It's an interesting issue really. Teams have also sometimes opt out of the Jerez test, in terms of bringing their new car, citing an extra week of design time as being more beneficial than having the Jerez test. Brawn in 09 (though to be fair - that wasn't exactly how they planned things) - RBR in 2010 - McLaren in 2011 - Mercedes in 2012 and Williams in 2013.beelsebob wrote:Because testing can still tell you a lot of things – like whether air is flowing to the places you expect it to flow, whether suspension is reacting the way you expect it to, whether the gearbox blows up 3 laps short of a race distance, ...iotar__ wrote:Since the beginning of the tests we hear that Jerez is an unusual track, high degradation, temperatures and layout unlike any track they use during the season. In short: not very useful. So forgive me for asking the obvious: why test there at all?!
Source: http://plus.autosport.com/premium/featu ... -pitstops/There has been a lot of talk about Williams opting to mess the Jerez test, but technical director Mike Coughlan left no doubt as to his feelings on that venue.
He was damning in his evaluation of the relevance, or lack thereof, of running at Jerez, making you wonder why F1 doesn't just go with his suggestion of taking up permanent pre-season residence in Catalunya.
"To begin with, we didn't plan to do Jerez at all," admitted Coughlan. "We only did Jerez because Pirelli was bringing its new tyres and we felt it would be better to run with the old car so that we had a known platform.
"I'm sure that a lot of people went to Jerez with a new car, new driver and new tyres and got lost. We didn't.
"If it was Barcelona, then we'd have gone, but it was Jerez. Jerez is unique; very high degradation, very aggressive, very rear-limited. You have to ask yourself is there really a track we go to that is even a similar type? And with weather conditions, you have to say 'do we learn a lot?'
"Barcelona is very good. We all have lots of simulations of the track. It's easy to get to, cheap flights, nice hotels. I'd rather see three tests at Barcelona."
Should the team of whoever that employee is employed by heed the wrath of a 100 million pound fine?stefan_ wrote:Taking spy pictures of the opponents' cars during winter testing - Lotus style.
http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/1235/r ... 702058.jpg
Awesome stuff! I'm really pleased someone thought the technique I used adjusting for number of laps remaining and tyre type was worth while. I also like the addition of track state to the equation. The only thing I find odd about the analysis is the that grade Mercedes a B+ for speed, despite acknowledging that it set 4 of the 6 fastest adjusted times, and 6 of the 20 fastest. The only basis for this seems to be that Hamilton said "meh, we're not winning yet".
Exactly what I've been saying about Ferrari's tyre deg.
Probably because he's been there and done it.
In hotter conditions things are going to be exponentially worse. That's why I'm particularly interested in Lotus.f1316 wrote:In saying that, however, I'm not sure that the article takes into account the cold conditions enough. It's a different kind of degradation than they would experience in hotter conditions....
Actually Pirelli says it´s exactly the other way around, with hotter track temperatures we will see milder degradation.munudeges wrote:In hotter conditions things are going to be exponentially worse. That's why I'm particularly interested in Lotus.f1316 wrote:In saying that, however, I'm not sure that the article takes into account the cold conditions enough. It's a different kind of degradation than they would experience in hotter conditions....
Yes, and it starts on Thursday!JimClarkFan wrote:Guys is there another test before the first race or no, I've looked about and can't see any but I swear there were three last year or am I being stu stu stupid???
Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests