Most likely, so let's go with 2035 then.
I really hope they won't continue with the V6 after 15/20 years.saviour stivala wrote: ↑27 Apr 2024, 19:07Nothing new, in fact more of the same doom and gloom. The exact same stuff that was pushed out and thrown about during the years leading to the back than new to be introduced 1.6l turbo PU.
cause after a decade of shoving EVs into people’s face, they are still less that 1% of registered cars in the US, and sales declining everywhere. It might still not be enough for “environmentalists” but by 2028-2030 it will be very clear they are a failure (comparing to what media wanted people to believe) It is unrealistic to expect any change of this trend, much less to say “the entire fleet will be electric”DenBommer wrote: ↑28 Apr 2024, 09:15I really hope they won't continue with the V6 after 15/20 years.saviour stivala wrote: ↑27 Apr 2024, 19:07Nothing new, in fact more of the same doom and gloom. The exact same stuff that was pushed out and thrown about during the years leading to the back than new to be introduced 1.6l turbo PU.
Hopefully, they come up with something else.
Edit: On the other hand, why invest in combustion engines when the entire vehicle fleet is moving towards EVs anyway. It would indeed be better to invest more in the electric components and lighter materials.
Not sure how much involvement FOM has had in the rules making process, but it should be none.With F1 chiefs and the FIA close to finalising the 2026 chassis and power unit regulations over the next few weeks
They can play with the fuel flow and ERS energy flows to get the desired result.
Domenicali says in this article about possible alternative options for louder engines. What could these options possibly be?wuzak wrote: ↑15 May 2024, 12:53https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/f1-re ... /10611068/
The FOM's CEO Stefano Domenicali suggests that a new formula could be had from 2030.
I'm not sure that the manufcaturers woudl be too enthusiastic about that.
Not sure how much involvement FOM has had in the rules making process, but it should be none.With F1 chiefs and the FIA close to finalising the 2026 chassis and power unit regulations over the next few weeks
By "declining" you mean not growing as fast... What's clear is the move away from ICE.V12-POWER wrote: ↑15 May 2024, 12:36cause after a decade of shoving EVs into people’s face, they are still less that 1% of registered cars in the US, and sales declining everywhere. It might still not be enough for “environmentalists” but by 2028-2030 it will be very clear they are a failure (comparing to what media wanted people to believe) It is unrealistic to expect any change of this trend, much less to say “the entire fleet will be electric”DenBommer wrote: ↑28 Apr 2024, 09:15I really hope they won't continue with the V6 after 15/20 years.saviour stivala wrote: ↑27 Apr 2024, 19:07Nothing new, in fact more of the same doom and gloom. The exact same stuff that was pushed out and thrown about during the years leading to the back than new to be introduced 1.6l turbo PU.
Hopefully, they come up with something else.
Edit: On the other hand, why invest in combustion engines when the entire vehicle fleet is moving towards EVs anyway. It would indeed be better to invest more in the electric components and lighter materials.
Actually EVs are best suited for city use.