internetf1fan wrote:timbo wrote:internetf1fan wrote:It might backfire or it might work magically. We all saw how McLaren made KERS work in 2009 while most other teams failed to do so and eventually got rid of KERS from their cars.
It took them more than half a season to make it work.
In a car that was designed around it.
How can you imagine it would work "magically"?
What I am saying is there are other avenues of development and McLaren should not just go around bolting on parts from other cars that were specifically designed for the particular car.
That is what you do in F1, even if you have fastest car.
You look for every idea no matter where it came from.
1)Because they know what they're doing as they have had a year of experience.
2)It seems McLaren have stopped their normal development programmes chasing parts from other teams. They should stop doing this if this delays their normal upgrade paths.
So, McLaren should implement a device that the teams have agreed not to use, at the expense of all of their remaining credibility within the sporting community, for the sake of performance gains that might be negligible (or perhaps even work against them) and that they cannot test anyway?
This non-sequitur is almost a master-plan for McLaren's self destruction.
If McLaren are having problems with their aerodynamics now, just imagine what it would do when they try to work it around the components needed for KERS.
If McLaren are having problems with their balance right now, just imagine what would happen to the weight distribution when they add extra weight.
I could go on, but that would be an exercise in futility ...
Out of interest, does anyone know if the current generation of Mercedes engines even still carry the KERS pick up point? I heard that part of the reason why Williams never used their KERS was that Toyota never bothered updating their engine so that KERS could be integrated.
McLaren are not on the pace right now, but the time for desperate measures is NOT when you are leading the championship.