Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

And it has a Name... https://twitter.com/andrewbensonf1/stat ... 6065758208 https://twitter.com/andrewbensonf1/stat ... 5169177601 Edit :
Pictures posted by F1NAC in the RB12 Thread
Image
Image

And some from the Autosport Forum:
Image
Image

Doesn't look half bad for now.
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

turbof1 wrote:If it passed collision testing, I see little to no reason not to introduce this next year. More then enough solutions to keep the windscreen clean.

Regarding open cockpit purity: I don't see why this goes more against the spirit of F1 then a halo. But keep a good section of the cockpit open. Imo, the halo is even less F1 as it looks clumsy compared to the elegant red bull solution.
I couldn't agree more. Plus imo it adds a futuristic touch to look of the cars.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
FW17
168
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

Much better effort than Ferrari

User avatar
RegerandeBull
3
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 12:52

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

Hopefully they can add an anti reflection coating at some point too.

Although it's prolly less of an issue on track than under artificial lighting.
Last edited by djos on 28 Apr 2016, 14:45, edited 1 time in total.
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

djos wrote:
turbof1 wrote:If it passed collision testing, I see little to no reason not to introduce this next year. More then enough solutions to keep the windscreen clean.

Regarding open cockpit purity: I don't see why this goes more against the spirit of F1 then a halo. But keep a good section of the cockpit open. Imo, the halo is even less F1 as it looks clumsy compared to the elegant red bull solution.
I couldn't agree more. Plus imo it adds a futuristic touch to look of the cars.
Imo, the following picture of the ever so iconic lotus 49c will put any so called purity talks down in the grave:
Image
It's ironic when a 40 old year car which is praised as a sigil for F1, has a rather similar windshield to the contested aeroscreen.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

nearly as huge as an LMP windscreen.

but looks okeyish, with wider 2017 cars visual impact might be reduced proportionwise...
Last edited by FrukostScones on 28 Apr 2016, 14:47, edited 1 time in total.
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

Nice find turbo, I've never seen that car before and it looks great!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

FrukostScones wrote:nearly as huge as an LMP windscreen.

but looks okeyish, with wider 2017 cars visual impact might be reduced proportionwise...
I think it's something we need to get used to. It would have helped if the shield stretched a bit further down the nose and curved a towards the top.

Still, so much better then the halo.
#AeroFrodo

User avatar
FW17
168
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

turbof1 wrote:
It's ironic when a 40 old year car which is praised as a sigil for F1, has a rather similar windshield to the contested aeroscreen.

Image

geraldix
geraldix
5
Joined: 01 Feb 2013, 14:22

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

Can't wait to see it on track! Looks great so far! So much better than that thing from Ferrari!

User avatar
FrukostScones
162
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

geraldix wrote:Can't wait to see it on track! Looks great so far! So much better than that thing from Ferrari!
yeah, but I doubt the visibility for the driver is better... esp. with those nice "a-pillars"...
Finishing races is important, but racing is more important.

User avatar
RegerandeBull
3
Joined: 03 Dec 2015, 12:52

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

Image

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

marvin78
marvin78
4
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 09:33

Re: Closed Cockpits agreed for 2017

Post

FW17 wrote:Much better effort than Ferrari
That thing was developed by Mercedes, not Ferrari.