Refuelling ban confirmed !?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:43 am

http://en.f1-live.com/f1/en/headlines/n ... 3137.shtml

If validated, that is great news as we are going back to more strategic tyre management.. almost back to early 90's rules..

If we could drop at the same time the two compound rule...
Patriiick
0
 
Joined: 29 Jul 2008

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:00 pm

wh? they had multiple compounds back then too
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:51 pm

ISLAMATRON wrote:wh? they had multiple compounds back then too


But they weren't both enforced ;)
Image
'10-'11 Head of Powertrain - Glasgow University Formula Student
Scotracer
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 22 Apr 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:00 pm

Scotracer wrote:
ISLAMATRON wrote:wh? they had multiple compounds back then too


But they weren't both enforced ;)


true, didnt they used to have 4 different compounds?
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:30 pm

ISLAMATRON wrote:
Scotracer wrote:
ISLAMATRON wrote:wh? they had multiple compounds back then too


But they weren't both enforced ;)


true, didnt they used to have 4 different compounds?

A,B,C and D with of course the fondly remembered qualifying tyre.
Agerasia
0
 
Joined: 14 Jan 2009

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 2:58 pm

They should keep the 2 different compounds, but drop the mandatory rule to run both.... BUT... they should have to start the race on whatever type of tire they qualify on.... that would be some serious strategy
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 3:13 pm

Agerasia wrote:A,B,C and D with of course the fondly remembered qualifying tyre.


I remember when I used to play Grand Prix, based in the 1991 season, maybe one of the first F1 simulators. The strategy that always payed was using D and make 2 or even 3 pitstops. I also used the A compound to make the game more interesting because the CC Cars where soooo slow!
"You need great passion, because everything you do with great pleasure, you do well." -Juan Manuel Fangio

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication and competence." -Ayrton Senna
Belatti
19
User avatar
 
Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Location: Argentina

0

Post Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:14 pm

In my mind the only way you'd mix things up with no refueling is to have severely different tyre compounds for the race. Even more so than now. It's the only thing that will stop the yawning.
gibells
1
 
Joined: 8 Apr 2009
Location: Andalucia, Spain

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:55 am

Someone correct me if I am wrong......happened once before, but it turned out I only thought I was wrong.
Isn't the push to eliminate refueling primarily a cost saving and safety measure..?? To avoid having to drag all the equipment, two refueling rigs for each team and extra people to every race.?? If they are forced to run without the strategy variations of fuel load, the only options are tyres.
My guess is that tyre management will become an enormous issue for the drivers with the teams likely wanting to go one with stop races.
The great news is that qualifying will now be real qualifying. None of this race fuel malarky.
Regardless, it will be a major shake-up in how the cars are built and how a team manages their strategy. Fast at the start or skew the car and settings to go fast at the finish. Should be extremely interesting.
Bridgstone, "Passion For Excellence" is not going to want to intentionally be bringing bad or even poor tyres to the races. The bad press will (and I am sure has already...) negate some of the publicity they get from F1.
Personal motto... "Were it not for the bad.... I would have no luck at all."
Ian P.
2
 
Joined: 8 Sep 2006

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:08 am

Ian P. wrote:Someone correct me if I am wrong......happened once before, but it turned out I only thought I was wrong.
Isn't the push to eliminate refueling primarily a cost saving and safety measure..?? To avoid having to drag all the equipment, two refueling rigs for each team and extra people to every race.?? If they are forced to run without the strategy variations of fuel load, the only options are tyres.
My guess is that tyre management will become an enormous issue for the drivers with the teams likely wanting to go one with stop races.
The great news is that qualifying will now be real qualifying. None of this race fuel malarky.
Regardless, it will be a major shake-up in how the cars are built and how a team manages their strategy. Fast at the start or skew the car and settings to go fast at the finish. Should be extremely interesting.
Bridgstone, "Passion For Excellence" is not going to want to intentionally be bringing bad or even poor tyres to the races. The bad press will (and I am sure has already...) negate some of the publicity they get from F1.


surely to be fast at the start and maintain position right?
Michiba
0
 
Joined: 28 Apr 2008

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:12 am

Ian P. wrote:Someone correct me if I am wrong......happened once before, but it turned out I only thought I was wrong.
Isn't the push to eliminate refueling primarily a cost saving and safety measure..?? To avoid having to drag all the equipment, two refueling rigs for each team and extra people to every race.?? If they are forced to run without the strategy variations of fuel load, the only options are tyres.
My guess is that tyre management will become an enormous issue for the drivers with the teams likely wanting to go one with stop races.
The great news is that qualifying will now be real qualifying. None of this race fuel malarky.
Regardless, it will be a major shake-up in how the cars are built and how a team manages their strategy. Fast at the start or skew the car and settings to go fast at the finish. Should be extremely interesting.
Bridgstone, "Passion For Excellence" is not going to want to intentionally be bringing bad or even poor tyres to the races. The bad press will (and I am sure has already...) negate some of the publicity they get from F1.

Actually I think there is not much chance you will see much one stop racing as the very heavy start weights (min weight is to increase + all race fuel) will mean even greater tyre wear than this year. There haven't been too many succesful one stop strategies this year.
paused
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 30 Mar 2009

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:23 am

Low fuel qualifying will be a treat. I look forward to that for many years. The tyre stop strategies will very much depend of the circuits. Some are easy on the tyres and you can save a lot of time by making fewer stops when you do not need to stop for fuel. It is usually 20 s you loose for a stop and you have to be 1 s per lap faster to make that good on a typical stint. I would think that most races will see at least one stop dropped from todays strategy.

You also have to consider that you will start on cold tyres after a stop. Tyre warmers are banned. That could easily add another 2-3 s to your first lap when you are struggling to make the tyres heat up.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)
WhiteBlue
46
User avatar
 
Joined: 14 Apr 2008
Location: WhiteBlue Country

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:48 am

Half the passing we currently have is done via pitstops, so next year less pitstops, less passing (position changing anyways) just about guaranteed because of this rule.
Before I do anything I ask myself “Would an idiot do that?” And if the answer is yes, I do not do that thing. - Dwight Schrute
Giblet
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Location: Downtown Canada

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:29 pm

WhiteBlue wrote:Tyre warmers are banned.


that is not yet confirmed... i think the teams and most of the drivers want them to stay... i hop they get rid of em
ISLAMATRON
0
User avatar
 
Joined: 1 Oct 2008

0

Post Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:46 pm

ISLAMATRON wrote:They should keep the 2 different compounds, but drop the mandatory rule to run both.... BUT... they should have to start the race on whatever type of tire they qualify on.... that would be some serious strategy


I'm not sure about the benefits therein.

With the refueling ban, we're going to see fast Q3's again. Making the qualifying tire have to be the race starting tire only means a cramp on Q3 times, all over again.

Also, the weather has too much effect on tires to make that a valid rule. I don't mean rain vs dry, but in many venues, the difference between the hottest, driest day, and a cool, high humidity day can be 12 hours or less.

Fuel is something you can strategize, independent of the weather. Tires, I'd think not.
The FOZ
0
 
Joined: 7 Feb 2008
Location: Winterpeg, Canada

Next

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 10 guests