shelly wrote:I appreciate volarchico's post, but I see that ringo, you have started over again with the same attitude, which has lead to a long and sometimes inconclusive thread.
I'll try not to misbehave myself, so I will start trying to point out what I think without putting it like it's falling from the skies.
My first point is this: a home made cfd with limited computing resources does not give reliable results when we are trying to discern exhaust trajctories in a f1 car. Who does agree/disagree/ need explaination about this?
For some reason i am put under the microscope with my opinion and it is rubish until proven realistic. Stop carrying feelings. I wasn't being rude to anyone.
I don't really understand what you mean by attitude either. I re read my post and i don't see anything offensive in it.
And saying homemade CFD is not accurate.
As said earlier the only limitation is the calculation time.
I didn't create a program for it to be homemade. I can't create these wonderfull software.
Secondly i'm just as qualified to run an accurate CFD as any other F1 engineer out there. I just don't have the work experience.
It would be nice if you could prove that "homemade" CFD is inaccurate.
So far it's holding up nicely.