:17
by ss_collins
Its the same car - you are in effect comparing RA106 with RA106 evo.
look at the early season car and compare it with the late RA106 - identical
Posted: 08 Oct 2007, 14:19
by bar555
modbaraban : The shape of the nosecone seems to be different as well? Or is it just down to angle of the shot taken?
Both cars have identical nose cone ends .Just different shot angle of the photos
ss_collins :Its the same car - you are in effect comparing RA106 with RA106 evo.
look at the early season car and compare it with the late RA106 - identical
You are right (same car yes but not identical) but i have to disagree about a few things. For the very first moment SA07 had different airbox , different sidepod vanes(i will post an analogous picture of this ) and never had a nose cone hole . The different mirrors had not been presented during winter testing but are used since the first race in Australia . Of course since Australia many aero parts were altered such as front and rear wing , T wings etc
Posted: 08 Oct 2007, 20:22
by bar555
SHARK GILLS
In some races were absent in both cars . There presence depends on the cooling needs ( hot climate , engine cooling needs defers from track to track )