Page 1 of 7

Help Belatti choose a new economical vehicle

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 20:47
by Belatti
My pocket is empty and tired from my Audi 1.8T and Im looking to buy something new, a bit more "economical".

What do you guys think about a Renault Clio 1.2 16v? Too small?

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 21:47
by adam2007
Belatti wrote:My pocket is empty and tired from my Audi 1.8T and Im looking to buy something new, a bit more "economical".

What do you guys think about a Renault Clio 1.2 16v? Too small?
Nissian Micra 1.0 ?? lol, one ugly car isnt it!

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 22:00
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
Belatti wrote:My pocket is empty and tired from my Audi 1.8T and Im looking to buy something new, a bit more "economical".

What do you guys think about a Renault Clio 1.2 16v? Too small?
Belatti, you poor soul. A 1.8T? I swear in the UK those cars dont see much more than 100,000 miles. So much for Audi's perceived quality.....

I would recommend a 1 series BMW. The diesels are punchy and rear drive and will get you 50mpg easily. So long as you can live with the looks(on Msport wheels it actually looks alright :D ) then you will have yourself a bloody fine car with some level of comfort and a whole new dimension of entertainment compared to the V...ahem...Audi sorry! :lol:

Failing that, a Renault sport 170 cup will do nicely!

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 22:12
by Richard
If you want distinctive, small and frugal, then how about ....

Nissan Cube?

Image

or Kia Soul?

Image

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 22:32
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
Richard i cannot believe you are serious...... :wtf:

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 22:34
by Richard
The Cube is silly, but the Kia Soul is well worth a look. One of our friends is a very happy owner!

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 09 Jun 2010, 23:44
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
For the same cash a 2year old123d BMW with 55mpg? and the ability to get "the ass out" round corners?
Or the ability to make you look "middle aged" lol

There is simply no other car that can combine the 1 series diesel combination of pace 0-62 in 6.7, sportiness (good rear drive handling), frugality(more even than a prius) and all round abilty to eat miles for its class(golf A3 etc)

I cannot think of one, and bravo beemer for making somthing as crushingly competent as this.

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 11:36
by adam2007
You should buy a Ford Focus Zetec-S its like a 2.5litre ST but with a 1.6 engine and looks sporty in 3 door :)

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 11:58
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
Adam

Dont mean to harp on mate.

Compare the 1series diesel to your Ford Focus. 8)

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 14:07
by adam2007
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Adam

Dont mean to harp on mate.

Compare the 1series diesel to your Ford Focus. 8)

1 series BMW? what a ugly looking car, i would at leaste buy the 3 series coupe or salooon, 1 series is revolting to look at.
Ford focus top selling car in uk. excellant chassis and handling the zetec-s version is better than your bmw son ;)

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 15:03
by RH1300S
Belatti wrote:My pocket is empty and tired from my Audi 1.8T and Im looking to buy something new, a bit more "economical".

What do you guys think about a Renault Clio 1.2 16v? Too small?
For what it's worth - I have a Nissan Micra (& a Renault Alpine A110 - so, not all bad :D). I love it.....economical, nothing has EVER gone wrong, servicing is easy and cheap by a local mechanic. Handling is funny (not a sportscar but trundles at quite amazing speeds if you never lift off). I have tried to kill it for years and it refuses to break. I even use it as a general skip & workhorse - last week it carried an engine and gearbox halfway down the country.

I really couldn't ask for more apart from looking like a granny's car.

Welove the Micra so much, Mrs RH sold her increasingly expensive A4 cabriolet for a Nissan Quasquai - we love that too. No hassle and does everything it says on the tin.

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 15:22
by Belatti
You definitively know nothing about the South American car market guys :lol:

We do not get the Korean and Japanese cars that Chile gets for being in the Pacific side.
We share Brazil cars, and all the 0Km my budget can buy are sardine cans with 1.2 to 1.6 NA engines. No sporty versions.

FIAT PALIO
Image
RENAULT CLIO
Image
VW GOL TREND
Image

@JWT: a 2 year old diesel Beemer here costs the double of these sardine cans and the Euro4 spec diesel fuel costs 25% more than regular diesel. No way for me, sadly.

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 15:28
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
adam2007 wrote:
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Adam

Dont mean to harp on mate.

Compare the 1series diesel to your Ford Focus. 8)

1 series BMW? what a ugly looking car, i would at leaste buy the 3 series coupe or salooon, 1 series is revolting to look at.
Ford focus top selling car in uk. excellant chassis and handling the zetec-s version is better than your bmw son ;)
Ugly?
Image
I dont think so.

Compare the stats for both and you find a different story too.

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 15:31
by JohnsonsEvilTwin
RH1300S wrote:
Belatti wrote:My pocket is empty and tired from my Audi 1.8T and Im looking to buy something new, a bit more "economical".

What do you guys think about a Renault Clio 1.2 16v? Too small?
For what it's worth - I have a Nissan Micra (& a Renault Alpine A110 - so, not all bad :D). I love it.....economical, nothing has EVER gone wrong, servicing is easy and cheap by a local mechanic. Handling is funny (not a sportscar but trundles at quite amazing speeds if you never lift off). I have tried to kill it for years and it refuses to break. I even use it as a general skip & workhorse - last week it carried an engine and gearbox halfway down the country.

I really couldn't ask for more apart from looking like a granny's car.

Welove the Micra so much, Mrs RH sold her increasingly expensive A4 cabriolet for a Nissan Quasquai - we love that too. No hassle and does everything it says on the tin.
Nissan very underrated car company. Here in the UK , Primera taxi's do 200,000 miles EASY.
And the old Primera GTI was a hoot!

Re: How do car manufacturers decide on engine configurations?

Posted: 10 Jun 2010, 15:35
by Richard
The BMW 1 has a smaller cabin and boot/trunk than the Focus, they serve different customers. Also, BMWs do tend to cost more than Fords ;)

Anyway, Belatti was looking at a Clio sized car.