JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:With Fuel?
I must have been watching a different practice on friday morning then!
granted the fuel levels were unkown, but you can tell when they are laden with fuel when the times drop around 4.5 to 5.5 seconds a lap...and the Bulls where still rampaging down 130 flat.
You get the gist though Raymond, I dont think many can dispute that the RB7 has the most usable downforce of the field...and this does help in the wet.
Downforce helps in dry track too
Mercedes is ~1.3sec to 1.8 sec off leaders depending on the race. I am sure compared to alleged difference between Red Bull and McLaren, Mercedes is way off from them in downforce department. Yet Schumacher was second fastest guy after Vettel at Canada when it was wet. When it dried he was no longer able to compete.
The point is in wet track the driver skill is much more essential (steering wheel input, throttle handling, car control, feeling the limit, choosing lines, whatever you call it). The performance gap between cars when wet is usually less not more. That is why they say equalizer not differentiator.
Based on McLaren performance at high downforce tracks, I am not sure they lack much vs Red Bull, if any at all.