F1 Points System: Points for Most overtakes of a Race

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Are u in favor?

Yes
2
22%
No
7
78%
 
Total votes : 9

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:47 am

Considering the "frequency" of overtaking in F1, I think 2 points or so should be awarded to the driver with most overtakes for each race. If there's a tie, no points should be awarded. Also I'd like the 12, 8....point system implemented. I like the gap of 4 points between the winner and runner up so that if a driver got to 2nd position with the most overtakes, he doesn't end up having more points than the winner of the race. I think this is a pretty good incentive for overtaking rather than waiting for the guy to pit. What do u you guys think?
Last edited by rifrafs2kees on Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
rifrafs2kees
 
Joined: 9 Nov 2009

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:22 am

Hi there,

I very strongly disagree with the proposition. I don't want to offend you but this is not a very well thought out idea at all. Drivers getting lucky at the start could pass many cars. It would be impossible to count who passed who. Also based on this two drivers of the same team could pass each other back and forth to get the 2 points.

I don't agree that current F1 is much worse in terms of overtaking than those of past years, decades. It is just that we tend to have selective memory and remember the best moments.

Happy holidays nevertheless,

Laz
szlaszlo84
 
Joined: 18 Mar 2009

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:31 am

I second the opinion above.
"It could be done manually. It would take quite a while, but it could be done. There is however a much more efficient and accurate way of getting the data. Men with lasers." Wing Commander Andy Green
roost89
 
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Location: Highlands, Scotland

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:36 am

I didn't consider intra-team shenenigans. Passing your team mate shouldn't count. Also passes brought about by first corner mishaps and so on shouldn't be considered. We all know genuine passes when we see one. It's not a perfect system and there will never be one. But a reward for passing isn't a bad idea.
rifrafs2kees
 
Joined: 9 Nov 2009

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 6:19 am

So let's say a driver A starts on pole and holds on in the first corner and then goes on to lead every lap. Is driver A then being punished for his performance because the driver B who finished 2nd may have started in 6th and had more overtaking moves? Shouldn't finishing 2nd instead of 6th be incentive enough for driver B?

Everyone keeps trying to come up with incentives to artificially induce passing, as if the prospect of scoring more points for a higher position isn't already an incentive. The idea where the winner gets double points than 2nd place or other crackpot theories don't make sense. The assumption there is that if the driver in 2nd place is capable of winning the race he's not going to try. Show me a competitive driver who's just going to sit back and not try to win if he has a legitimate shot. Yes, we do see driver's sitting back sometimes because closing in and making a pass is just not physically realistic. It's the nature of evenly matched competition. Besides, the goal is to win the war not every battle.

Sports Car Design Blog

"...engineering is the art of moulding materials we do not wholly understand into shapes that we cannot precisely analyse, so as to withstand forces we cannot really assess, in such a way that the community at large has no reason to suspect the extent of our ignorance."
    Dr. AR Dykes, Chairman, Scottish Branch of IStructE, 1978

Mystery Steve
 
Joined: 25 Sep 2009
Location: Dayton, OH, USA

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 8:28 am

rifrafs2kees wrote:I didn't consider intra-team shenenigans. Passing your team mate shouldn't count. Also passes brought about by first corner mishaps and so on shouldn't be considered. We all know genuine passes when we see one. It's not a perfect system and there will never be one. But a reward for passing isn't a bad idea.


but then you have RB and TR
both teams have the same guy paying the bills
bjpower
 
Joined: 17 May 2009

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:23 am

I think people overtake when they can. I can't think of an occasion when somebody has refused to overtake because it had no "reward". Proffessional drivers are mad: they not only take enormous risks, they also have an ego the size of a transatlantic.

There are plenty of series with more overtakes, like stock cars (DTM, V8, NASCAR) you can watch. F1 is a resources race and an engineering competition more than a competition of drivers: most of them are as good as it gets.

I'll update this year's figures soon. Meanwhile check this:

Image

I see a strong correlation between the strength of the car and the number of overtakings. Notice that Massa (this figures are for 2007, sorry, I know figures for 2008 are interred somewhere in the forum) has 20 overtakes in the whole year. That's slightly over 1 overtake per race... Notice Schumacher figures.

Conclusion: the proposed system would be exploited by teams, they're nobody's fool. At least (I'm latino, sorry ;)) I would qualify in a position well below my car possibilities, just to earn the points you would distribute. How would you cope with that?
Ciro
Ciro Pabón
 
Joined: 10 May 2005

Post Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:22 pm

I've been always quite sceptical about success ballasts or scoring systems that would encourage any driver to want anything else than finish every qualifying and race as high as possible.

Image
Pandamasque
 
Joined: 9 Nov 2009
Location: Ukraine


Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: beelsebob, CCBot [Bot] and 6 guests