Not necessarily.xpensive wrote:But the point is that if you disconnect the MGU-H on a split turbo, the turbine and compressor will no longer turn at the same speed.
Not necessarily.xpensive wrote:But the point is that if you disconnect the MGU-H on a split turbo, the turbine and compressor will no longer turn at the same speed.
Article 5.1.6 of 2014 F1 Technical Regs (think it's going to be the same for 2015):xpensive wrote:But the point is that if you disconnect the MGU-H on a split turbo, the turbine and compressor will no longer turn at the same speed.
Imagine an MGU-H with a hollow shaft with the shaft that connects the turbine to the compressor running through it. A clutch can connect the two shafts. In this case disconnecting the MGU-H does not disconnect the turbine and compressor from each other.xpensive wrote:But the point is that if you disconnect the MGU-H on a split turbo, the turbine and compressor will no longer turn at the same speed.
It depends where the MHU-H is located, with a split turbo, it would seem logical to place it between turbine and compressor,mrluke wrote:Not necessarily.xpensive wrote:But the point is that if you disconnect the MGU-H on a split turbo, the turbine and compressor will no longer turn at the same speed.
My home-grown theory is that the regulation-writers had no concept of the split turbo at the time, while the clutch was intended as a safety device if the 100 000+ rpm device would smoke, but with the MHPE-unit, said clutch meant unforeseen advantages.Tommy Cookers wrote: ...
or ........
how can the mgu-h be so useful for spooling-up but at other times so undesirable that declutching is important ?
I admire your faith in the regulators GG.gruntguru wrote:The regulators would have anticipated a MGUH location between the turbine and compressor - that is the most logical place. Have any of the teams put it somewhere else?
Ferrari's is between the turbine and compressor, but closely coupled. Renault's is ahead of the compressor inlet.gruntguru wrote:The regulators would have anticipated a MGUH location between the turbine and compressor - that is the most logical place. Have any of the teams put it somewhere else?
The manufacturers wer eheavily involved in forming the regulations. I'm sure Renault and Ferrari also considered it. Last year there were some people in here who though of the Mercedes layout and drew sketches reflecting that.xpensive wrote:I admire your faith in the regulators GG.gruntguru wrote:The regulators would have anticipated a MGUH location between the turbine and compressor - that is the most logical place. Have any of the teams put it somewhere else?
WilliamsF1 wrote:Magneti Marelli unviels new hardware for new 2014 rules
Auto123.com
R Fagnan,
Monday, September 10, 2012
Italian electronic company Magneti Marelli used the paddock of Autodromo di Monza last weekend to reveal some of their new hardware destined to run the new 1600cm3, V6 turbo engines in 2014.
http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/147452 ... inline.jpg
Photo: WRI2
Magneti Marelli engineers started by showing their new ERS system -- an engine boost coming from the recovery of kinetic energy during braking associated with the energy coming from exhaust gases, both aimed at feeding the electrical motor-generators hooked up to the engine shaft).
http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/147452 ... inline.jpg
Heat exhaust recovery system (Photo: WRI2)
Then, they unviled their new fuel systems (injectors and pumps for GDI engines with fuel pressure of up to 500 bar) as well as their two-way WI-FI systems for data transmission from vehicle to infrastructure (i.e., exchange of a much larger set of data and of different types of signals between machine and pit).
http://www.auto123.com/ArtImages/147452 ... inline.jpg
Different KERS components (Photo: WRI2)
In their press release, Magneti Marelli writes that the technology and methods used in developing the KERS system are a source of solutions and technological spin-offs for systems and components aimed at mass-produced hybrid and electric engines (moto-generators, electronic control systems, inverters, battery control, etc.).
After seeing that turbo, this previous configuration discussed here before looks all the more possible.
http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 4&start=45
Of course wuz, each carrying their own agenda, a camel is a horse designed by committee.wuzak wrote: ...
The manufacturers wer eheavily involved in forming the regulations. I'm sure Renault and Ferrari also considered it. Last year there were some people in here who though of the Mercedes layout and drew sketches reflecting that.
...
The enigine is air to air intercooled as well.Egresi Tamás wrote:1Escape
2 Combustible
3 Entrada aire intercooler
4 ICE
5 Tubería de radiador a intercooler
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B3MrusbCAAEr4LX.jpg:large