David vs. Goliath(Red Bull vs. Ferrari), myth or truth?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Post Sat Dec 25, 2010 1:19 pm

Since a while back, I've wanted to know the truth about Red Bull. They keep on talking about how they are a small team up against the big teams. But is that really the truth? Of course their rivals claim that it's not. Does anyone know? This article reveals that the maybe the Red Bull saga is not so impressive as they want us to think.

http://en.espnf1.com/redbull/motorsport ... 37055.html


They certainly don't seem to lack the facilities, technology or engineers that the bigger teams have, e.g. they have a simulator which is considered a "luxury". What budget are they really running on?
The speed of Ayrton Senna.
The mind of Alain Prost.
The dedication of Michael Schumacher.
The determination of Alex Zanardi.
Donuts
 
Joined: 1 Jun 2010

Post Sat Dec 25, 2010 4:11 pm

Max does not seem to think they are playing fair and he should know.
autogyro
 
Joined: 4 Oct 2009

Post Sat Dec 25, 2010 6:53 pm

Its all typical Horner bulls**t. Force India is a small team, Red bull has tons of cash if they need it.
spinmastermic
 
Joined: 28 Oct 2008
Location: Dark places

Post Sun Dec 26, 2010 1:30 am

Well.. red bull is bigger than ferrari. Ferrari defintely has the experience advantage.

As mosley said, with money you can get good engineers, drivers, etc..
Come back 747, we miss you!!
Caito
 
Joined: 16 Jun 2009
Location: Argentina

Post Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:02 pm

Redbull has the backing of, Redbull, obviouslly. The money is always there if they need it, I expect they operate on a simelar budget to McLaren.

They are not a new team, they are not a small team, just bullshit that Horner says to make them "interesting"
Confused_Andy
 
Joined: 8 Jul 2009

Post Sun Dec 26, 2010 3:37 pm

Oh, Primadonna misses attention!
I think he needs another sex scandal.

OTOH RBR is not a small team. What's the problem?
timbo
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Sun Dec 26, 2010 10:55 pm

So what are the penalties for Red Bull going over the gentlemans agreement?

Is there a structure in place or will this be the staw that breaks FOTA's back? Amusing how Horner utters so much BS, has there ever been a team principal who is so PR biased?
More could have been done.
David Purley
JohnsonsEvilTwin
 
Joined: 29 Jan 2010
Location: SU 419113

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:16 am

they've opened up a division called red bull technology, they employ all the clever peoples... ferrari can do the same if they really want to
est1984
 
Joined: 2 Aug 2008

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 12:25 am

Ferrari dont have to, they are accepted as a top technology car company.

A technical department at red bull just sounds like a department working on how to get more caffeine into their fizzy water to hook more kids into drinking it.
Last edited by autogyro on Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
autogyro
 
Joined: 4 Oct 2009

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:15 pm

Never thought I would see myself typing this, but I agree with MrM completely, the "staff limit" on the teams was ridicilous
from the word go, as if you could ever control how many engineers a team has in it's "technology subsidiaries"?

I believe RBR to be the richest team on the grid, as they act as a PR operation only, with no other considerations.
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:29 pm

xpensive wrote:Never thought I would see myself typing this, but I agree with MrM completely, the "staff limit" on the teams was ridicilous
from the word go, as if you could ever control how many engineers a team has in it's "technology subsidiaries"?

Nothing different with budget limit.
timbo
 
Joined: 22 Oct 2007

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 2:32 pm

There were to be legal checks and balances with the budget cap.
There are non for the 'old boys network' agreement.
autogyro
 
Joined: 4 Oct 2009

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 3:31 pm

I don't know about that Gyro, but the "headcount" was so unbeliveably stupid it defied engineering common sense.

Cutting cost is obviously a good thing, at least for the minnows, but I doubt if you can never ever police it.
"Bernoulli is a nine-letter name"
xpensive
 
Joined: 22 Nov 2008

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:24 pm

spinmastermic wrote:Its all typical Horner bulls**t. Force India is a small team, Red bull has tons of cash if they need it.


I love that guy's constant smoke screens. I hope they run a "Red Herring" livery for just one race next season. And tie wrap a honey jar to the beam wing.

JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Amusing how Horner utters so much BS, has there ever been a team principal who is so PR biased?


I've been wondering this myself.
Formula None
 
Joined: 17 Nov 2010

Post Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:42 pm

What where the team budgets in 2010? Hard to find any reliable informaton!
Anyone bought the "Formulamoney" book? :wtf:
Last edited by Donuts on Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The speed of Ayrton Senna.
The mind of Alain Prost.
The dedication of Michael Schumacher.
The determination of Alex Zanardi.
Donuts
 
Joined: 1 Jun 2010

Next

Return to General chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CCBot [Bot], otbsti, psbot [Picsearch], Yandex [Bot] and 11 guests